â€œCare must be taken not to give a platform for deniersâ€¦ or seek to disprove the deniersâ€™ position through normal historical debate and rational argument.â€
â€” â€˜Guidelines for Teaching about the Holocaustâ€™ at the Stockholm International Forum, 2000
â€œOne should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one.â€
â€” â€œ34 reputable historiansâ€ published in the prominent French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979
Free yourself from a lifetime of Holo-brainwashing about â€œSix Millionâ€ Jews â€œgassedâ€ in â€œGas Chambers Disguised as Shower Roomsâ€â€”
An Introduction to Historical Revisionism
VIDEOS & DOCUMENTARIES
The â€˜Gas Chambersâ€™ not demonstrated at the Nuremberg Tribunal
This is a bi-lingual video from Vincent Reynouard. The narration is in French, with English sub-titles.Â Argument #1 â€“ At Nuremberg, the existence of the â€œgas chambersâ€ was never demonstrated.
Gas Chamber Expert Fred Leuchter Exposes Gas Chamber Hoax
Fred Leuchter Excerpt About His Investigation of Alleged â€œGassingsâ€ in Auschwitz
The Leuchter Report Full
The Leuchter Report: A Crash Course
The Second Leuchter Report
Prof. Robert Faurisson: An Introduction to Holocaust Revisionism
Holohoax Survivors Who Tell The Truth
Holocaust Cremation Facts
Holocaust Cremation Facts 2
Anthony Lawson: Holocaust, Hate Speech & Were the Germans so Stupid?
Having been tortured, Rudolf HÃ¶ss, who was the commander of Auschwitz from 1940 to 1943, almost certainly lied to save the lives of his wife and children. Even if torture and duress cannot be proven, the overwhelming reason for recognizing the utter falsity of the HÃ¶ss confession is that the gassing method he described was not scientifically plausible.Â Yet HÃ¶ssâ€™s conviction has stood, by inference, as a testament to the cruelty of Germans in general, since he was tried at Nuremberg, in 1947, and subsequently hanged on April 16th, 1947, in Poland.Â Making a statement like this which doubts the officially ordained narrative can be a crime in a number of western â€œdemocracies,â€ believe it or not, and it is at least considered to be reprehensible in those countries that have not (yet?) outlawed dissenting views on this topic.Â This video discusses the social and judicial persecution of individuals voicing dissident opinions on the historical event usually referred to as the Holocaust. It castigates that persecution and lays bare the illegality and amorality of such activities. In addition, a number of the most striking historical arguments why dissenting = revisionist views on the Holocaust are reasonable, are presented. A brief look into the political agenda of those furthering the orthodox Holocaust narrative rounds up this amazing movie.
Jewish Revisionist David Cole in Auschwitz (1992)
David Cole in Auschwitz â€” David Cole Interviews Dr. Franciszek Piper, Director, Auschwitz State Museum
A young Jewish Holocaust Denier, posing as a believer, puts some hard questions to the senior curator of the Auschwitz State Museum. After making this video, a â€œhitâ€ was put out on Cole, and a reward for information on his whereabouts was issued by Irv Rubin (who years later, was arrested by the FBI for planning to kill a Lebanese-American Congressman.) Fearing assassination, Cole went into hiding.
Holocaust Examination â€“ Dr. Fredrick TÃ¶ben
(Judea Declares War on Germany: A Critical Look at WWII)
This is a documentary by Dr. Fredrick TÃ¶ben of the Adelaide Institute in Australia that examines whether it is scientifically/technically possible for the Holocaust to have been carried out in the manner claimed in mainstream historical accounts. It also questions popular notions of the motivations and events which resulted in the outbreak of WWII.
Auschwitz: The Surprising Hidden Truth (2012)
This video looks into some of the common claims made by survivors about what happened at Auschwitz. Some of the questions asked in this context are: Was it possible to fill the gas chambers with victims as it is claimed? Would the Jews, supervised only by other Jews, have cooperated in their own mass slaughter? What doors were used to lock in 2,000 Jews struggling for their lives? How efficient was the cremation process really? How many Auschwitz inmates left the camp alive to tell the world what they had seen? This video gives the answers to these and to other questions, backed-up by documents and expert testimony. The results are astounding, if not to say: shocking. The discrepancies between survivor claims on the one hand and technical as well as physical reality on the other hand reveal the surprising truth about Auschwitz, which is not what most people think it is.
One Third Of The Holocaust (2009) (4hr 15min)
This documentary explains how the German wartime camps at Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec (all in Poland) were not death camps, as is usually claimed. It thereby debunks one third of the Holocaust. The movie asks questions like, â€œWould the Germans have really put a fence made out of tree branches around a deathcamp?â€ Answer: â€œUh, no, thatâ€™s silly.â€ And would they have then conducted a huge burning operation inside this flammable fence?Â This documentary was banned by YouTube. It comes in 30 episodes, with a total length of 4 hours 15 min.
Buchenwald: A Dumb Dumb Portrayal Of Evil (2009)
The liberation of the German war-time concentration camp at Buchenwald presented an opportunity for an Allied Psyche Warfare operation meant to denazify the Germans via atrocity stories. The person in charge reported directly to Eisenhower, so it was coordinated from higher up. But this operation â€œblew backâ€ into USA media, which is why Americans remember growing up hearing stories of lampshades made of the skin of murdered inmates.
Spielbergâ€™s Hoax â€“ The Last Days of The Big Lie (2011)
Spielbergâ€™s â€œdocumentaryâ€ The Last Days stars Irene Zisblatt, who claims to have had her Auschwitz tattoo removed by Dr. Mengele, had her skin selected to become a lampshade, escaped from inside a gas chamber, and repeatedly defecated and swallowed diamonds for a year.Â In addition, Spielbergâ€™s documentary hoax features another woman who claims to have escaped from inside a gas chamber, a Nazi doctor framed with an â€œexperimentationâ€ lie, as well as an African-American â€œLiberatorâ€ who was actually hundreds of miles away at the time he claims he witnessed the liberation of Dachau.Â The Last Days of the Big Lieuses Spielbergâ€™s hoax documentary as a jumping off point to expose his â€œUSC Survivors of the Shoah Visual History Foundationâ€ and the greater Holocaust myth.
The Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax (2014)
As of 2014, Steven Spielbergâ€™s â€œSurvivors of the Shoah Visual History Foundationâ€ has recorded nearly 52,000 interviews in 56 countries and in 32 languages with so-called â€œHolocaust survivors.â€ The present documentary uses some of them to prove that the orthodox tale about the alleged extermination camp at Treblinka is untenable. It is a Revisionist documentary presenting the latest evidence debunking the greatest hoax in human history: â€œThe Holocaustâ€ â€“ that is to say, the fraudulent claim that six million Jews were murdered by Germans, mostly in â€œGas Chambers disguised as Shower Rooms.â€ Never before seen evidence helps prove that Treblinka was a transit camp, far from the â€œPure Extermination Campâ€ myth currently promoted by the Holocaust religion. For the first time ever, listen to Jews themselves who were transited through Treblinka describe the process of being transferred from Treblinka to other camps, along with hundreds and thousands of other men women and children. Documentation is presented which affirms that Treblinka was no top secret â€œpure extermination center,â€ but a simple transit camp where some Jews even took real showers in order to keep them alive. The absurdity of diesel gassings, non-existent mass graves, forced confessions, and more are covered in The Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax, a new documentary from the filmmaker of The Last Days of the Big Lie.
The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax (2014)
Were 900,000 Jews â€œgassedâ€ at Treblinka? Were 3.9 Million â€œSteamed to Deathâ€ in â€œsteam chambersâ€ there too, as according to Nuremberg trial â€œevidenceâ€? The official â€œHolocaustâ€ story is that Treblinka 2 is the largest mass burial site in the entire world, where the Germans gassed 900,000 Jews in 13 â€œgas chambers disguised as shower rooms.â€ â€œHolocaust Deniersâ€ or â€œHolocaust Revisionistsâ€ claim thereâ€™s no evidence for that, and tales of â€œgas chambers disguised as shower roomsâ€ are wartime atrocity fiction, similar to previously debunked claims about Jews being made into soap and lampshades.The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax debunks Zionist British Archaeologist Caroline Sturdy Collsâ€™ fraudulent â€œinvestigationâ€ of Treblinka, which included digging near clearly marked Christian graves claiming to find new â€œhidden mass gravesâ€, falsely assigning homicidal intent to a normal life-saving shower room at Majdanek, and misidentifying a terra-cotta tile excavated at Treblinka as belonging to the floor of a homicidal â€œgas chamber.â€http://gaschamberhoax.com
TheÂ Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth (2014)
The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth debunks the â€œGas Chambers Disguised as Shower Roomsâ€ propaganda coup. Majdanek was the first major concentration camp liberated by the victorious Allies. Upon capture by the Soviet Union, original propaganda claimed that 2 million were murdered in a â€œfactory of deathâ€ which included seven homicidal gas chambers. However, Majdanek was captured largely intact and a large amount of documentation and physical evidence helps to acquit the Germans of the â€œGas Chambers disguised as shower roomsâ€ blood libel. The original, outrageously inflated propaganda death toll has precipitously dropped, and 5 of the 7 originally alleged â€œhomicidal gas chambersâ€ have been admitted to never have served as homicidal gas chambers. The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth demolishes the Holocaust exterminationist â€œGas Chambers Disguised as Shower Roomsâ€ propaganda hoax and shows how Majdanek is a microcosm of the larger Holocaust Hoax.
The Great Holocaust Trial of 1985
The infamous first trial where the defendant in the case, Ernst ZÃ¼ndel, was physically assaulted daily in front of the Toronto courthouse where his case was being heard and nothing was really done about it by RCMP or any other Canadian police agency. In the first part the newscaster describes how Ernst ZÃ¼ndellâ€™s defense lawyer Douglas Christie demolishes â€œHolocaustâ€ expert Raul Hilberg on the witness stand. Afterward, summaries of views on the â€œHolocaustâ€ by defense witnesses Prof. Robert Faurisson, Dr. Russell Barton, Dr. William Lindsey and Thies Christophersen are given. Particularly significant is Dr. Bartonâ€™s testimony: as an eyewitness at Bergen-Belsen he states categorically that the deaths at that camp were not due to a deliberate policy of extermination regardless of false commentary over photographs and film depicting stacked corpses. The last part of the video shows fanatical Jewish Defense LeagueÂ extremists and terrorists demonstrating their animalistic tendencies outside of the courthouse during theÂ ZÃ¼ndel trial.
Because the defendant ZÃ¼ndel, and his lawyer Doug Christie, were proving their case so soundly, it elicited an off the cuff outburst from the judge on a series of objections by the prosecutors to blurt out, â€œthe truth is no defense!â€ I kid you not. I urge you to watch this staple documentary that will give you a good overall picture of the trial and why it was called. All for the re-printing of the 20 year old book, â€œDid Six Million Really Die?â€
â€œOff Your Knees, Germany!â€ â€“ The Ernst ZÃ¼ndel Story (2011)
The story of German and Canadian dissident Ernst ZÃ¼ndelâ€™s fight for free speech for his politically-incorrect views on WWII. Imprisoned in solitary confinement, sued, firebombed, threatened, and deported from the US,Â ZÃ¼ndel fights on. This unique documentary explains in vivid detail how a powerful special interest Lobby masterminded a modern political kidnapping on American soil â€“ in a last ditch attempt to silence an inconvenient dissident.
Ernst ZÃ¼ndel â€“ Setting the Record Straight (2007)
Known for his two ground-breaking Holocaust Trials in 1985 and 1988 that resulted in the forensic investigation known as the best-selling â€œLeuchter Reportâ€, ErnstÂ ZÃ¼ndel is the worldâ€™s best-known and most successful Holocaust Debunker.Â Kidnapped on American soil in 2003 at the instigation of his political detractors and imprisoned in Germany for the â€œthought crimeâ€ of questioning the orthodox version of the Holocaust, ZÃ¼ndelâ€™s indefatiguable struggle for Truth in History is grippingly captured on this detailed documentary.
Ernst ZÃ¼ndel & David Cole Exposing Auschwitz (1993)
Ernst ZÃ¼ndel â€“ Holocaust Facts vs. Fiction part 1 of 3
David Irving â€“ Holocaust (Holohoax) Lies Exposed!
The Holocaust Unveiled â€“ Persecution of Revisionists (2006)
Why have some peopleâ€“described herein as the â€œThought Policeâ€â€“incessantly attacked revisionists of all different backgrounds (from Gentiles, to Jews, to Christians, to Muslims, to freethinkers, to whites, to Arabs, etc.) in some of the most horrible ways imaginable? The Thought Police have not just merely suppressed the revisionistsâ€™ findings by boycotting them but have also censored them by promoting laws to make their honest findings punishable by jail time, committed arson, murdered them, threw acid on their faces, beat them, smashed their homes, and engaged in other acts of mayhem? Lately, too many people have been sentenced to jail for such crimesâ€“with it now being a criminal offense in Australia, Canada, Austria, Germany, Italy, England, and most other countries in Europe and beyond to merely question virtually any aspect of WWII history dealing with the Holocaust. ErnstÂ ZÃ¼ndel was taken away from his American wife in the hills of Tennessee. Germar Rudolf, a Ph.D.-level chemist, was also taken away from his wife and their child in Illinois and deported to Germany to stand trial. David Irving, a world renowned historian, was sentenced to three years in jail for merely one single sentence, uttered 15 years ago in Austria! The Thought Police will stop at nothing to silence these brave revisionists. We truly do live in Orwellian Times. Find out about the dozens of revisionists who have suffered, and learn what findings these truth-seekers have uncovered that make them the targets of persecution around the globe.
â€œEl Gran Tabuâ€ â€“ A Documentary by David Cole (2007)
An examination of the attempts by governments around the world to make Holocaust Revisionism a crime by law.
Germar Rudolf â€“ Holocaust Revisionist in Exile
Holocaust History Project
What really happened in the camps narrated by Jim Rizoli
Automotive engineer Fritz Berg: Diesels, Gaswagons & Zyklon-B
Carlos W. Porter â€“ Made in Russia: The Holocaust
David McCaldenâ€™s Auschwitz: The Holocaust Revisited
Zionismâ€™s Holocaustianity Big Lie
Hard Facts of The Holocaust
The â€œHolohoaxâ€ exposed in 30 minutes
Introduction to Holocaust revisionism
The Problem of the Gas Chambers
Short Documentary: Nazi Gas Chambers Exposed
Auschwitz versus Science: a documentary about the gas chambers and crematoria of the Holocaust
The Holocaust: a summary in 30 minutes
True Holocaust FactsÂ
Jewish Holocaust: The Truth
The Fake Chimney at Auschwitz
Auschwitz Fake Gas Chamber
Jim Rizoli gives Auschwitz TourÂ
Auschwitz Deaths lowered againâ€¦â€¦
Bishop Williamson â€“ Not one Jew was killed in a gas chamber
â€œSIX MILLION JEWSâ€ reference in ten newspapers between 1915-1938
The holocaust before the holocaust (documentary film)
More premature holocaust stories
Germar Rudolf â€“ The Ugly Truth Radio Interview 1 of 2
Germar Rudolf â€“ The Ugly Truth Radio Interview 2 of 2
Germar Rudolf interview with Deanna Spingola June 5, 2012
Germar Rudolf interview with Deanna Spingola November 14, 2013
Freedom, Repression and Historical Revisionism: An Interview With Professor Robert Faurisson
Dr. Fredrick TÃ¶ben Talks About Questioning The Holocaustâ„¢
Dr. Fredrick TÃ¶ben Interviewed on Inside The Eye Live with Dennis Fetcho
Friedrich Paul Berg â€“ Revisiting the Holocaust Claims Part 1
Friedrich Paul Berg â€“ Revisiting the Holocaust Claims Part 2
Interview with Victor Thorn author of â€˜The Holocaust Hoax Exposed: Debunking the 20th Centuryâ€™s Biggest Lieâ€™
Professor Robert Faurisson â€“ The Victories of Revisionism
EXPERT SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL REPORTS
THE LEUCHTER REPORTS: CRITICAL EDITION
By Fred Leuchter, Robert Faurisson and Germar Rudolf. New third revised edition. Between 1988 and 1991, U.S. expert on execution technologies Fred Leuchter wrote four expert reports addressing whether the Third Reich operated homicidal gas chambers. The first report on Auschwitz and Majdanek became world famous. Based on chemical analyses of wall samples and on various technical arguments, Leuchter concluded that the locations investigated â€œcould not have then been, or now, be utilized or seriously considered to function as execution gas chambers.â€
THE RUDOLF REPORT â€” EXPERT REPORT ON CHEMICAL AND TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE â€œGAS CHAMBERSâ€ OF AUSCHWITZ
Germar Rudolf is a highly qualified chemist who in the winter of 1990-91, while working toward a doctorate in chemistry at the renowned Max Planck Institute for Solid State Physics in Stuttgart (Oct. 1990-June 1993), he began a scientific investigation of the credibility of the Leuchter Report. His detailed chemical analysis concludes that hydrocyanic acid was not used at Auschwitz. His report strengthens the findings of gas chamber expert, Fred Leuchter.
DISSECTING THE HOLOCAUST BY GERMAR RUDOLF
Dissecting the Holocaust applies state-of-the-art scientific technique and classic methods of detection to investigate the alleged murder of millions of Jews by Germans during World War II. In 22 contributions of each ca. 30 pages, the 17 authors dissect generally accepted paradigms of the â€˜Holocaustâ€™. The blockbuster anthology that struck Holocaust orthodoxy a body blow from which it has never recovered. Dissecting marshals the work of more than a dozen researchers to subject the conventional historiography of the â€œgas chambersâ€, the â€œsix millionâ€, the postwar trials, and other linchpins of the extermination story to careful, precise, methodical, and withering analysis. Germar Rudolf on how chemical analysis gravely weakens the case for gassing in the Auschwitz-Birkenau crematoria, Carlo Mattogno and Franco Deana on the crematory ovens of Auschwitz, Robert Faurisson, Manfred KÃ¶hler, and Claus Jordan on how testimony was coerced and convictions manufactured, Fritz Berg, Ingrid Weckert, Carlo Mattogno, and Arnulf Neumaier on the technical and evidentiary absurdities of gassing claims for German trucks in gas chambers and at Majdanek and Treblinka, Udo Walendy and John Ball on analysis of photos alleged to depict the crimes or their locations, Rudolf on the evidence for Jewish losses during WWII, JÃ¼rgen Graf on myths about the concentration camps, and more. Dissectingâ€™s handsome design and format lend themselves well to the numerous illustrations, charts, and diagrams with which these leading revisionists advance the wealth of evidence the book offers against the Holocaust myth. This is a book â€” the book â€” that every revisionist needs to own, and to read.
THE LÃœFTL REPORT: AN AUSTRIAN ENGINEERâ€™S REPORT ON THE â€œGAS CHAMBERSâ€ OF AUSCHWITZ AND MAUTHAUSEN
In March 1992, a prominent Austrian engineer made headlines when a report he had written about alleged German wartime gas chambers was made public. Walter LÃ¼ftl concluded in his controversial report, â€œHolocaust: Belief and Facts,â€ that the well-known stories of mass extermination of Jews in gas chambers at the wartime camps of Auschwitz and Mauthausen are impossible for technical reasons and because they are incompatible with observable laws of nature. LÃ¼ftlâ€™s report is further authoritative confirmation of the findings of American gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter, who testified about his on-site investigation of the supposed â€œgas chambersâ€ of Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek in the 1988 trial of German-Canadian publicist Ernst ZÃ¼ndel. LÃ¼ftlâ€™s report also corroborates Leuchterâ€™s findings from his 1989 investigation of the supposed extermination â€œgas chamberâ€ at the Mauthausen camp.
GERMAR RUDOLF, CARLO MATTOGNO: AUSCHWITZ LIES â€” LEGENDS, LIES, AND PREJUDICES ON THE HOLOCAUST
Untruths and mainstream propaganda abound when it comes to the Auschwitz WWII German labor camp. Here are just a few:
1. French biochemist G. Wellers claimed he exposed The Leuchter Report as fallacious, but in truth he exposed only his own grotesque incompetence;
2. Polish researcher Prof. J. Markiewicz said he proved that Zyklon B was used in the gas chambers of Auschwitz, but Markiewicz was found to have fabricated his results;
3. Chemist Dr. Richard Green declared that Revisionistsâ€™ chemical arguments were flawed, yet Green was forced to admit that Revisionists were right after all;
4. Prof. Zimmerman alleged that the crematories in Auschwitz could cremate all victims of the claimed massmurder. But in truth, accountant Zimmerman proved only his lack of expertise on the subject;
5. Profs. M. Shermer and A. Grobman said they could refute the entire array of Revisionist arguments. But in reality they covered only a tiny fraction of Revisionist argumentsâ€”and botched their attempts at refutation;
6. Keren, McCarthy and Mazal found the â€œHoles of Death,â€ saying they proved the existence of the Auschwitz gas chambers. But no, they twisted evidence to support their case and suppressed the facts.
These and many other untruths about Auschwitz are exposed for what they are: political lies created to ostracize dissident historians and keep the Western world in Holocaust servitude.
AUSCHWITZ: THE END OF A LEGEND: HOW WAS SUCH MASS MURDER TECHNICALLY POSSIBLE? (CRITIQUE ON PRESSACâ€™S AUSCHWITZ BOOKS)
In this meticulously written work, Italian scholar Carlo Mattogno demolishes the boldest attempt yet to answer the revisionist critique of the Auschwitz extermination story. Carlo Mattogno has performed yeoman service for the cause of truth by showing how unjustified Jean-Claude Pressac is in reviving once more the old legend that there really were gas chambers used for the mass annihilation of millions of Jews at Auschwitz. He shows how Pressac has misinterpreted his data and has thereby in reality been a â€œcrypto-revisionist,â€ rather than a true â€œexterminationist.â€ In his confused argumentation, Pressac has demonstrated ignorance of the structure and functioning of both crematory ovens and gas chambers, and of the nature and use of the disinfectant Zyklon B. Pressacâ€™s use of such statistics as exist is arbitrary and largely fanciful, resulting in a down-sizing of the number of alleged victims. Where information does not exist, Pressac invents it, often with mutually contradictory arguments in different parts of his presentation (e.g. concerning the purpose and use of the crematoria as supposedly intended by the SS). With his relentless deconstruction of Pressacâ€™s affirmations and interpretations, and his demonstration of Pressacâ€™s incompetence, Mattogno has hammered one more nail into the coffin of the old myth of the mass murder of Jews at Auschwitz and elsewhere.
â€” A. Dibert, pen name of a professor emeritus at an Ivy League university.
CARLO MATTOGNO: AUSCHWITZ â€” THE CASE FOR SANITY
In 1993 Jewish theologian Deborah Lipstadt called British historian David Irving a â€œHolocaust denier.â€ Irving sued her for libel in return. Subsequently a court case unfolded in England which attracted the attention of the worldâ€™s mass media in 2000. The sharpest weapon in Lipstadtâ€™s defense arsenal was Jewish art historian Robert van Pelt, who presented an expert report claiming to refute revisionist assertions about Auschwitz. Because Irving had neither the support by any expert witnesses nor was he himself an expert on the Holocaust, he inevitable lost the case. Robert van Pelt was therefore praised as the defeater of revisionism. When he published his revised expert report in his book The Case for Auschwitz in 2002, he even advanced to the foremost expert on Auschwitz in the publicâ€™s eyes. Mattognoâ€™s Auschwitz: the Case for Sanity is the revisionist response to Robert van Pelt. Its first revelation is that van Pelt has committed plagiarism: he plundered and basically regurgitated the research results published in 1989 and 1993 by French researcher Jean-Claude Pressac â€“ yet without naming his source even once. On more than 700 pages, Mattogno thoroughly scrutinizes van Peltâ€™s contorted assertions by juxtaposing them to material and documentary facts. Mattognoâ€™s analysis is devastating for van Pelt, as it reveals that van Peltâ€™s study of Auschwitz ignores crucial counter-arguments, fails to approach pivotal technical issues with technical means, is highly inconsistent, uses deceptive methods, presents conflicting sources without due source criticism, deforms all sources to serve the authorâ€™s perspective, and reveals a shockingly threadbare knowledge of the history of Auschwitz. Mattogno therefore concludes: â€œThe Case for Auschwitz is neither a scholarly nor a historical work; it is only a biased journalistic assemblage of poorly understood and poorly interpreted historical sources.â€ This is a book of prime political and scholarly importance, as it delivers the exterminationistsâ€™ case the most devastating blow ever!
CARLO MATTOGNO: THE CREMATORY OVENS OF AUSCHWITZ
An exhaustive technical study of cremation technology in general and of the crematory ovens of Auschwitz in particular. Next to the alleged â€œgas chambers,â€ these ovens are claimed to have been the main â€œweapon of crimeâ€ said to have destroyed the traces of up to a million murdered individuals. On a sound and thoroughly documented base of technical literature, extant wartime documents and material traces Mattogno reveals the true hygienic function, i.e. the benign nature of the crematories of Auschwitz.
GERMAR RUDOLF: LECTURES ON THE HOLOCAUST: CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES CROSS EXAMINED
This book was written to fit the need of both those who have no in-depth knowledge of the Holocaust or of revisionism, as well as for well-versed readers familiar with revisionism. Anyone who wants to bring himself up to date on revisionist scholarship, but does not want to read all the special studies that were published during the past ten years, needs this book! The bookâ€™s style is unique: It is a dialogue between the lecturer and the reactions of the audience. Rudolf introduces the most important arguments and counter arguments of Holocaust revisionism. The audience reacts with supportive, skeptical, and also hostile questions. The Lectures read like an exciting real-life exchange between persons of various points of view. The usual moral, political, and pseudo-scientific arguments against revisionism are addressed and refuted. This book resembles an entertaining collection of answers to frequently asked questions on the Holocaust. With generous references to a vast bibliography, this easy-to-understand book is the best introduction into this taboo topic for both readers unfamiliar with the topic and for those wanting to know more.
BREAKING THE SPELL: THE HOLOCAUST, MYTH & REALITY
In 1941, British Intelligence analysts cracked the German â€œEnigmaâ€ code. This undermined the German war effort â€“ but also threw new light on day-by-day events in the Nazi concentration camp system. Between January 1942 and January 1943, encrypted radio communications between those camps and the Berlin headquarters were intercepted and decrypted. Oddly enough, historians have largely ignored the information furnished in these intercepts relating to â€œarrivals,â€ â€œdepartures,â€ recorded deaths and other events at these camps. The only reasonable explanation for this embarrassing omission is that the intercepted data seriously contradicts, even refutes, the orthodox â€œHolocaustâ€ narrative. The revealed information does not expose a program of mass murder and racial genocide. Quite the opposite: it reveals that the Germans were determined, desperate even, to reduce the death rate in their work camps, which was caused by catastrophic typhus epidemics. Were the British here hoodwinked by the Nazis, as some historians to this day try to claimâ€”or is the truth both simpler and more shocking? In 1988 and 1991 forensic studies threw light on the question of whether or not the claimed gas chambers at Auschwitz had served as slaughter houses for hundreds of thousands of people. Both studies had concluded that the only facilities where Zyklon B gas had been used were hygienic rather than homicidal, killing bugs rather than Jews. Needless to say that these iconoclastic studies were ignored or in some countries even outlawed, and that their authors were ostracized and even imprisoned. Dr. Kollerstrom, a science historian, has taken these studies, which are in obvious, stark contrast to the widely accepted narrative, as a starting point for his own endeavour into the land of taboo. After he had published a brief paper summarizing what he thought the data forced him to conclude, he was thrown out of his College where he had been a member of staff for eleven years. In his new book Breaking the Spell, Dr. Kollerstrom shows that â€œwitness statementsâ€ supporting the human gas chamber narrative clearly clash with the available scientific data. He juxtaposes the commonly accepted ideas about a Nazi extermination policy toward the Jews with a wide array of mostly unchallenged, but usually unmentioned evidence pointing in a quite different direction, for instance: Zyklon B is a buzz word for the claimed Nazi mass murder, but all non-anecdotal evidence proves that this chemical was merely used as a pesticide in order to improve the inmatesâ€™ health and reduce, not increase, camp mortality. Zyklon B applied in delousing chambers formed chemical compounds detectable to this day. No such compounds can be found, but ought to be expected, in the claimed homicidal gas chambers. The UKâ€™s intelligence decrypts prove that the German camp authorities were desperately trying to save their inmatesâ€™ lives. â€œSix Million Jews threatened or killedâ€: read 167 quotes from newspapers with that â€œnewsâ€ spanning from 1900 to 1945, with a peak after World War ONE! Yes, one, not two! Germany has paid compensation to millions of Nazi victims, and Israel has implicitly admitted that many million Jews survived the Holocaust. A British archaeological team looked for traces of the claimed 800,000 victims of the Treblinka campâ€”and came back empty-handed. Dr. Kollerstrom concludes that the history of the Nazi â€œHolocaustâ€ has been written by the victors with ulterior motives and that this history is distorted, exaggerated and largely wrong. He asserts that this history is, in truth, a great lie that distorts our common perceived reality and misdirects human history to this very day.
Kindle & Paperback: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Breaking-Spell-Holocaust-Myth-Reality-ebook/dp/B00Q8UK8BM/
ARTHUR R. BUTZ: THE HOAX OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY
First published in 1976, this slightly revised and enhanced edition of The Hoax of the Twentieth Century is the seminal work of â€œHolocaustâ€ revisionism and still the most widely read on the subject. In 502 pages of penetrating study and lucid commentary, Dr. Butz gives the reader a graduate course on the subject of the Jews of World War Two Europe â€“ concluding not only that they were not virtually wiped out, but whatâ€™s more, that no evidence exists to date to confirm that there was ever any attempt to do so.
THE FIRST HOLOCAUST: HOLOCAUST CLAIMS DURING AND AFTER WORLD WAR ONE
â€œThe First Holocaustâ€ by Don Heddesheimer is a critical work documenting the continuous Jewish attempts at floating out Holocaust propaganda before, during and after World War One, often invoking the magical â€œ6,000,000â€ figure and using the term â€œHolocaustâ€. Of course, these clever propagandists have since accomplished their goal of establishing the outrageous myth of the Jewish Holocaustâ„¢ in the public consciousness following the end of WW2. In large part due to fictional Hollywood movies like â€œShindlerâ€™s Listâ€.
THE HOLOCAUST DOGMA OF JUDAISM BY BEN WEINTRAUB
The book â€œThe Holocaust Dogma of Judaismâ€ describes how the 6 million number is kabbalistically derived. 600,000 souls leaving Egypt multiplied by the 10 sephiroth. The number 6 million is a symbolic number with a religious meaning and the Holocaust is part of the religious dogma of Judaism. The symbolic 6,000,000 and the special term, holocaust, were carefully created, crafted and fabricated by those who follow undeniably Talmudic-Kabalistic doctrines. Jewish author, Benjamen Blech, confirmed this reality in his book â€œThe Secrets of Hebrew Wordsâ€.
THE MYTH OF THE SIX MILLION BY PROF. DAVID HOGGAN
This book was published anonymously in 1969, but it is now a common knowledge that the author of this pioneering little book was Prof. David L. Hoggan, a history professor at Stanford University. It almost seems a precursor to the explosive report Did Six Million Really Die? as it lays out common-sense and little known facts about the real policies of Third Reich Germany and its policies towards repatriating Jews out of Germany.
THE HOLOCAUST STORY AND THE LIES OF ULYSSES BY PAUL RASSINIER
Paul Rassinier was arrested by the Gestapo in October 1943 and deported to Germany, where he was held prisoner until the end of the war in Buchenwald and Dora concentration camps. Rassinier was profoundly distressed by the many lies and myths about the concentration camps that were being circulated. He wrote: â€œThen one day I realized that a false picture of the German camps had been created and that the problem of the concentration camps was a universal one, not just one that could be disposed of by placing it on the doorstep of the National Socialists. The deportees â€” many of whom were Communists â€” had been largely responsible for leading international political thinking to such an erroneous conclusion. I suddenly felt that by remaining silent I was an accomplice to a dangerous influence. With regard to gas chambers, the almost endless procession of false witnesses and of falsified documents to which I have invited the readerâ€™s attention during this long study, proves, nevertheless, only one thing: never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the Third Reich intend to order â€” or, in fact, order â€” the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner.â€
DID SIX MILLION REALLY DIE?
Did Six Million Really Die? was originally published by the Historical Review Press in England in 1974. It was an immediate success and even though no bookshop would stock it, word spread fast. Did Six Million Really Die? is the book for which Ernst ZÃ¼ndel was taken to court in Canada for merely reprinting; leading to the two great Holocaust trials of 1985 and 1988 in which the Holocaust was fully exposed in court by Ernst ZÃ¼ndel and his excellent defence team represented by distinguished attorney Doug Christie. Did Six Million Really Die? is also the book for which gifted French teacher FranÃ§ois Duprat was murdered in 1978 for publishing the first French translation.
THE GREAT HOLOCAUST TRIAL: The Landmark Battle for Freedom of Speech
The record of the persecution of German-Canadian heretic Ernst ZÃ¼ndel by a de facto Sanhedrin, for publishing the book, Did Six Million Really Die? is almost too fantastic to countenance. ZÃ¼ndel faced two years in prison if convicted. His defense was initially regarded by the press and public as preposterous. â€œHow can anyone deny the Holocaust?â€ was the incredulous response to the news that ZÃ¼ndel would vigorously defend himself and the free speech rights of all Canadians. The trial was expected to be a quick and ignominious rout of ZÃ¼ndel and his supporters. But in a startling reversal, the â€œsurvivorsâ€ who had appeared in court in order to send him to jail, had to submit their â€œtestimonyâ€ to scrutiny, the rules of evidence and cross-examination, something that had never happened before and has never happened since. Canadians grew ever more surprised and shocked at the amazing admissions which the defense team elicited from the supposed â€œeyewitnessesâ€ to the homicidal gas chambers. As a result, television reporters and print journalists who covered the trial for more than eight weeks in 1985 produced broadcasts and news reports that turned Canada upside down. ZÃ¼ndel was tried again in 1988. This time he assembled the â€˜Leutcher Report,â€™ an on-site forensic examination of Auschwitz by â€˜Mr. Death,â€™ Fred Leutcher, capital punishment engineer for the U.S. prison system. When Zundel could not be silenced by the Canadian courts, his enemies turned to bombs, arson and the dungeons of Zionist Germany.
The Great Holocaust Trial is the only revisionist account of Ernst ZÃ¼ndelâ€™s first trial, one of the few times in history when so-called â€œHolocaust survivorsâ€ were subjected to cross-examination by a counsel for the defense as astute, fearless and well-informed as Douglas Christie.
ROBERT FAURISSON: WITNESSES TO THE GAS CHAMBERS OF AUSCHWITZ
Eyewitness testimony must always be verified. There are two essential means of verifying such testimony in criminal cases: confronting the account with the material elements (in particular, with expertise as to the crime weapon), and the detailed cross-examination of the witness on what he/she purports to have seen. Thus, in the proceedings where it had been a question of the homicidal gas chambers of Auschwitz, no judge nor any attorney was able to claim any kind of expertise regarding the weapon of the crime; moreover, no lawyer ever cross-examined the witnesses by asking them to describe with precision even one of these chemical slaughter-houses. That is, up until 1985. When witnesses that year were finally cross-examined on these subjects during the first ZÃ¼ndel trial in Toronto, their rout was total. Because of this resounding set-back and by reason of other calamities previous to or following 1985, the defenders of the thesis of Jewish extermination have begun to abandon a history of Auschwitz primarily founded on testimonies and are obliging themselves, at the present time, to replace it with a scientific basis, or, at least, one which appears scientific, founded on factual research and proofs. The â€˜testimonial historyâ€™ of Auschwitz in the manner of Elie Wiesel and Claude Lanzmann is discredited.
THE GAS CHAMBER OF SHERLOCK HOLMES BY SAMUEL CROWELL
Among scholars and the general public, the prevailing consensus holds that millions of European Jews were sent to death in gas chambers as part of an official Nazi policy of mass extermination during the Second World War. So entrenched is this consensus that throughout the Western world those who publicly question its accuracy are now routinely subject to censorship, academic censure, and even criminal prosecution. In contemporary society, no other species of dissident scholarship is met with comparably illiberal reaction.
In an intellectual atmosphere thus poisoned by acrimony and haunted by the specter of persecution, The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes stands as a calm, deftly reasoned, and highly original affirmation of intellectual freedom. Drawing on extensive empirical and documentary evidence as well as methods of cultural criticism conventionally eschewed by field historians, Samuel Crowell argues that the â€œcanonical&â€ Holocaust gassing claim can be traced to a fateful crisis of modernism â€” a crisis revealed in popular texts and long-forgotten cultural ephemera. Spanning from the earliest broadcast rumors to the extermination narrative that was sealed at Nuremberg, Crowell s probing analysis permits us to consider how a grim narrative emerged and evolved in the cyclonic momentum of an era marked by social upheaval, total war, and unprecedented technological change.
Though it has achieved the status of an underground classic, The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes has until now been available only in samizdat editions and on the Internet. This definitive edition has been updated and revised and includes a new introduction by the author. In addition to the title essay, supplemental texts include an appended restatement of Crowell s important monograph, â€œBomb Shelters at Birkenau,â€ as well as the never-before-published essay, â€œThe Holocaust in Retrospect.â€
(2011 Edition) Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/The-Chamber-Sherlock-Holmes-Understanding/dp/1616583479
(2000 Edition) PDF: http://codoh.com/media/files/downloads/xsherlock.pdf
Review by Richard A. Widmann:http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2011/volume_3/number_2/gas_chamber_of_sherlock_holmes_1.php
DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A NEW LOOK AT BOTH SIDES
This is a book about the Holocaust, and about two competing views of that event. On the one hand we have the traditional, orthodox view: the six million JewishÂ casualties, the gas chambers, the cremation ovens and mass graves. Traditional historians have thousands of surviving witnesses and the weight of history on their side. On the other hand there is a small, renegade band of writers and researchers who refuse to accept large parts of this story. These revisionists, as they call themselves, present counter-evidence and ask tough questions. They are beginning to outline a new and different narrative. Thus there has emerged something of a debate â€” a debate of historic significance. This is no peripheral clash between two arcane schools of thought, regarding some obscure details of World War II. It is about history, of course, but it also speaks to fundamental issues of our time: freedom of speech and press, the operation of mass media, manipulation of public opinion, political and economic power structures, and the coercive abilities of the State. It is an astonishingly rancorous and controversial debate, with far-reaching implications.
THE HOLOCAUST HOAX EXPOSED: DEBUNKING THE 20TH CENTURYâ€™S BIGGEST LIE
Today, if a book similar to this one were published in Europe, its author would be arrested and imprisoned. Their crime: simply questioning the so-called holocaust where six million Jews were allegedly exterminated during WW II. Indeed, researchers have endured solitary confinement, brutal beatings by Jewish assailants, ongoing harassment, lengthy court battles, career suicide, and media attacks directed against their work all because they presented a revisionist history of this pivotal event. Other writers have been the victims of hate crimes, extensive smear campaigns, fines, death threats, and monetary rewards placed upon their heads after going into hiding. The perpetrators behind these jack-booted Thought Police tactics are an entire holohoax industry devoted to suppressing factual data in favor of peddling heavy-handed doses of propaganda. Despite these obvious dangers, The Holocaust Hoax Exposed dissects every element of what has become the 20th century s most grotesque conspiracy. Covered in jarring detail is the mythology surrounding concentration camps, the truth about Zyklon B, Anne Frank s fable, how the absurd six million figure has become a laughingstock, and the betrayal by maniacal Zionists of their own Jewish people that led to their deaths (via starvation and disease) after Allied bombings cutoff supply lines to German work camps. Yet, the only way an Israeli state could be created on stolen Palestinian land following WW II was through the most outlandish lies imaginable. Consequently, the holohoax industry has become a tyrannical dictatorship that incessantly manipulates, distorts, marginalizes and manufactures false results to achieve their Machiavellian ends. By taking their hysterical obsessions to psychopathic levels, the charlatans behind this ruse make it glaringly apparent how weak their foundation is. To compensate, these intellectually dishonest con men (and women) continue to persecute revisionist historians all because they re incapable of supporting their arguments through legitimate debate. The Holocaust Hoax Exposed is the final nail in a rotting coffin that has long been buried beneath a plethora of deceit.
UDO WALENDY: FORGED WAR CRIMES MALIGN THE GERMAN NATION
Udo Walendy examines the alleged visual documentsâ€”photographsâ€”that are claimed to prove the atrocities perpetrated by the National Socialists against the Jews. The question at issue is what exactly the pictures show, whether they were retouched or whether they may even be completely fabricated, i.e., montages or drawings. A pile of dead bodies or an open mass grave, for example, can be presented as evidence for the gas chamber murders, but what is there to prove that the pictures do not in fact show the German victims of Allied air-raids, or the victims of starvation or epidemics in German or Allied camps, soldiers killed in action, victims of pogroms, or even persons killed by the Soviet secret service? Udo Walendy shows with numerous examples that the falsification of photographs for purposes of incriminating the Third Reich is rather more the rule than the exception. It is astonishing to note that there are usually many different versions of a forged photograph, which makes it easy to spot cases of alteration. Walendy shows that the photo documents analyzed by him cannot be incontestable evidence for the claims usually associated with them.
Many of the Holocaust and other WWII atrocity photographs shown in Forged War Crimes can be viewed in our public libraries, where they are presented as authentic. By comparing versions in different books and analyzing lighting and scale, this astonishing book exposes them as forgeries. They are the product of Stalinâ€™s Cold War propaganda operation and many are merely photographed drawings. For exposing fraud its author, Udo Walendy, was imprisoned in Germany. The judge told him â€œWe are sentencing you not for what you wrote, but for what you left out.â€
AUSCHWITZ: THE UNDERGROUND GUIDED TOUR. WHAT THE TOUR GUIDES DONâ€™T TELL YOU AT AUSCHWITZ-BIRKENAU
This remarkable study of Auschwitz is unlike anything yet published. Though it is purposely small in size and easy to read, it carries a powerful punch. The author visited Auschwitz as a tourist armed with a broad study of the literature surrounding the world-famous site, and from that visit has proceeded to deconstruct the Auschwitz shown to her and others as a â€œdeathâ€ or â€œexterminationâ€ camp. By taking the reader on an â€œunderground guided tourâ€ around Auschwitz-Birkenau, she clearly demonstrates it to be, at varying times and locations within the perimeters, a simple labor, concentration and transit camp for political prisoners, where the health of the inmates was a prime concern of the camp authorities. Sound unbelievable? After reading this carefully researched book, you will see the horror stories for so long spread about Auschwitz-Birkenau in a new, more skeptical, light, and you may very well be so impressed youâ€™ll want to share your new vision with others. A cautiously written work that moves toward a surprising conclusion, leaving us pondering how so much that is not true has seeped into our consciousness as â€œfact.â€ Lavishly illustrated.
Each book can be downloaded as a free PDF file from each bookâ€™s dedicated webpage:http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1
Free Book Archive of VHO.ORG
Historical Revisionism â€“ International and Independent Scientific Historical Researchhttp://vho.org/dl/ENG.html
THE â€œGAS CHAMBERâ€ SHOWN AT AUSCHWITZ WAS NEVER A GAS CHAMBER
Since 1948, the year of the founding by Polish Communist authorities of the Auschwitz State Museum, millions of tourists â€” 500,000 visitors per year in the early 1990s â€” have visited the crematory building of the main camp (Auschwitz I) with its â€œgas chamberâ€ room. Museum guides present this crematory structure (Krema) and its â€œgas chamberâ€ as genuine, but skeptical visitors who ask impertinent questions are told, since my own visits of 1975 and 1976, that this is, in fact, a â€œreconstruction,â€ which we are further informed is an identical replica of the original. In reality, the whole is neither authentic nor an identical replica of the original. In 1941-42, the Krema was a very conventional crematory facility with, notably, a cool morgue room for temporary storage of corpses, and an incineration block with six ovens. In 1943-44, the six ovens were done away with and the morgue room, along with other parts of the building, were transformed into an air-raid shelter with a surgical operating room serving the nearby SS hospital.
Existing blueprints show that the alleged gas chamber was in fact a morgue that was later converted into an air raid shelter.
State 1 â€“ From 1940 to 1943, it was a Leichenhalle (a cold storage room for bodies, with a washroom, etc.);
State 2 â€“ From June 1944 to January 1945, a LuftschÃ¼tzbunker fÃ¼r SS-Revier mit einem Operationsraum (an air-raid shelter for the SS-hospital with an operating room).
The crematorium had been taken out of service on 19 July 1943, whereas the conversion into an air-raid shelter took place in October 1944.
When Auschwitz came within the range of Allied bombers in 1944 and Monowitz was actually bombed on 13 September of that year, the Germans decided to convert the old crematorium, which had been used as a warehouse since it was put out of service, into an operating room equipped with an air raid bunker for the SS hospital. In so doing, they built a new entrance.
Auschwitz was bombed in May, 1943
The first airstrike on I.G. Auschwitz carried out by several Allied aircraft took place during the night of May 4, 1943. One watchtower at the Buna/Monowitz concentration camp came under machine-gun fire, and nine bombs fell near the prisonersâ€™ camp without causing any damage. This strike probably was the work of the Red Armyâ€™s air force, as the range of the British and American bomber wings in 1943 did not yet extend as far as Auschwitz.
There is one report of SS being killed in an air raid in the order of the commandant of 6 September 1944 of Monowitz: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=6038&p=44537#p42551 There was another heavy air attack on Auschwitz-Monowitz on September 13th, 1944, in which 12 men of the SS had been killed: http://meidling-forum.at/forum/viewtopic.php?p=26478&sid=e5d924c11130fb003f0adb2d7201f3b5#26478
In 1948, the crematorium was once again converted, the SovietsÂ demolished the interior dividing walls, removed the bathroom facilities (there are clear marks on the walls and floors showing where walls had once stood and toilets had once been) and the former morgue was merged with the adjacent room. The Soviets cut four crude holes in the ceiling (the fake â€œZyklon-B introduction holesâ€) and built a fake brick chimney outside without even bothering to connect it to the building. They even left the original doors in place at either end which are flimsy wooden doors with a large glass pane that opens inwards. The â€œchamberâ€ room is also connected to the crematoria with no door in-between the two rooms. There is also a large window in the â€œchamber.â€ The location of the â€œchamberâ€ was also conspicuous, situated extremely close to the hospital and other buildings. The poison gas would have infected the whole area. It was then alleged by the Soviets, Americans and British that mass murders with poison gas were committed here in 1941-1942.
This is the door to the â€œgas chamberâ€ at Auschwitz â€“ Yes, that is a window, and it is unbarred. The door itself is a typical wooden office door, it is not sealed. A visitor asked a guide why the prisoners didnâ€™t break the window and escape, the guide replied that an armed guard was stationed outside the door. That is, they really expect people to believe that this was a â€œgas chamberâ€, and, amazingly, people do. The â€œgas chamberâ€ is actually a morgue room in a crematorium. The problem for the believer is that since there were no plans or architectural drawings for gas chambers and if the rooms that were found were no longer designed nor functioning as gas chambers, with what information was the room â€œrestoredâ€? If the gas chamber was shut down in 1942/43, and not converted back into a gas chamber until after the war by the Soviets, then where were the people gassed during 1943/44?
The fake Auschwitz chimney which is not connected to the building
No extraction system
No blue staining on the walls from Zyklon-B
The fact it was never a gas chamber has been admitted by the Auschwitz museum. Dr. Franciszek Piper, former senior curator and director of the Auschwitz State Museum admitted on videotape that the holes in the ceiling that were purportedly used to throw Zyklon-B into the rooms used for â€œhomicidal gas chambersâ€ were added AFTER the war, as was the chimney that is built near to, but NOT even attached to, the supposed â€œgas chamberâ€ building, a building that was in actuality used as a air raid shelter â€“ to PROTECT the inmates from the Allied bombings.
In 1992 a young Jewish (secular) atheist Holocaust revisionist posing as a believer corners the curator of the Auschwitz Holocaust Museum Dr. Franciszek Piper with some very tough questions about the Holocaust at Auschwitz. He is forced to admit that the â€œgas chamberâ€ was really built by the Soviets after the war.
Auschwitz Museum Director Reveals â€˜Gas Chamberâ€™ Hoax
Fake â€˜Gas Chamberâ€™
Each year for decades, tens of thousands of visitors to Auschwitz have been shown an execution â€œgas chamberâ€ in the main camp, supposedly in its â€œoriginal state.â€ In January 1995 the prestigious French weekly magazine Lâ€™Express acknowledged that â€œeverythingâ€ about this â€œgas chamberâ€ is â€œfalse,â€ and that it is in fact a deceitful postwar reconstruction.
Auschwitz I â€˜gas chamberâ€™ (Krema I)
Does it really matter that the Soviets built the Auschwitz gas chamber after WWII?
Dachau Museum 1998 with sign claiming that this room was never used as a gas chamber.
The infamous Dachau gas chamber sign rediscovered
German Officer Forced To Build A Gas Chamber After The War
Gerhart Schirmer, a retired Bundeswehr officer was captured in 1945 by the Russians and held in Sachsenhausen which the Russians continued to use as a prison. Although the War and Nazism were over, Schirmer and a few fellow-prisoners were forced to construct a gas chamber and execution room, to show the world what the Nazis had done. He described his experiences in a booklet entitled â€˜Sachsenhausen â€“ Workuta, Zehn Jahre in den FÃ¤ngen der Sowjetsâ€™ (Grabert Verlag, TÃ¼bingen, 1992).
The â€˜False Newsâ€™ Trial of Ernst ZÃ¼ndel â€” 1988
Witnesses for the Defense
The alleged gas chamber was located next to the SS Hospital building and the Gestapo buildings. There were two entrances to the alleged gas chamber. (18-4279) The first door, which had a peephole in it, opened into a small vestibule. Anyone looking through the peephole did not see into the alleged gas chamber, but saw only a concrete wall approximately one and a half metres away. (18-4294, 4299) Felderer testified that the peephole had significance in exterminationist literature because the Nazis were supposed to have watched with great pleasure as the people died. (18-4295) Museum officials eventually admitted to Felderer that the entire â€œgas chamberâ€ at Auschwitz I was rebuilt in various stages to â€œhelpâ€ tourists understand what occurred. (18-4298)
Felderer concluded that there had never been any gas chamber at Auschwitz I and that the building had been nothing more than a crematory and morgue, later altered in 1943 to an air-raid shelter with a surgical room. Felderer advised ZÃ¼ndel of his conclusions (19-4356)
1972: A Somewhat Different Auschwitz Trial
Contractors of Auschwitz Tried in Vienna
Engineerâ€™s Deathbed Confession: We Built Morgues, not Gas Chambers
Walter Schreiber worked as a senior engineer in the branch office in Kattowitz for the construction activities of his firm and was also responsible for constructions in the concentration camp Auschwitz and its sub-camps.Â He was interviewed about Auschwitz in the year 1998 by Dipl.-Ing. Walter LÃ¼ftl, who had been President of the Austrian Society of Civil Engineers until 1992.
LÃ¼ftl.: Do you know anything about introduction hatches in the reinforced concrete ceilings?
Schreiber.: No, not from memory. But since these cellars were also intended to serve as air raid shelters as a secondary purpose, introduction holes would have been counter-productive. I would certainly have objected to such an arrangement.
The reality is that there never did exist and does not exist today in any of the camps an example of a real gas chamber. Robert Faurisson asks the Holohoax propagandists to â€œshow me or draw me a gas chamber?â€ Nobody has answered his request because they canâ€™t because were no gas chambers.
In the famous Ernst ZÃ¼ndel court trial of 1988, expert witness Raul Hilberg was at a loss:
â€œCan you give me one scientific report that shows the existence of gas chambers anywhere in Nazi-occupied territory?â€ defence counsel Doug Christie asked Hilberg in a day-long rapid fire of cross-examination.Â â€œI am at a loss,â€ Hilberg replied.Â â€œYou are (at a loss) because you canâ€™t,â€ Christie said.Â â€œThe witness countered that there are aerial photographs of concentration camps, examples of ruined or reconstructed gas chambers, German industrial documents describing the lethal nature of various gases and filters for gas masks were found at the camps.â€Â During this trial, not a single eye witness for the plaintiff could be found.
Also during the trial an alleged â€œeyewitnessâ€ to the gas chamber at Auschwitz was asked to point on a map where the gas chamber was located. He was unable to point to where the mythical gas chamber was located on the map since there had been no gas chamber in reality.
AUSCHWITZ: MYTHS AND FACTS
Auschwitz is regarded as the most notorious Nazi extermination center. During World War II, we are told, hundreds of thousands of prisoners â€” most of them Jewish â€” were systematically killed there, especially in gas chambers. Auschwitz was unquestionably a place of horror, where many perished under terrible circumstances. And yet, much of what has been said about the camp is exaggerated or untrue. A closer look at the facts calls into question at least some aspects of its reputation as a center of systematic mass extermination.
Concentration Camp Money
â€˜Lagergeldâ€™ used to Pay Prisoners for Their Work
Far from being the â€œdeath campsâ€ as you have heard so often, places like Auschwitz, Dachau and Buchenwald were not in the business of extermination. They were work camps, critical to the German war effort. But did you know that the Jewish workers were compensated for their labor with scrip printed specifically for their use in stores, canteens and even brothels? The prisoner monetary system was conceived in ghettos such as Lodz, carried to camps such as Auschwitz and Dachau and still existed in the displaced persons camps that were established by the Allies after World War II. Here is the story of the money the court historians do not want you to even suspect existed.
Controversy of the Auschwitz Swimming Pool
The Auschwitz Lies
THE TECHNICAL IMPLAUSIBILITY OF THE ALLEGED GAS CHAMBERS AND OF THE USE OF ZYKLON-B
The entire gas chamber story is technically implausible. The official story is that Zyklon-B pellets were dropped through holes in the roof onto the cold concrete floor. However the boiling point of the hydrogen cyanide (HCN) in Zyklon B is 26ÂºC, the evaporation of HCN from Zyklon-B is probably too slow to kill humans in gas chambers in the way it has been alleged if the gas chamber temperature is below 26ÂºC. To kill quickly (within minutes), the gas chamber probably needs to be heated to at least 26ÂºC, but the kind of heating device required was not found in Auschwitz. Moreover the witnesses said it was not used at all, and claimed that the SS man just used to pour Zyklon-B through four holes in the roof. Some Holocaust-accusers explain that by saying that the human bodies in the gas chamber provided the required heating. But that is a very far-fetched â€œexplanationâ€, since the human body is about 36ÂºC warm, it is unlikely that the human bodies are able to heat a room of â€“ say- 10ÂºC in winter to 26ÂºC.
There needs to be a heating system to heat the Zyklon-B pellets. There needs to be a means of diffusing the gas into the chamber. The gas chamber needs to be hermetically sealed to prevent the gas from escaping including the holes in the roof, the doors and any other gaps as well as light fittings. There needs to be an extraction system to remove the gas from the chamber. There needs to be a very tall chimney for the gas to safely be expelled. There needs to be an extremely strong and thick steel door which can withstand the pressure of hundreds of people pushing against it trying to escape. None of these requirements existed or exist today at Auschwitz. None of these requirements were found by Fred Leuchter, Germar Rudolf, Walter LÃ¼ftl, Fredrick TÃ¶ben, Carlo Mattogno, Robert Faurisson, Ernst ZÃ¼ndel, David Cole and others who have carried out a technical inspection of the alleged â€œgas chambersâ€ â€“ which are admitted as never being a gas chamber.
Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged â€œgas chambersâ€ totalling some 1693 per week and assuming these facilities could support gas executions it would have required 68 years to execute the alleged number of six million persons.
The Gas Chambers of Auschwitz Appear to be Physically Inconceivable
Reexamining the â€œGas Chamberâ€ of Dachau
Gas Chambers: David Coleâ€™s 46 Questions About the Gas Chambers
How Zyklon-B Works
THE TECHNICALLY IMPOSSIBLE CREMATION CLAIMS
It was claimed at Nuremberg that 4 million had been disposed of in the Auschwitz camp crematoria. In 1989 that number was reduced to 1.5 million which is still a technically impossible figure. There were crematorium in each camp, but they simply didnâ€™t have the capacity.
There are 8760 hours in one year. It takes 2-3 hours to cremate a human body even with the most modern crematoria. If one crematory was operating 24 hours a day 365 days a year which is an impossible scenario you could cremate only 4380 bodies in one year. If 30 crematoria were running 24/7/365 you could cremate only 131,400 bodies in one year. If 30 crematoria were running 24/7/365 for 4 years you could cremate only 530,300 bodies.
The camps had between four and twelve ovens each giving 17,520 to 52,560 bodies per year maximum at each camp â€“ this still wouldnâ€™t be possible as you canâ€™t run these ovens non-stop without the metal fracturing. There is also the problem of fuel as each body would need about 40-50 kilograms of coke to burn â€“ there is no record of the massive amount of coke required being supplied. It is claimed that 60-70,000 people were cremated every day. This would require a huge quantity of coke. It requires 40-50 kilograms of coke to cremate one corpse which would require about 2000 tons of coke per day. The operating documents of Auschwitz concentration camp released from the Soviet archives reveal that the entire quantity of coke which was supplied for the crematoria throughout the entire period of the war was only 2,188 tons of coke which is enough to cremate only 60-70,000. Furthermore detailed aerial photographs of Auschwitz which were taken by American, British and South African planes show no signs of huge mountains of coke or huge mass graves or pits and no lines of people waiting outside a gas chamber.
Cremation specialists have confirmed that thousands of corpses could not possibly have been cremated every day throughout the spring and summer of 1944 at Auschwitz, as has often been alleged. Ivan LagacÃ©, manager of a large crematory in Canada, testified in court in April 1988 that the Auschwitz cremation story is technically impossible. The allegation that 10,000 or even 20,000 corpses were burned every day at Auschwitz in the summer of 1944 in crematories and open pits is simply â€œpreposterousâ€ and â€œbeyond the realm of reality,â€ he declared under oath.
If these crematories operated at a theoretical rate of a maximum output 24 hours a day, 7 days a week without any down time and at constant pace which is an impossible situation it would have taken at least 35 years at an impossible minimum to cremate six million persons.
â€œBy 1942-43, the liquidation of graves in all killing centers was in progress. Auschwitz transferred the corpses to the five new crematoriums, which could burn about 12,000 bodies a dayâ€
â€“ Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews page 629
â€œLagacÃ© stated that this claim was â€œpreposterousâ€ and â€œbeyond the realm of reality.â€ To claim that 46 retorts could cremate over 4,400 bodies in a day was â€œludicrous.â€ Based on his own experience, LagacÃ© testified that it would only have been possible to cremate a maximum of 184 bodies a day at Birkenau.â€
If a job needs doing, make sure its done in the most ridiculous style possible
LUDICROUS EXTERMINATION FIGURES
Auschwitz ovens: 400 corpses cremated in 5 mins
â€˜5 Million Jews Died in 1 Campâ€™
AERIAL PHOTOS OF THE CAMPS
From 1942, until the end of World War Two, the United States Airforce performed low flying, low-speed photography of all the alleged â€œdeath campsâ€ to obtain evidence of what was going on. This followed Jewish claims in the West that a mass murder was occurring. All these photographs were released in 1979 when they were declassified. None of these photographs show any sign of mass murder or disposal of millions of bodies.
ACTUAL DEATH TOLL IN ALL GERMAN CAMPS
The Nuremberg trials told us 4 million were killed at Auschwitz and this was official dogma for decades and everyone believed it as fact. Then in 1989 when the Communist system collapsed the Russians released the captured Auschwitz death records to their archives and the Poles quickly revised the death toll down to 1.5 million which is no more credible than the original 4 million lie. The Zionist controlled media still continue to tell us that 6 million Jews died.
The official Auschwitz camp death certificates revealed that the death toll for all inmates Jews and non-Jews at Auschwitz between May 1940 through to December 1944 was 74,000 of which roughly only 30,000 were Jews. Jews comprised only 23% of Auschwitz prisoners, and there were still many thousands of Jewish survivors of Auschwitz after the war.
Jews made up only around 23% of Auschwitz, only around 12% of Dachau and only around 30% of Buchenwald.
For decades after WW2 the Red Cross maintained that the estimated 270,000 deaths inside the camps resulted from malnourishment and disease of which 40% were Jews. The Allied footage of dead camp inmates are of those who died of typhus and starvation in the final weeks of the war as a result of a total breakdown of supplies due to Allied saturation bombing destroying all infrastructure.
Official records from International Red Cross prove â€œHolocaustâ€ was a fraud.
Released records, sealed for years, show â€œconcentration campâ€ death totals of only 271,301
Before and after the â€œHolocaustâ€: Jewish population numbers in 1933 and 1948
For over a century, the Jewish World Almanac has been widely regarded as the most authentic source for the worldâ€™s Jewish population numbers. Academics all over the world, including the editors of the Encyclopedia Britannica, used to rely on the accuracy of those numbers. Here is what the World Alamanacs of 1933 and 1948 had to say about the world population of Jews.
THE TYPHUS EPIDEMIC
During the First World War (1914-1918), and even more in the years immediately following, some 25-30 million people in Poland, Ukraine, Russia and the Baltic suffered from typhus, or about 20-23 percent of the total population, of whom several million perished. When war broke out in Europe in 1939, German medical and military leaders were mindful of the terrible impact of typhus during the earlier conflict, and acted accordingly. At the outset of the Second World War, the most advanced method used to kill typhus-carrying lice was â€œZyklon B.â€ This was the trade name of a pest control agent manufactured from the 1920s to the 1950s by the Degesch company of Frankfurt am Main. â€œZyklonâ€ is hydrocyanic or â€œPrussicâ€ acid (HCN) absorbed in a porous material such as gypsum or diatomaceous earth, which is kept in tightly sealed cans until it is deployed by trained personnel. HCNâ€™s boiling point is 26 degrees C (79 F). It is commonly believed that SS men used Zyklon to kill millions of Jews in gas chambers at Auschwitz and other German camps. But in fact SS men used Zyklon to help prevent camp inmatesâ€™ deaths. They deployed it in very large quantities at Auschwitz and other wartime concentration camps by fumigating barracks, by delousing clothing in special gas chambers, and so forth, to destroy disease-bearing vermin. In the rapid expansion of the camps in Poland, in 1941-1942, the Germans were able to anticipate this danger on account of the World War I experience. However their countermeasures largely failed and typhus epidemics broke out in summer 1942.
Typhus was a real problem in the concentration camps, spread by lice in the constant traffic with the east. There were two serious typhus epidemics at Auschwitz: one in the summer of 1942 and another in the summer of 1943. In the typhus epidemic in the summer of 1942 in the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp from 1 to 19 August, 4,113 deaths were registered, on average 216 per day. The figure for the number of recorded male ordinary deaths at Auschwitz, in the period 1 July â€“ 19 August, has survived; it was 8,236. This was the main cause of the deaths in Belsen (also Typhoid from contaminated water, and diarrhoea). When an epidemic of typhus broke out in Dachau at the end of 1942, the camp doctor placed the camp under quarantine for two months. In Majdanek concentration camp on February 1942, a typhus epidemic killed more than 1,000 people.
When typhus broke out in the Auschwitz camp for the first time in the summer of 1942, the German authorities there responded resolutely. In an effort to halt the disease, Commandant Rudolf HÃ¶ss ordered a full-scale quarantine (vollstÃ¤ndige Lagersperre) of the camp in July 1942. SS men and their families were not allowed to leave the camp area. As the epidemic continued to spread, HÃ¶ss ordered further measures, including delousing actions with Zyklon, a prohibition against SS men and their families eating uncooked fruits and vegetables, disinfections of living quarters, obligatory vaccinations, and further restrictions on movement. Special â€œlouse inspectionâ€ units were organized, and those who failed to observe the anti-lice measures were punished. As a result of the summer 1942 epidemic, the crematorium construction project at Auschwitz was greatly expanded. The ReichsfÃ¼hrer-SS, Heinrich Himmler, visited Auschwitz on 17-18 July 1942; the epidemics must have been the major item on the agenda. The camp was quarantined on 23 July, probably by order, or with the consent, of Himmler. Typhus epidemics being hard to combat, the unacceptable high death rates continued. On 28 December 1942 Himmler ordered that the death rate â€œbe reduced at all costsâ€, and a renewed campaign to do so ensued. After several months the concentration camp administration presented Himmler with data to show progress; that data later became Nuremberg trial document 1469-PS.
In 1944, during the final year of the war in Europe, the Germans installed and operated state-of-the-art high frequency facilities at Auschwitz to kill disease-bearing lice and other pests. These expensive installations, installed in response to the high death rate wrought by disease, worked on the same principle as the familiar microwave appliances widely used today in households around the world. These Auschwitz facilities, designed to help save lives, proved very effective. Deployment of â€œmicrowaveâ€ delousing facilities was just one of many conscientious measures taken by the SS authorities to save inmatesâ€™ lives.
It is highly significant that among this enormous collection of secret German records, not a single one provides any evidence of mass killing, or even refers to a German wartime policy or program of â€œextermination.â€ To the contrary, many of these documents â€” such as those cited in this article â€” further demonstrate the seriousness of the efforts by high-level government and SS authorities to maintain the health of inmates by combating disease in the camps.
Jewish scholar Arno Mayer, a professor of history at Princeton University, acknowledges in his 1988 book about the â€œfinal solutionâ€ that more Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result of typhus and other â€œnaturalâ€ causes than were executed.
All photographs of heaps of corpses who had died from typhus and/or malnourishment were taken in Western camps around the end of the war, such as Dachau, Bergen-Belsen, and Buchenwald, where historians now agree no mass murders took place. Significantly, there are no such photographs taken at the camps in which mass murder is alleged to have occurred (Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec, Sobibor, Chelmno, Majdanek.) These eastern camps were all in areas which came under Soviet control at warâ€™s end. It is very telling that the Soviets released no pictures of mass graves or heaps of corpses and allowed no journalists, medical professionals, or other experts to examine the camps.
Typhus and the Jews
High Frequency Delousing Facilities at Auschwitz
Auschwitz, and the Typhus Plague in Poland
Deaths at Auschwitz, 1942
Deaths in German Concentration Camps
AMOUNTS OF ZYKLON-B USED AT THE CAMPS
Zyklon-B was the trade name for of a cyanide-based pesticideÂ invented in the early 1920s. It was used in Germany, before and during the Second World War, for disinfection and pest extermination in ships, buildings and machinery.Â Zyklon-B consisted of diatomite, in the form of granules the size of fine peas, saturated with prussic acid. In view of its volatility and the associated risk of accidental poisoning, it was supplied in sealed metal canisters. One of the co-inventors of Zyklon-B, the chemist and businessman Bruno Tesch, was executed by the British in 1946 for his role in the alleged Holocaust. In the concentration camps it was used for sanitation and pest control. There were disinfectant chambers, in all the camps, where inmates clothes were disinfected to combat typhus and other diseases. When you break down the amount of Zyklon-B used in all the camps, those not alleged to have gas chambers and those alleged to have gas chambers, the amount per inmate is very similar.
HIMMLER â€“ â€œREDUCE DEATHS AT ALL COSTSâ€
Heinrich Himmler, chief of the Concentration Camps issued orders on December 28, 1942, that â€œThe death rate in the concentration camps must be reduced at all costsâ€ (Reitlinger, â€œThe Final Solutionâ€). The camps had been hit with a deadly typhus epidemic that spread by fleas and body lice. Stomach pain, high fever, emaciation and death can quickly follow. All of the camps were factories and the loss of workers was hurting war production. Inspector of the camps, Richard Glucks responded to Himmlerâ€™s order on January 20, 1943, â€œEvery means will be used to lower the death ratesâ€ (Nuremberg Tribunal Document No. 1523).
On April 10, 1943, Oswald Pohl, head of the Economic Administration Office of the camps issued a letter stating that persons with tuberculosis were being sent to the camps resulting in the â€œshockingly high mortality figuresâ€ (Nuremberg Documents). Later, on September 30, 1943, Pohl was able to show that the camp death rate had been reduced from 8.5% in July, 1942 to 2.8% in June 1943.
In May 1940 Himmler wrote: â€œwe reject the Bolshevist method of physical destruction of a people as un-Germanic and impossibleâ€¦â€ (May 1940 Memo: when Himmler considered the physical destruction of a people â€œBolchevist, un-Germanic & impossibleâ€
The German SS arrested Buchenwald Commandant, Karl Koch in 1943 for mistreating and even executing some prisoners. After an investigation Koch was found guilty by SS Judge Konrad Morgen and shot. Does this sound like a policy of â€œextermination?â€
After the War, with suspicion rapidly rising about the holocaust claim, a committee of Jewish leaders from New York and Paris met with communist leaders in Warsaw. There they established the â€œCommittee for the Investigation of War Crimes and War Criminalsâ€. It was after this meeting that the announcement was made that all gas chambers were located in Poland.
Documented â€“ Germans Punished Germans for Mistreatment of Jews in WWII
Punishment of Germans, by Third Reich authorities, for mistreatment of Jews (1939-1945)
Thrown out of the SS for beating up Jews
RED CROSS INSPECTION VISITS
The International Red Cross, including a number of officials from the U.S., Britain, France, and Switzerland, inspected the German concentration camps throughout the war. The Red Cross had unrestricted access each month to every German concentration camp including Auschwitz. They had inside men who reported to them in detail the activities at the camps. Auschwitz was repeatedly visited by Red Cross inspection teams who were allowed to speak to prisoner representatives alone, in order to hear first-hand of any mistreatment, chicanery, interruption of mail and parcel delivery, health concerns, food and ration matters etc. They interviewed thousands of prisoners and delivered thousands of packages to them. They were asked to investigate rumours of mass killings and gassings. After their investigation they reported back to the American government that they found no a trace of evidence of any mass killings, but they did say in their reports that they had found terrible loss of life from epidemics and lack of supplies caused by the war.
An inspection visit to the Auschwitz concentration camp was made by Rossel and other delegates of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) on September 29, 1944. In their report on this visit, the ICRC delegation stated that they found no confirmation of the rumors of human gassings, and that the prisoners questioned did not mention them? (See Documents relating to the work of the International Committee of the Red Cross for the benefit of civilian detainees in German Concentration Camps between 1939 and 1945 [Geneva: ICRC, 1975], pp. 76â€“77. French-language ed., Geneva, June 1946, p. 92.)
In a Nov. 22, 1944 letter to U.S. State Department officials, the Red Cross said: â€œWe had not been able to discover any trace of installations for exterminating civilian prisoners. This corroborates a report which we had already received from other sources â€¦â€
The Germans captured 150,000 British soldiers. 150 of those men were engineers who worked at Auschwitz-Birkenau to maintain the manufacturing plants that processed Silesian coal to make gasoline for the German Army. The Germans were using a coal gasification formula developed in 1915 in Russia. These 150 men obviously had daily access throughout the camps but to date neither a Nuremberg prosecutor nor a Holohoax researcher has cited their testimony.
THE BRITISH SECRET SERVICE MONITORED ALL CONCENTRATION CAMP DEATHS
Using some of the worldâ€™s first computers the British Secret Service had cracked the German top-secret Enigma code and had access to most German Military communications by 1942. Sir Frank H. Hinsley, in his book British Intelligence In The Second World War ; Itâ€™s Influence On Strategy And Operations, stated â€œThe returns of Auschwitz mentioned illness as the main cause of death but included references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts to gassings.â€ The numbers of dead in the decoded messages tallied exactly with Red Cross and German Military records of the time. The British Secret Service also monitored various atrocities carried out by the Germans across the rest of Europe â€“ why would the Germans report these to Berlin but not the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz and other camps?
60,000 PRISONERS CHOSE TO GO WEST WITH THE RETREATING GERMAN SS IN JANUARY OF 1945
When the Russians were about to overrun Auschwitz in January 1945 around 60,000 prisoners which included many tens of thousands of Jews chose to leave Auschwitz and go west with the retreating German SS in January of 1945 â€” with the very same people who had supposedly been murdering them by the thousands every day for years. How is that possible if Auschwitz had been any kind of â€œextermination camp?â€Â In effect, they rejected their chance to be â€œliberatedâ€ by Americaâ€™s great ally, the Soviet Union, and probably join the war effort against Nazi Germany. The 1,000 or so Jews on Schindlerâ€™s famous list went west from Plaszowâ€“NOT East but Westâ€“some to Auschwitz just thirty miles down the road, and then on to German-occupied-Czechoslovakia where they made German munitions. Supposedly, they merely pretended to make German munitions according to the mythâ€“but that seems so implausible. Countless thousands of other Jews from Auschwitz also CHOSE to work in Germany for the German war effort. According to Elie Wieselâ€™s own words in â€œNightâ€ just before Auschwitz was to be â€œliberatedâ€ by the Soviets, both Elie and his father trekked west with the Nazis in a terrible winter on foot by their own choice. They had both chosen, in effect, to c-o-l-l-a-b-o-r-a-t-e with the Nazis and work (no free ride waiting in a Gasthaus) to defend the Reich. Some of Wieselâ€™s exact words in Night, paperback edition (Bantam Books, 1960) page 78 are: â€œThe choice was in our hands. For once we could decide our fate for ourselves. We could both stay in the hospital, where I could, thanks to my doctor, get him [the father] entered as a patient or nurse. Or else we could follow the others. â€˜Well, what shall we do, father?â€™ He was silent. â€˜Letâ€™s be evacuated with the others,â€™ I told him.â€
When Auschwitz was supposedly â€œliberatedâ€ by Soviet troops on January 18, 1945, the Soviets found approximately 5,000 people there. All of these â€œsurvivorsâ€ were persuaded to pose for Soviet cameramen and show tattoos on their arms, and how they had been crowded into barracks, etc. The impression given by the propaganda was that all the rest had been exterminated by various diabolical means. The reality was, however, that the rest were on their way west with the Nazisâ€“and had â€œfreelyâ€ chosen to do so rather than wait for the advancing Soviets. Among those who were not present at the original â€œliberationâ€ in 1945 was the great poster boy of the Holocaust himselfâ€“the one and only Elie Wiesel, and his father. They were both running with the Nazis through snow and cold at that very momentâ€“in order to stay far away from their presumed â€œliberators.â€ If Auschwitz really was anywhere as terrible as so many people claim, then why did at least twenty thousand prisoners, many but not all Jews, from the camp â€œchoose freelyâ€ to go west with the retreating Nazis in January 1945 rather than be â€œliberatedâ€ by the westward advancing Soviets? They could have been â€œliberatedâ€ within a few days at most, but THEY CHOSE to collaborate with the Nazis instead. Obviously, they all knew quite well that the Nazis were not all that badâ€“but, after the war some invented fantastic horror stories to cover their collaboration and even made successful careers from their lies.
Was Auschwitz Liberated or Merely Occupied by the Red Army?
Go West Young Man by Friedrich Paul Berg
There were approximately 3 million Jews in German- occupied Europe. More than half of those Jews who migrated to the Soviet Union after 1939 came from Poland.
According to Louis Levine, President of the American Jewish Council for Russian Relief, who made a post-war tour of the Soviet Union and submitted a report on the status of Jews there, the majority of these numbers were evacuated east after the German armies launched their invasion. In Chicago, on October 30th, 1946, he declared that: â€œAt the outset of the war, Jews were amongst the first evacuated from the western regions threatened by the Hitlerite invaders, and shipped to safety east of the Urals. Two million Jews were thus saved.â€ This high number is confirmed by the Jewish journalist David Bergelson, who wrote in the Moscow Yiddish paper Ainikeit, December 5th, 1942, that â€œThanks to the evacuation, the majority (80%) of the Jews in the Ukraine, White Russia, Lithuania and Latvia before the arrival of the Germans were rescued.â€ Reitlinger agrees with the Jewish authority Joseph Schechtmann, who admits that huge numbers were evacuated, though he estimates a slightly higher number of Russian and Baltic Jews left under German occupation, between 650,000 and 850,000 (Reitlinger, The Final Solution, p. 499). In respect of these Soviet Jews remaining in German territory, it will be proved later that in the war in Russia no more than one hundred thousand persons were killed by the German Action Groups as partisans and Bolshevik commissars, not all of whom were Jews.
Certainly thousands of relatives got separated on either side of the Iron Curtain each believing the other had perished but were in fact still alive. The case of the reunion between two brothers after one recognised the other on the Montel Williams Show with David Cole demonstrates that there must have been thousands of more such cases.
2,200,000 Jews escaped the Nazis into Russia
1/3rd of Holocaust victims not murdered
Former inmates have confirmed that they saw no evidence of extermination at Auschwitz.
An Austrian woman, Maria Vanherwaarden, testified about her camp experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She was interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations with a Polish forced laborer. On the train journey to the camp, a Gypsy woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at Auschwitz. Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The terrified women were sure that they were about to die. But then, instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads.
Auschwitz was no vacation resort, Maria confirmed. She witnessed the deaths of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus. She saw some take their own lives. But she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings, or of any extermination program.
A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily. She likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of gas chambers during the time she was interned there. She heard the gassing stories only later.
THE FRENCH RESISTANCE
After World War Two French resistance members were released from various German concentration camps, including Auschwitz and other alleged death camps. On their return to France they all gave accounts of their treatment by the Germans. However they all denied any knowledge of gas chambers and a mass murder programme in the concentration camps.
WESTERN ALLIES NEVER LIBERATED ANY DEATH CAMPS WITH GAS CHAMBERS
None of the Western Allies ( Britain, Canada, USA, Australia, France etc. ) liberated any camps that had gas chambers, or other systems of mass murder in them. All the alleged death camps with gas chambers were liberated by the Russians. Consequently any alleged evidence of death camps and/or gas chambers was forthcoming solely from Soviet Russia.Â The Western Allies liberated a total of 12 main camps and the Soviet Russians 8 main camps.
THE LIBERATION OF BELSEN CONCENTRATION CAMP FILM
The whole World has probably seen the film of the liberation of Belsen concentration camp, it is horrific to say the least. Human skeletons are walking round with dead bodies covering the ground. This film was shown Worldwide at the time to show the evil of Nazi Germany.Â However Belsen was liberated by the Western Allies, and was never alleged to have had any gas chamber or be part of a systematic mass murder programme. The victims are in fact all dying from typhus which is confirmed by German Military, Red Cross and British Military medical records â€“ this is never pointed out whenever this film is shown. Ironically the deaths were mostly due to a lack of Zyklon-B, at the end of the war with Germany collapsing, leading to a mass typhus outbreak in the camp.
OFFICIAL SOVIET REPORT ON AUCHWITZ BY WAS WRITTEN BY PROVEN LIARS
Two of the Soviet investigators who compiled the fraudulent report pinning the blame for the 1940 NKVD massacre of 4,000+ Poles at Katyn on the Germans! Also signed the official Soviet report on Auschwitz.
The Soviet report which blamed the Germans for committing the Katyn Massacre was listed at Nuremberg as 054-USSR. Evidently this report is a complete pack of lies, fabricated by a pack of liars with an agenda. Two of the liars who signed this report were:
â€œMember of the Special State Commission, Academic N. N. Burdenkoâ€
â€œMember of the Special State Commission, Mythropolitos Nikolaiâ€
The official Soviet report on Auschwitz was listed at Nuremberg as 008-USSR. Two of the men who signed this report were:
â€œThe Academic N. N. Burdenkoâ€
â€œThe Mytropolitos Nikolausâ€
Some of the most authoritative books on the Holocaust quote from USSR-008, the Soviet report on Auschwitz which was signed by two proven liars.
The Jewish Nuremberg prosecutor and the Katyn fraud
THE NUREMBERG TRIALS 1945 TO 1949
The Nuremberg Trials were held in the German City of Nuremberg from 1945 to 1949. These Trials were held by the victorious Allies ( France, Britain , USA and Soviet Russia ) with the Germans as defendants. They were the worst sort of show trials with the main Judge being Nikitchenko, who had presided over Stalinâ€™s show trials of 1936 to 1938 in the Soviet Union. The Court came up with ridiculous findings like Jews being turned in to lampshades and even soap, these claims are now discredited and even the Jews admit they were untrue. The Chief Justice of the United States Harlan Fiske Stone called the Nuremberg trials a fraud. He said â€œChief US prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg,â€ he wrote. â€œI donâ€™t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a Court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas.â€
Associate Supreme Court Justice William O Douglas charged that the Allies were guilty of â€œsubstituting power for principleâ€ at Nuremberg. â€œI thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled,â€ he wrote. â€œLaw was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamor of the time.â€
According to British General Montgomery, the Germans had only one sin : They lost the war.
President John F Kennedy in his book,Â Profiles in Courage, criticised Nuremberg as a show trial.
Out of 139 German witnesses who testified that the Holocaust had occurred, the British Medical Officer recorded that 137 had â€œdamage to their testicles that is beyond repairâ€. A number of Germans had died under interrogation by the Allies. There was also the threat of sending Peoplesâ€™ families to Soviet Gulags.
Reports of widespread torture at the postwar American-run â€œwar crimesâ€ trials at Dachau leaked out, resulting in so many protests that a formal investigation was eventually carried out. A US Army Commission of inquiry consisting of Pennsylvania Judge Edward van Roden and Texas Supreme Court Judge Gordon Simpson officially confirmed the charges of gross abuse. German defendants, they found, were routinely tortured at Dachau with savage beatings, burning matches under fingernails, kicking of testicles, months of solitary confinement, and threats of family reprisals. Low ranking prisoners were assured that their â€œconfessionsâ€ would be used only against their former superiors in the dock. Later, though, these hapless men found their own â€œconfessionsâ€ used against them when they were tried in turn. High ranking defendants were cynically assured that by â€œvoluntarilyâ€ accepting all responsibility themselves they would thereby protect their former subordinates from prosecution.
Judge Edward L. van Roden, â€œAmerican Atrocities in Germany,â€ The Progressive, Feb. 1949, pp. 21-22. Reprinted in: The Congressional Record â€“ Appendix, Vol. 95, Sec. 12, (March 10, 1949), pp. A1365-66
PRIME PROSECUTION WITNESS DR. WILHELM HOETTL
The German policeman, Gestapo agent, Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl, was the prime Prosecution witness at the Alliesâ€™ Nuremberg Tribunal and as such is the source of the allegation that the Germans murdered Six Million Jews during the course of the Second World War. Hoettlâ€™s claim was accepted at the Alliesâ€™ Nuremberg trial on face value, and without any further attempt undertaken of an independent, objective, forensic examination of the charge, that the the Germans had committed a crime of such mass-murder.
At a later date, after the hysteria of the war-years had abated somewhat, the U.S. officials responsible for handling their witness-agent, Wilhelm Hoettl, had time to reflect on the character of their prime prosecution witness. Let us be clear here: had Hoettl not played the role allotted to him at Nuremberg, then without doubt he would have suffered the same fate as many of his erstwhile colleagues: the hangmanâ€™s noose.
Many years later, the reports of U.S. Intelligence agents relating to these events were made public. Herewith their confidential opinion of the said Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl:
â€œUpon his arrest in May 1945, Hoettl played to the interests of his captorsâ€¦â€
â€œDr. Wilhelm Hoettl is a fabricator of intelligence information. His reports normally consist of a fine cobweb of fact, heavily padded with lies, conjecture and other false information.â€
â€œa man of such low character and poor political record that his use for intelligence activities, regardless of how profitable they may be, is a short-sighted policy by the U.S.â€
The prime Prosecution witness and source of the Six Million allegation revealed, at last, as such a â€œlow character, dealing in lies, deceit conjecture and other false types of informationâ€, that his use by the U.S., regardless of â€œhow profitable it may be, is a short-sighted policy.â€
Of the Truth revealed, one can only say: Better late then never.
For the revelations of Hoettlâ€™s true character, see the Journal of Historical Review, of September-December 2001, Vol 20, no.5-6, pages 25-32.
GAS CHAMBER â€œEVIDENCEâ€
At the Nuremberg Trial the existence of gas chambers was not established by physical and technical evidence that is normally required in any criminal trial. Articles 19 and 21 of the Statute of the Court dispensed the charge of this constraint. The alleged gas chambers were neither studied or even described. Most of the crimes the Germans were accused of were â€˜documentedâ€™ by reports from mainly a â€˜Special State Commissionâ€™ Soviet which wrote the reports before 1946 in the USSR. These â€œdocumentsâ€ had value of â€˜evidenceâ€™ under Article 21 of the Statute of the Tribunal. The official historians who then wrote about the Nazi period took no rigorous research that was finally able to remedy the shortcomings of Nuremberg and finally prove beyond doubt the existence of these famous weapons of mass murder. This apparent lack of interest on this issue has extended until today. Thus, in the vast literature devoted to the Holocaust, there is nothing concrete in addition to the two items by Jean-Claude Pressac, which were quickly demolished by Robert Faurisson and by revisionist scientists Germar Rudolph and Carlo Mattogno. No comprehensive analysis or expertise on weapons of the most monstrous crime in the history of mankind was undertaken on the premises that housed these murderous rooms and the ruins of which still remain.
The four documents which â€œproveâ€ Nazis gassings
American Revisionist Samuel Crowell (a pseudonym) in his excellent 2011 book â€˜The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmesâ€™, writes how the Allies presented just four German documents at the Nuremberg Trials to prove the Nazis gassed people. And those were all mistranslated or completely out of context.
No real evidence for the gas chambers, experts admit
Many of the leading scholars of the Holocaust have stated on record, that the actual evidence to prove the Nazis operated homicidal gas chambers, is virtually non-existent. Following are a few of their admissions of this fact:
An orthodox historian finally acknowledges: There is no evidence for Nazi gas Chambers â€“ Robert Faurisson
THE TORTURE AND â€œCONFESSIONâ€ OF AUSCHWITZ COMMANDANT RUDOLF HÃ–SS
The confirmation that the former Commandant of Auschwitz concentration camp, Rudolf Hoess, was tortured and beaten almost to the point of death by his British Army captors, in order to extract from him the admission of multi-million mass-murder, which was then presented at the victorious Alliesâ€™ Nuremberg Tribunal as â€œproof of the Holocaustâ€ can be read in the book, â€œLegions of Deathâ€, written by Rupert Butler, and published by Hamlyn Books, London, U.K., 1983; pages 234 to 238.
In any proper court of law, confessions obtained under torture have no probative value.
In 1983, author Rupert Butler, notable for his other books namely Hand of Steel, The Black Angels and Gestapo (published by Hamlyn) wrote an anti Nazi book entitled Legions of Death. For this book, Rupert Butler researched materials available at prestigious institutions including the Imperial War Museum in London, the Institute for Contemporary History and Wiener Library.
At the beginning of Legions of Death, Rupert Butler expresses his gratitude to two persons, one of whom being British officer of Jewish origin by the name of Bernard Clarke. Bernard Clarke is notable for being the person who captured Rudolf HÃ¶ss. Numerous written or recorded statements by Bernard Clarke are quoted throughout Legions of Death. Because Legions of Death an anti Nazi book, Rupert Butler did not try to take a critical stance against Bernard Clarke who expressed pride in having tortured a Nazi. Little did the two know that by doing that, they would ultimately confirm what everybody knew all along, but nobody had first-hand account of â€“ that Rudolf HÃ¶ssâ€™ testimony was extracted by torture, that the job of the interrogators was to secure German guilt before the Nuremburg trials, that all those false and self-incriminating statements German POWs signed had been presented to them by their captors in finished form, only after they were broken down with the use of thorough psychological and physical torture.
Quote from the book (commandantâ€™s last name is spelled Hoess instead of HÃ¶ss):
The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjamas ripped from his body. He was dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually the Medical Officer urged the Captain: â€˜Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse.â€™ A blanket was thrown over Hoess and he was dragged to Clarkeâ€™s car, where the sergeant poured a substantial slug of whisky down his throat. Then Hoess tried to sleep. Clarke thrust his service stick under the manâ€™s eyelids and ordered in German: â€˜Keep your pig eyes open, you swine.â€™ The first time Hoess trotted out his oft-repeated justification: â€œI took my orders from Himmler. I am a soldier in the same way as you are a soldier and we had to obey orders.â€ The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The snow was swirling still, but the blanket was torn from Hoess and he was made to walk completely nude through the prison yard to his cell. It took three days to get a coherent statement out of him. But once he started talking, there was no holding him.
He was beaten so badly it took three days for him to regain coherent speech again? Interesting, because considering that he had been captured on March 11, 1946 (look up any source for confirmation of this date), his captors must have used the time while he was incapacitated to produce the 8 page statement in German and as soon as Rudolf HÃ¶ss recovered well enough to hold a pen, at 2:30 in the morning on either March 14 or 15 (the dates I told you to remember earlier), while he was still quivering from inhuman torture his captors had subjected him to, he signed whatever it was they handed him to sign. And by signing it, Rudolf HÃ¶ss ultimately sealed his fate. Anyone would have, though. They had just beaten him so bad, the doctor had to stop them or else he would have died. The same people were drooling for more, if only he had given them a reason to. This, however was just the beginning of his long way through torture to death by hanging.
As Bernard Clarke said in the quote above: â€¦once he started talking, there was no stopping him. That sounds very much as: Iâ€™ll sing. Iâ€™ll say whatever you want me to say. Do you want me to say I gassed 2.5 Million people? Iâ€™ll do that. After you crushed my balls yesterday, Iâ€™ll say I gassed 50 Million people if you like that number betterâ€¦
â€œCertainly, I signed a statement that I killed two and a half million Jews. But I could just as well have said that it was five million Jews. There are certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is true or not.â€ â€“ Rudolp Hoess, March 31 â€“ April 1, 1946
The post-war confessions of Rudolf HÃ¶ss, as well as others are known to be false statement obtained by torture. Several confessions, written out in English, were signed by German officers, thought they didnâ€™t speak or write or word of English.
How the British Obtained the Confessions of Rudolf HÃ¶ss
The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust
Rudolf Hoess was tortured into â€˜confessingâ€™ exterminations were going on at Auschwitz.Â He was then executed, a Judicial murder, so he couldnâ€™t change his story.Â The other Auschwitz commandants conveniently died, one from execution, Josef Kramer the other, Richard Baer, just before he was due to give evidence at the Frankfurt Auschwitz trial.
Rudolf Hoessâ€™s varying death toll estimates for Auschwitz
The British Catholic, Rudolph Hoess, and torturing children
James Bond, Rudolp Hoess, the Rothschild & the remarkable coincidence
THE GAS CHAMBERS OF WORLD WAR ONE
It was widely reported during World War One (1914 to 1918) that the Germans, and their allies, were using gas chambers to kill thousands of prisoners. However after the end of the War Stanley Baldwin admitted in Parliament that it had been propaganda, and no such gas chambers had existed. He also apologised publicly to the German People for this racist slur on them.
Gassing people in WW1
Don Heddesheimer in his brilliant book The First Holocaust (2005) reproduces an article printed in Britainâ€™s The Daily Telegraph on March 22, 1916. It states the Austrians & Bulgarians were killing people by shutting them up in churches and suffocating them with poison gas.
During World War One the British spread propaganda lies that the Germans were:
Bayoneting German babies
Cutting off childrenâ€™s hands
Crucifying Canadians soldiers
Making human soap in a â€œcorpse factoryâ€
On December 2, 1925, British Foreign Secretary Austen Chamberlain, didnâ€™t apologise for lie that Germans made human-soap in a â€œcorpse factory.â€ But he admitted it wasnâ€™t true, and hoped it wouldnâ€™t happen again.
WW1 German atrocities lies
An article from the Saskatoon Phoenix from 1915:
Cutting off a babyâ€™s head and playing football with it
Cutting off childrenâ€™s hands and feet or fingers
Making soup with a baby
Crucifying a young girl
Hitler reacts to news of his death camp
David Irving in Hitlerâ€™s War writes how Hitler reacted to seeing a newspaper headline similar to this one on October 27, 1944:
At the war conference later that day Press Chief Otto Dietrich showed Hitler an English newspaper which reported a claim by Moscow that 1,500,000 people had been liquidated in a concentration camp at Majdanek, which the Red Army had overrun, near Lublin; by way of evidence, there was a photograph of neat stacks of combs. A hush fell on the war conference. Hitler angrily laid the newspaper aside: â€˜Thatâ€™s the â€œhacked-off handsâ€ again â€“ pure enemy propaganda!â€™ (He told Sonnleitner after the conference that Allied propaganda had claimed in 1914 that German troops marching into Belgium had cut off babiesâ€™ hands and hung the children upside down in church bells as clappers.
Belgian Congo crimes inspired anti-German propaganda
Invented Propaganda Tales of German Atrocities During World War One
Herbert Morrison, a member of Britainâ€™s wartime coalition government during the Second World War wrote in 1920:
â€œAll the governments of all the warring nations deliberately deceived their citizens and their fighting men. They founded propaganda departments for this special purpose, paying men out of public funds to deceive their fellows by the spoken and written word. The government suppressed truth, newspapers, books and organisations, and imprisoned good men and true.â€
â€œNever again shall leaders ofÂ [the]Â LabourÂ [Party]Â or their rank and file be so ill-informed and so lacking in a sense ofÂ responsibilityÂ as to accept without critical analysis the statements of Governments (of whatever Party) who desire to lead this country into war.
Quoted in: â€œNever Again!â€,Â The New Leader, Saturday, November 29, 1941, pp. 4-5.
World War I Atrocity Propaganda and the Holocaust
WINSTON CHURCHILL AND EISENHOWER NEVER MENTIONED THE ALLEGED HOLOCAUST
Churchillâ€™s Second World War does not mention Nazi â€˜gas chambers,â€™ a â€˜genocideâ€™ of the Jews, or of â€˜six millionâ€™ Jewish victims of the war. Eisenhowerâ€™s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchillâ€™s Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulleâ€™s three-volume Memoirs is 2,054 pages.Â In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages there is no mention either of Nazi â€˜gas chambers,â€™ a â€˜genocideâ€™ of the Jews, or of â€˜six millionâ€™ Jewish victims of the war.â€
THE BALFOUR DECLARATION, WORLD WAR ONE AND 6 MILLION JEWS
During World War One the British Government had agreed with leading Jews that they would support a Jewish homeland in Palestine in exchange for the powerful Jewish lobby in America getting the USA to join the Allies. This led to the Balfour Declaration being made by the British Government promising the Jews a homeland in Palestine. After World War One the British Government were unable, or unwilling, to make good on this promise. From 1919 onwards the Jews claimed 6 million Jews in Europe were under threat from extermination unless they got a homeland in Palestine. This was 14 years before the Nazis came to power and 24 years before the alleged Holocaust started.
271 references to 6,000,000 Jews prior to the Nuremberg Trial announcement
Two hundred â€˜Six million Jewsâ€ allegations from 1900-1945.
140 Occurrences Of The Word Holocaust & The Number 6,000,000 Before The Nuremberg Trials Began
Lots of 6,000,000 Jews stories prior to WW1
The â€œSix Millionâ€ Myth
Erm â€¦ How do you know its six million?
Britainâ€™s to blame, for 6,000,000 Holocausted Jews
Cleveland Jew, Dr. Abba Hillel Silver addressed 70,000+ people at a Zionist rally in Madison Square Gardens, New York City on June 11, 1945.
Somehow, despite it being 5 months before the IMT at Nuremberg would even begin, Dr. Silver knew 6,000,000 Jews had been killed by the Nazis.
March 1943: OSS agent says 6,000,000 Jews will be obliterated
Wallace R. Deuel (supposedly a non-Jew 1) was a Chicago-born political scientist who worked at the American University in Beirut between 1916 â€“ 1929, and from 1934 â€“ 1941 was a correspondent in Berlin for the Chicago Daily News 2 (so was surely a fluent German speaker). He wrote anti-German books 3, many anti-German newspaper articles 4, anti-German radio plays 5, and even advised Walt Disney on anti-German propaganda cartoons 6. In 1942 he joined the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) as special assistant to OSSâ€™s director William J. Donovan. From 1954 â€“ 1968 Deuel held numerous senior positions in the CIA in which he oversaw propaganda, and he was also the CIA representative at the White House during the Kennedy administration. 7
The article below reports on a lecture Deuel gave in Maryland on March 22, 1943. It reads:
â€œThe Nazis set out in the beginning to destroy whole peoples. They expected to obliterate from the earth not less than 6,000,000 Jews as a beginning.â€
1933: Zionists knew German Jews would be exterminated
6,000,000 figure of Jews from 1936
6,000,000 Jews killed in 136AD
This 1897 â€œScience of Religionâ€ American magazine, claims nearly
six million Jews were killed in the Bar Kokhba revolt 132-136AD
THE KABALISTIC ORIGINS OF THE SIX MILLION FIGURE
Ben Weintraubâ€™s 1995 book, Holocaust Dogma Of Judaism, fully explores and explains the Kabalistic gematria and occultism involved in the number. 6,000,000 is the number of perfect souls times ten, and ten is number of the Sephiroth, the divine emanations of G_d as seen in the Kabala. Thus, it is numerologically predetermined.Â As a result, it can never, ever be changed. This is critical, central to the hex. 6,000,000 is the number. There are never more deaths; there are never less. 6,000,000 is the number. It must be ritually repeated and publicly acknowledged. 6,000,000 never refers to actual deaths. It is a purely symbolic, esoteric, mystical number, symbolizing the perfect result, a perfect creation, a magical Great Work in progress. Perhaps this is a part of tikkun olam, the Kabalistic-Talmudic â€œrepairingâ€ or â€œperfectingâ€ of the world, done of course by the self-chosen ones.
Benjamen Blech, confirmed this reality in his book â€œThe Secrets of Hebrew Wordsâ€:
Certain letters and the corresponding numerical value, are considered in Judaism to have greater mystical power than others because of the frequency with which they are found in â€˜Torahâ€™. One such value, the expression of which holds a predominant power in the Jewish psyche, is the Hebrew letter â€˜vavâ€™ which has a numerical value of six.Â The number â€˜tenâ€™ in the Jewish religion relates to Sefiroi (enumerations) by which, Jews believe, God manifests himself in the physical and metaphysical planes. â€˜Tenâ€™ is believed by the Jews to be the number of â€˜divine projectionâ€™. Therefore, the 600,000 souls of Israel, which are â€˜pieces of the Divineâ€™, when multiplied by â€˜divine perfectionâ€™ come to Six Million. sourceÂ â€œThe Hebrew word for â€˜ye shall returnâ€™(TaShuVU), seems to have been spelled incorrectly. Grammatically it requires another (vav). It ought to read (TaShUVU). Why is it lacking the letter (vav) which stands for six?. [TaShuVU] without the vav is a prediction to the Jewish people of ultimate return to their national homeland. TaShuVU in numbers adds up to 708: tav=400, shin=300, vei=2, vey=6. When we write the year, we ignore the millennia. In 1948 on the secular calendar, we witnessed the miracle of Jewish return to Israel. On the Hebrew calendar it was the year 5708. That was the year predicted by the incomplete word (TaShuVu), you shall return. We did return, lacking 6 â€“ an all important 6 million of our people who perished in the holocaust. Yet the fulfillment of the prediction of return in precisely that year implied by the gematria of TaShuVU gives us firm hope that the words of the prophets for Final Redemption will come true as well. â€œâ€“ The Secrets of Hebrew Wordsâ€, Benjamen Blech
â€œâ€¦ it is taught that numbers, like the Hebrew alphabet, are the hylic matter from which God constructs the universe. Therefore numeric relationships, especially those that appear in the language of Scripture, are not accidental or coincidental. Rather, such equivalencies reveal key interrelations in the structure of Godâ€™s universe and hidden creative potentials.â€ â€“ The Encyclopaedia of Jewish Myth, Magic and Mysticism
â€œThese numbers do matter,â€ Hilberg said. â€œThey also matter for the very simple reason â€“ call it religious if you like.â€ â€“ Raul Hilberg
SAMUEL UNTERMYERâ€™S â€œSACRED WARâ€ SPEECH
Samuel in August 1933 talks of a planned annihilation and extermination of Jews underway in 1933 and of the war that must be waged against Germany to stop it.
Samuel Untermyer, speaking on behalf of Jewry worldwide, declared war on Germany with an economic boycott.
Shortly after that, Untermyer gave an hysterical radio broadcast denouncing the Germans as â€œingratesâ€ and â€œcruel and savage beasts,â€ and calling for Christians to unite with the Jews to destroy Germany in a â€œsacred war.â€ Untermyer claimed that the Germans were â€œannihilatingâ€ the Jews by:
â€œlocking them in vile concentration camps, starving and torturing them, murdering and beating them without cause and resorting to every other conceivable form of torture, inhuman beyond conception, until suicide has become their only means of escape, and all solely because they are or their remote ancestors were Jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating them.â€
Even the official historical narrative of today only says that the so-called â€œexterminationâ€ of Jews, and the widespread utilization of concentration camps in Germany did not begin until 1939, yet this was only 1933 and Untermyer was already making clear and direct references to what we now know as the â€œHolocaust.â€
How is that possible? That fact alone (along with no real evidence to the contrary) is proof that the Holocaust story is just the result of Jewish propaganda, rather than an actual happening. Furthermore, Zionist Jews had been pushing the â€œsix millionâ€ figure going back many decades, as early as 1897.
â€œTHE FINAL SOLUTION OF THE JEWISH QUESTIONâ€
â€œMeanwhile, the war against the Soviet Union has allowed us to dispose of new territories for the final solution. Consequently, the FÃ¼hrer has decided to displace the Jews not towards Madagascar but towards the East. Thus, there is no longer any need to consider Madagascar for the final solution.â€
â€“Â Franz Rademacher, Feb. 10th 1942, Nuremberg Doc. NG-3933
Documents captured by the Allies after the war, prove that â€œThe Final Solution of the Jewish Questionâ€ (â€œEndlÃ¶sung der Judenfrageâ€) was also a phrase used by the National Socialists regarding the â€œauswanderungâ€ (emigration) and â€œevakuierungâ€ (evacuation) of Jews in occupied Europe. The term â€œEndlÃ¶sung der Judenfrageâ€ (Final Solution of the Jewish Question) along with the words â€œauswanderungâ€ (emigration) and â€œevakuierungâ€ (evacuation) appear in a July 1941 letter written by Reichsmarschall Hermann GÃ¶ring. The term â€œEndlÃ¶sung der Judenfrageâ€ (Final Solution of the Jewish Question) appears in a February 1942 letter written by SS-ObergruppenfÃ¼hrer Reinhard Heydrich.
But the Nazis werenâ€™t the first to use the term,Â that was the Zionists:Â In 1897 the National Jewish Association â€“ Cologne published its programme (called â€˜Thesesâ€™):Â (ii) Experience has shown that civic emancipation has fallen short of securing the social and cultural future of the Jewish people. The Final Solution of the Jewish Question lies therefore in the establishment of the Jewish State. Germany, Turkey, and Zionism 1897-1918 (1997) By Isaiah FriedmanÂ Â Â Theodor Herzl the â€˜Father of Zionismâ€™ used the term â€˜the final solution of the Jewish Questionâ€™ in an 1899 letter to the Russian Czar. â€œI supplemented this endeavor in my covering letter to the Czar: * Sire: It is to the graciousness of His Royal Highness the Grand Duke of Baden, who has Grand Duke of Baden, who has consented to become the exalted sponsor of my humble request for an audience with Your Imperial Majesty, that I owe my permission to submit the Zionist plan for the final solution of the Jewish Questionâ€ â€“ The complete diaries of Theodor Herzl: Volume 3 Zionist Nahum Sokolow wrote in his 1919 book History of ZionismÂ â€œThe progress of modern civilization has come to be regarded as a sort of modern Messiah for the final solution of the Jewish problem.â€ â€“ History of Zionism (1919)
â€œIt is customary to quote this (Goeringâ€™s) letter with deletion of the reference to â€œemigration and evacuation.â€ â€“ Professor Arthur Butz notes in his 1976 book Hoax of the Twentieth Century
1899: The â€œFather of Zionismâ€ proposed the â€˜Final Solution of the Jewish questionâ€
1898: Final Solution of the Jewish Question
â€œThe Zionist Plan For The Final Solution Of The Jewish Questionâ€
More Zionist plans for the Final Solutionâ„¢
The Zionist â€œFinal Solution of the Jewish Questionâ€
1916: Final Solution, Jewish policy
The Final Solution was common knowledge
Trotsky & the Final Solution of the Jewish Question
How Holocaust historians distort evidence to support the Big Lie
May 1943: No-ones told Goebbels about the Final Solution
Hitler said Jews will have to leave Europe after the war
Final Solution of the Canadian-Japanese problem
â€œGERMANY MUST PERISH!â€ â€“ THEODORE N. KAUFMAN
The only written plan for genocide during World War II was not a German plan to exterminate the Jews but rather a Jewish plan to exterminate the Germans. Before there was any mention of a so â€” called â€œHolocaust,â€ and while America was still neutral, American Zionists, with the approval of the media, produced the most mass genocidic book in history: Theodore N. Kaufman in Germany Must Perish (Argyle Press, Newark, 1941) literally urged the sterilization of 48,000,000 German men and women of childbearing age, so that, he explained, Germanism will be extirpated in two generations. Kaufmanâ€™s fervent proposal for the systematic sterilization of the entire German population was given respectful attention in the American press, including reviews in a number of newspapers. A review in the weekly Time magazine, March 24, 1941, called Kaufmanâ€™s plan a â€œsensational idea.â€
JEWS LIVED OPENLY IN BERLIN & 150,000 JEWS SERVED IN THE GERMAN MILITARY
Did you know that some Jews lived openly in Berlin during the war, with synagogue services? When the Soviets entered Berlin, they found over 800 who ha d been sheltered in a hospital that was open throughout the war. How could this be? Judaic folk also lived peacefully in other parts of wartime Europe. Gertrude Stein, et al, spent the war in German-allied Vichy France. And, we must not fail to mention the 150,000 (probably more) Jews and mischlinge (â€œmixedâ€; part-Jewish) who served in the German military. Others were made â€œHonorary Aryansâ€ and rewarded for their services to the Reich. For more about Jews living in National Socialist Germany during the war, see Hitlerâ€™s Jewish Soldiers by Bryan Mark Rigg, 2002. He and the Holocaust fundamentalists seem astounded, and annoyed, that few, if any, of these assimilated Jews and part-Jews seem to have known anything at all about the alleged atrocities. Of course, neither Rigg nor Lucy Dawidowicz, et al, ever considers that they did not recall anything because nothing like that actually happened!
THE ALLEGED BABI YAR MASSACRE DEBUNKED
1.3.2. The Alleged Babi Yar Massacre (Carlo Mattogno, JÃ¼rgen Graf, Thomas Kues)
Of all the mass shootings allegedly perpetrated by the Germans and their local helpers on the Eastern Front, the Babi Yar massacre is the most notorious. On 29 September 1941, 33,711 Jews are said to have been killed at the Babi Yar ravine near Kiev. Predictably, Jonathan Harrison uncritically accepts the official version of Babi Yar in his chapter about the â€œExtermination of Soviet Jews, June 1941-March 1942.â€ (p. 100)
Udo Walendy and Herbert Tiedemann have documented the wild implausibility of the official version of Babi Yar. As just one example, the various â€œwitnessesâ€ to this alleged crime flagrantly contradict each other on the most basic issue of identifying the killing instrument: the victims were shot with rifles, or submachine guns, or slaughtered with bayonets, or buried alive, or blown up by mines, or squashed with tanks, or killed by means of lethal injections, or drowned in the Dnieper, or exploded by hand grenades, or had their heads crushed with rocks, or were suffocated gas vans. 41 Needless to say, none of these embarrassing discrepancies are mentioned by Harrison.
Had the Germans really murdered more than 33,000 Jews on the outskirts of Kiev on 29-30 September 1941, the Soviet government would have learned of this atrocity within days and immediately denounced it in the strongest terms. As it happens, the first official mention of the â€œmassacreâ€ came at an impossibly late date. On 6 January 1942, Soviet foreign minister V. Molotov stated that â€œa large numberâ€ of Jews had been stripped naked, beaten (!) and shot in the Jewish cemetery of Kiev.
So much for â€œeyewitness testimony.â€ What about forensic remains? According to the official version of the Babi Yar story, the bodies of the victims were dug up and burned by the SS in September 1943, as the Red Army was approaching the Ukrainian capital, in order to destroy all evidence of the crime. If we are to believe the â€œwitnesses,â€ this mass cremation action wrapped up just before the end of the month. Yet on September 26, the German Luftwaffe flew a reconnaissance mission over Kiev, taking aerial photographs of numerous parts of the city, including the district in which Babi Yar was located. In 1992, revisionist researcher John Ball obtained a copy of the Babi Yar photograph from U.S. archives, and published it. His commentary encapsulates what any objective observer can see from the photograph itself:
â€œ1943 air photos of Babi Yar ravine and the adjacent Jewish cemetery in Kiev reveal that neither the soil nor the vegetation is disturbed, as would be expected if materials and fuel had been transported one week earlier to hundreds of workers who had dug up and burned tens of thousands of bodies in one month.â€
However, it remains to be noted that the killing of 33,711 Jews near Kiev is indeed mentioned in one of the Einsatzgruppen reports. So either the report is a forgery, or it is formally authentic but historically inaccurate. In either case, the report casts doubts on the authenticity, or veracity, of the Einsatzgruppen reports as a whole.
Does this mean that no Jews were shot near Kiev in late September 1941? Indeed it does not. As soon as German troops had occupied the Ukrainian capital on September 19, 1941, tremendous explosions rocked the city, and on 25 September a major fire caused widespread damage. Before long, mines had destroyed almost all public buildings, and hundreds of German soldiers and Ukrainian civilians had perished. To this kind of terrorist activity the German military typically responded as occupying armies throughout history have responded to similar provocation: with reprisals.
If shown hard evidence that two or three thousand Jews were indeed shot towards the end of September 1941, I would not be overly surprised. Since the Germans would not have wanted to alienate the local ethnic Ukrainians (many of whom had welcomed them as liberators from the â€œJewishâ€-Communist yoke), according to the grim logic of war the local Jews would have emerged as the natural target of such reprisals.
In any case, crucial questions remain unanswered. If a certain number of Jews were indeed killed, and if the killing itself was indeed carried out at one location in Babi Yar, why do the various â€œeyewitnessâ€ reports allege such wildly differing â€“ and absurd â€“ killing methods? On the other hand, if reprisals were carried out at another location (and in fact, Babi Yar is not mentioned at all in the respective Einsatzgruppen report), why did the Soviets not identify the place of execution correctly? After all, in the absence of external observers to check their assertions, they could have claimed as many victims as they wanted either way.
4.3. Babi Yar (Air Photo Evidence, John Ball)
It is said that after the city of Kyiv was occupied by German troops the Jews of this city were taken to Babi Yar, a ravine at the northwestern edge of the city, near the Jewish cemetery. According to eyewitness accounts, they were shot there, thrown into the ravine, and buried â€“ according to some witness statements, the ravine was also blasted and the bodies buried under the rubble.
In late summer of 1943, when the Front retreated again, the bodies were allegedly exhumed and cremated on gigantic funeral pyres or in pits. These activities allegedly ended on September 28, 1943, when the Kyiv area was already part of the main battle zone.
Illustration 3 shows the ravine of Babi Yar in an air photo taken by the Luftwaffe on September 26, 1943. The part of the ravine (near the Jewish cemetery) where the massacre allegedly took place is shown as enlargement in illustration 4. What we see is in fact a placid and peaceful valley. Neither the topography nor the vegetation has been disrupted by human intervention. There are no access roads for the transport of humans or fuel, no fuel depots, no excavations, no burning sites, and no smoke.
We may conclude with certainty that no part of the Babi Yar ravine was subjected to topographical changes of any magnitude during the war years right up to the Soviet reoccupation of the area. The vegetation in this valley was also not disturbed. Hence, there can have been no mass graves in these locations, and the mass cremations attested to can also not have taken place at this time.
This photo was taken in the middle of the 4 week period when thousands of corpses were allegedly being exhumed and cremated each day in the ravine bottom. There is no evidence of trails from trucks, horses, or people in the ravine, and no evidence of mass exhumations or cremations.
Babi Yar: Critical Questions and Comments
What Happened at Babi Yar? Fact vs. Myth
Babi Yar â€˜Massacreâ€™ Debunked
â€œLittle Evidence Supports Story of Nazi Atrocityâ€
William Lawrenceâ€™s famous doubting Thomas article about Babi Yar, which appeared in November 29, 1943 edition of The New York Times. Much worth noting is Lawrenceâ€™s assertion that: â€œNo witness to the shooting appeared before the (Kiev Atrocity) commission or talked with the (Anglo-American-Soviet) correspondence.â€ Because 24 years later at the West German trial of SS men who partook in the September 1941 massacre of 33,771 Jews at Babi Yar, it was reported that the majority of 175 witnesses who appeared in court to testify, were there to recount what they claimed to have witnessed at Babi Yar!
A REFUTATION OF FALSE CLAIMS BY DAVID IRVING AND DAVID COLE REGARDING MASS KILLINGS IN THE REINHARDT TRANSIT CAMPS
David Ivring is a brilliant historian of World War II but since being persecuted by the establishment for questioning the fictional Holocaust narrative it is evident that David Irving has been compromised into making false claims. Claims which are easily debunked.
David Irving has made the statement that 2.4 million Jews were exterminated in the Reinhardt transit camps without evidence and his claim is even 900,000 MORE than official Jewish â€œHolocaust historianâ€ Raul Hilberg claimed. There is no physical evidence to support the claim of mass murder in the Reinhardt transit camps. Irvingâ€™s claims were refuted by JÃ¼rgen Graf in his 2009 article David Irving and the â€œAktion Reinhardt Campsâ€.
David Irving and the â€œAktion Reinhardt Campsâ€
Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp? By Carlo Mattogno, JÃ¼rgen Graf
A review by JÃ¼rgen Graf: http://codoh.com/library/document/1652/
Carlo Mattogno, JÃ¼rgen Graf and Thomas Kues in â€˜The â€œExtermination Campsâ€ of â€œAktion Reinhardtâ€â€”An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious â€œEvidence,â€ Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the â€œHolocaust Controversiesâ€ Bloggersâ€™
Revisionist documentary producer Eric Hunt wrote a comprehensive response to the baseless and dishonest claims made by David Cole in his book â€œRepublican Party Animalâ€ regarding the Aktion Reinhardt camps. The below extract from Eric Huntâ€™s response totally demolishes the claim made by David Cole and David Irving.
Response to David Cole by Eric Hunt
A Revisionist sent me a link to David Coleâ€™sÂ written response defending his alleged belief that 900,000 Jews were â€œgassedâ€, buried, dug back up, cremated, and reburied and / or scattered at Treblinka 2. I was disparagedÂ along with my documentary and Iâ€™d like to respond.
I thank him for taking the time and keeping an open mind while watching the documentary and responding to it.Â I wasnâ€™tÂ directly disparagedÂ too roughly by Cole, so Iâ€™d like to keep it courteous between us, if he will allow it.
ToÂ supportÂ Coleâ€™s view on Treblinka and â€œAction Reinhard Death Campsâ€, heÂ reliesÂ on two general documents (theÂ KorherrÂ Report and theÂ HÃ¶fleÂ Telegram), two sinister but vague entries in the Goebbels Diary and statements by Himmler.Â Â However, ColeÂ deniesÂ the large amount of physical, photographic, and now,Â testimonialÂ evidence which supports theÂ idea that no mass gassing could have occurred at Treblinka 2 and it primarily served as a transit camp where Jewish wealth was seized before Jews were divided into appropriate groups andÂ sent on to other locations.
There would by necessity have to be huge remnants of mass graves at a site claimed to have murdered 10 times the capacity of the 90,000 seat Los Angeles Colliseum. Ground penetrating radar can detect such enormous ground disturbances as ColeÂ and Treblinka believers claim must exist, yet Caroline Sturdy Collsâ€™ GPR / LIDAR radar shows no such thing.
Caroline Collsâ€™ Ground Penetrating RadarÂ scan actually proves â€œdeniersâ€Â right. In the â€œextermination campâ€ quadrant of the camp (in the lower right below) there simply are no markings signifying massive mass graves which could possibly have held 900,000 bodies. Other than some smaller â€œpock marksâ€, in fact the ground looks remarkably mostly UNdisturbed.
This hard evidence proves ColeÂ hasÂ misinterpretedÂ documents and his â€œcode wordsâ€ mean nothing when we now have undeniable proof that there are no massive ground disturbances signifying massive mass graves for the 900,000 alleged gassed, buried, dug back up, and reburied at Treblinka 2.
To clarify, there are certainly mass graves at Treblinka, mostly for those who died on the way to Treblinka. But nowhere near 900,000 could possibly have been buried in this remarkably mostly undisturbed ground.
While Cole says this physical evidence (or lack of evidence pointing to massive mass graves) is worthless, this is in fact the most important evidence, not misinterpreted documents, with added code words or speculation. The evidence is still there!
The New York accented â€œChief Rabbi of Polandâ€ refuses the complete excavation and exhumation of Treblinka that would would definitivelyÂ destroy â€œThe Holocaustâ€ myth forever or destroy â€œHolocaust Denial.â€
The rabbiÂ didnâ€™t count on non-invasive LIDAR and GPR technology being able to see through theÂ ground,Â exposing the Treblinka hoax.
Review of David Coleâ€™s â€˜Republican Party Animalâ€™ by Chip Smith
No matter where the chips fall, I do think that Coleâ€™s â€œexterminationistâ€ interpretation of the Aktion Reinhardt system is superficially plausible and therefore useful. Whether it can withstand more intensive scrutiny is a different matter. Being a dilettante at best, I can only say itâ€™s not how I would bet. Presumably for reasons of brevity, Cole neglects to directly address the copious revisionist literature in this area, so when he states that â€œrevisionists have never produced an alternate explanation of the fate met by the Jews sent to camps like Treblinka and Sobibor, with empty trains returningâ€ I am left to wonder whether he has read Samuel Crowellâ€™s carefully documented treatment of the Aktion Reinhardt camps in the Nine-Banded Books edition of The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes. For what itâ€™s worth, the relevant discussion is framed in the seldom-read fourth part of Crowellâ€™s book, â€œThe Holocaust in Retrospect,â€ where â€“ Iâ€™m trying to save everyone time here â€“ the most succinct statement of an â€œalternate explanationâ€ (though Crowell would probably call it an â€œinterpretationâ€) is advanced in the fifth section, â€œAktion Reinhardt and the Legacy of Forced Labor,â€ beginning at page 339. Without wading too deep into the morass, Crowell offers a contextual reading of several key documents to support the revisionist position that â€œAktion Reinhardt was about wealth seizure and SS control of Polish Jews, chiefly for labor purposes: It was not about mass murder.â€
While Crowellâ€™s analysis does not â€“ indeed cannot â€“ exclude the possibility that these sites were at some point devoted to the crudely mechanized destruction of human beings, including by mass gassing, I think he is persuasive in his interpretation of documents that render the scenario less likely than Cole asserts. For example, the authentic Franke-Gricksch inspection report (which wasnâ€™t discovered until 2010 and is not mentioned by Cole) explicitly discusses the eastern program as a plunder operation, makes no reference to gassing, and includes population assessments that are plainly at odds with the numbers in the â€œfinalâ€ Korherr report (which, it should be noted, has been disavowed by Korherr himself).
Crowellâ€™s discussion of the top secret 1944 Globocnik report to Himmler along with its addendum also provides clear support for the interpretation that the AR system was primarily devoted to wealth seizure and includes an important note about â€œrelocated personsâ€ being given chits as a kind of bullshit assurance that â€œfuture compensationâ€ would be rendered for their assets â€œsome day in Brazil or in the Far East.â€ If the reference to â€œrelocated personsâ€ meant Jews â€“ and there is a strong contextual reason to assume so, given the geographic presumption in the wording â€“ then this addendum is difficult to reconcile with the notion that Jews were being systematically snuffed upon arrival at the camps.
HOLOCAUST PROPAGANDA LIES ABOUT DR. JOSEF MENGELE
No one personifies the â€œevils of the Nazisâ€ more than Dr. Josef Mengele. I have collected a number of materials about Mengele over the years including one of his published essays and his SS personnel records which show that he himself contracted typhus while at Auschwitz. He was a thoroughly decent and admirable man in every respect whose principal shortcoming was his choice of a name. I never came across even the vaguest shred of documentation that he ever conducted any atrocious procedures or experiments anywhere, ever. The case against him is all blah-blah from the likes of Ada Bimko and Eva Kor and Irene Zisblatt! It is incredible how Mengele has been vilified entirely on the basis of such blah-blah. Shame on the press and â€œscholarsâ€ for being so vile and stupid.
If anyone has ever seen a shred of documentation of any atrocious procedures or experiments by Mengele, please post it here.
â€“ Friedrich Paul Berg
Carlo Mattogno debunks the gruesome nonsense about Dr. Mengele (Dr. Mengeleâ€™s alleged â€œMedical Experimentsâ€ on Twins in the Birkenau Gypsy Camp)
Dr. Mengele denied performing ghastly experiments on anybody
Josef Mengele: A New Look By Michael Murphy
Mengele: The Complete Story A Review By Thomas Kues
Lessons of the Mengele Affair
Fake Mengele photo on H.E.A.R.T.â€™s website
AUSCHWITZ TATTOO HOAX
Of all the multifarious â€œsymbols of the Holocaustâ€ (and EVERYTHING about the Holocaust is symbolic), probably no symbol is more powerful than the â€œHolocaust tattoosâ€ of the â€œHolocaust survivorsâ€. Wherever you find Jews, you find â€œsurvivorsâ€; wherever you find â€œsurvivorsâ€, you find â€œHolocaust tattoosâ€. One â€œsurvivorâ€ at a public meeting of some sort has the same sort of effect on the audience as a shot of curare or displaying a crucifix in front of a vampire: the â€œtattoosâ€ (and the sob-stories with which they are inevitably accompanied), have a paralyzing effect on almost everyone who sees them; yet, astonishingly enough, apart from the tattoos themselves, there is not the slightest proof that the National Socialists tattooed anyone, ever, at Auschwitz or anywhere else. Let us examine this matter dispassionately, in a bit more detail.
SOAP AND LAMPSHADES
Soap and Lampshades: The Lies Persist
At the Nuremberg Trial, it was proven, that the Nazis made soap out of Jews. Its since been proven they didnâ€™t make soap out of Jews.
1941 article about fake WW1 soap lie
Brilliant article from September 1941, about the World War One propaganda lie, that Germans made people into soap.
â€œThere wasnâ€™t a word of truth in itâ€
â€œthe classic lie of war propagandaâ€
Radha Binod Pal (1886 â€“ 1967) was a judge at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, the Japanese version of the Nuremberg Witch Trials. He wrote a 700 page Dissenting Judgement of the trial which was banned in Britain and occupied-Japan. Pal made reference to the the World War I British propaganda lie that the Germans boiled down their dead to make pig food, which later morphed into them making soap. In 1925 the British Foreign Secretary admitted in Parliament, the story was untrue, in 1941 the Germans issued â€œpropagandaâ€ mickey-taking the British for it, even Americans were stating in 1941 â€œthere wasnâ€™t a word of truth in itâ€, but Jews still re-hashed it in World War II.
David Ben Gurion on the â€œsoap factoryâ€
Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion interviewed in the New York Times 1960 on the forthcoming Eichmann trial.
â€œI believe that through this trial all thinking people will come to realize that in our
day the gas chamber and the soap factory are what anti-Semitism may lead to.â€
MOST OUTRAGEOUS TALES OF THE HOLOCAUST
Please remember when you skim through this long list and read individual stories, that although most of this may appear completely outrageous, impossible and laughable, these stories and allegations were presented dead serious as nothing but the truth.
Anti-Zionist Jew Josef Ginsburg, whose father was a rabbi, testified as a defence witness in the second trial of Ernst ZÃ¼ndel in 1988. In his testimony Ginsburg stated that the false, sick statements made by â€œHolocaust survivorsâ€ would go down by 95.5% if they were made to swear a special Jewish oath, as the superficial oath made in a secular court of law was not morally binding for Jews.
Elie Wiesel Cons The World: A website dedicated to exposing the false testimony of the worldâ€™s most famous holocaust survivor.
Elie Wiesel on raping German girls
The origin of Elie Wieselâ€™s German hatred
THE ANNE FRANK DIARY FRAUD
In 1980, because of a lawsuit in a German court, the German state forensic bureau, the Bundes Kriminal Amt [BKA], forensically examined the original â€œdiaryâ€ manuscript. Their analysis determined that â€œsignificantâ€ portions of the work were written with a ballpoint pen. Since ballpoint pens were not available before 1951, portions of the work were added well after the war (Anne Frank died in March 1945).
The BKA also determined that none of the â€œdiaryâ€ handwriting matched known examples of Anneâ€™s handwriting. Earlier handwriting experts had determined that all of the writing in the â€œdiaryâ€ was by the same hand. Therefore, the entire â€œdiaryâ€ was a postwar fake.
The true author of the diary was Jewish novelist Meyer Levin, who demanded and was awarded $50,000 in payment for his work in a court action against Anneâ€™s father, Otto Frank.
The Diary of Anne Frank: Is it Genuine?
By Robert Faurisson
Anne Frankâ€™s Diary â€“
Some Honest Questions
â€˜Anna Frankâ€™s Novel: The Diary is a Fraudâ€™
Anne Frank FAQ
Sefton Delmer â€“ British Master of â€œBlack Propagandaâ€
SOVIET/ALLIED PHOTO FORGERIES OF â€œGERMAN ATROCITIESâ€
Photo manipulations in the USSR
Holocaust Propaganda Photographs
Letters to David Irving: Photo Forgeries
Dino A Brugioni: Photo Fakery: The History and Techniques of Photographic Deception and Manipulation
Dino A. Brugioni was one of the founders of the CIAâ€™s National Photographic Interpretation Center. He also co-authored the CIAâ€™s â€œRetrospective Analysis of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Extermination Complex.â€ In the â€œAbout the Authorâ€ section of this book it notes that he â€œbecame the CIA expert in photo fakery and photo manipulation.â€ Of course this topic is of interest to revisionists. It is doubly interesting in that the self-admitted CIA expert in photo fakery is also the one who wrote the CIAâ€™s report based on aerial photos to prove the Holocaust.
Auschwitz Cremation Pit Photo Fraud
Ghost Adventures is a US television programme about ghosts. In an episode entitled Prospect Place first broadcast in January 2010 aâ€haunted mansionâ€ built in 1856 in Trinway, which is just north of Dresden, Ohio is featured.
Hereâ€™s where it gets interestingâ€¦
In the episode they feature a photo, purportedly the aftermath of the train crash. But it just happened to be the photo, minus some corpses, of the sonderkommandos burning the corpses of Jews who had been gassed at Auschwitz-Birkenau.
There are only two possibilities:
A. The makers of Ghost Adventures doctored the Auschwitz photo for their show
B. The makers of the HoÂ£ocaust doctored the photo for their show
The pictures! The pictures!
No images are more emblematic of the Holocaust narrative than of the camp at Bergen-Belsen â€“ or more accurately, of its liberation by the British in April 1945.
Weâ€™ve all seen the pictures â€“ the naked, emaciated bodies being bull-dozed into open pits by cigarette-smoking British Tommies â€“ and these pictures themselves have become emblematic of the Holocaust.
Yet Belsen never was an extermination camp. Well, thereâ€™s nothing noteworthy about that â€“ nor was anywhere else. But what is noteworthy is that this fact is widely, even universally, accepted, even by mainstream Holocaust â€˜historiansâ€™.
But still Belsenâ€™s iconic Holocaust status persists. You can explain away till youâ€™re blue in the face and still their heads will wave slowly from side to side in horrified wonder â€“ the pictures! The pictures!
Bergen-Belsen Camp: The Suppressed Story
GENERAL REVISIONIST ARTICLES
The Great Holocaust Mystery: Reconsidering the Evidence by Thomas Dalton
The Holocaust is the greatest murder-mystery of the 20th century. Six million Jews, we are told, perished at the hands of the Nazisâ€”in gas chambers, ghettos, and concentration camps. They were starved, suffocated, and shot. Their bodies were buried in mass graves, or burned in the ovens of Auschwitz, or on open flames. And all simply because they were Jews. It was the embodiment of evil, the greatest crime ever perpetrated.
Traditional historians claim to know about this crime in great detail. They have documents, photographs, and hard evidence. They have incriminating testimony from key Nazis. Some of the gas chambers have survived. And they have innumerable Jewish eyewitnesses. According to some, it is the â€œmost well-documented event in history.â€1
And yet, when we ask detailed and pointed questions, our historians fall short. They donâ€™t really know when, where, or how the Jews died. They have no technical explanation of how it was possible, for example, to gas thousands of people per day in a single room, and then to dispose of their bodiesâ€”such that not a trace remains. They cannot find the mass graves that allegedly held thousands of bodies. They cannot explain wartime aerial photographs that show a disturbingly calm Auschwitz camp. And they refuse to even consider a raft of contradictory evidence. In fact, many aspects of the traditional story simply donâ€™t add up. The deeper we look, the more puzzling the picture becomesâ€”and hence, the great mystery.
As with any murder, we, as investigators, would like to examine several aspects of the crime; these would include the motive, the means by which it was conducted, and the bodies of the victims. We would furthermore like to consider all ancillary and related evidence that might support, or refute, the traditional story. As we will see, all these areas are problematic, from the conventional standpoint.
Comment by Jewish Revsionist Paul Eisen:
This is from the excellent revisionist websiteÂ Inconvenient History.
I donâ€™t often post straightforward revisionist pieces because I think this is best left to specialists and scholars. But this is different.Â This is the clearest and most comprehensive overview of the subject Iâ€™ve seen.
I hope itâ€™s read widely by all Holocaust worshippers, by all the Jewish apparatchiks and their lackeys who promote it and by all the state and institutional bodies who enforce it.
Why I Call Myself a Holocaust Denier by Paul Eisen (Paul Eisen is a Jewish Holocaust Denier)
My family were ordinary folk â€“ â€˜twice-a-year Jewsâ€™ we used to call them. But like most of us second and third generation, upwardly mobile, North London Jews, our Jewishness filled our lives. And, at that time, that meant Zionism and the Holocaust. For me, my family and our friends, a post-Holocaust Israel meant quite simply â€˜never againâ€™.
But, while seemingly ordinary, my family was also rather extraordinary. My father was unusually tolerant and free-thinking, and my mother too was unusually lively in her thinking. A born rebel, there was nothing she loved more than to burst a balloon. As for me, I started off, first as the family tsaddik â€“ awfully concerned with God and my Jewishness (though always strangely at odds with other Jews) â€“Â then the family dissident-intellectual. By young adulthood, you would have found me somewhere on the Zionist left â€“ unquestioning in my support for the Jewish state but wishing it would not behave quite so badly and stop embarrassing me in front of my friends. However, when it came to the Holocaust, my faith was unwaveringâ€¦.
But how could the Holocaust not be true? by Paul Eisen
How could the Holocaust not be true?Â How could such a delusion and deception have taken place?Â How could all those survivors be so wrong in their testimonies?Â How could all those perpetrators be so wrong in their confessions?Â How could all those documents, unspecific as they are, have been falsified?Â Arthur Butz called his groundbreaking revisionist study â€œThe Hoax of the Twentieth Centuryâ€, but a hoax of this size and nature just defies belief.Â Conspiracy theories rarely convince, nor do those who propagate them, so surely the sheer absurdity of the revisionistsâ€™ claim tells us all we need to know.Â So, if revisionism is to have any credibility at all, it must demonstrate how, if false, the Holocaust narrative, as we know it, came to be.
Was there Really a Holocaust? By Dr. E. R. Fields
Decalogue of Inconvenient Facts about the Holocaust (so-called)
66 Questions and Answers on the Holocaust
â€œThe Thirty-Nine Lashes Against the Hoaxacaustâ€ by Eli James
Holy Holohoax. My Government Wouldnâ€™t Lie To Me.
Holocaust Or Holohoax 05: Twenty-One Amazing Facts
World War II Negative Stereotype has to be Stopped
Holocaust Revisionist Websites
Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust
jan27.org â€“ Commemorating the Revisionists Who Introduced Sanity to the Auschwitz â€œDeath Campâ€ Narrative
Holocaust Handbooks â€“ Taboo-Breaking Books and Documentaries
Holocaust Hoax Museum | Deny the Gas Chamber Myth
One Third of the Holocaust
Winston Smith Ministry of Truth
Friedrich Paul Bergâ€™s â€œNaziGassings.comâ€
Dr. Fredrick TÃ¶ben
SIMPLE REASONS FOR REJECTING THE HOLOCAUST HOAX
People believe wrongly that the â€œHolocaustâ€ is based on an enormous body of â€œirrefutable evidence.â€ Those who deny it happened must be either insane, or nearly insaneâ€”and driven by only the foulest of motives. The exact opposite is the case. It is the holocaust claims which are, in fact, driven by a fanatical Jewish campaign of systematic and wholesale lyingâ€”and hardly any evidence at all. What little â€œevidenceâ€ there is turns out to be bogus or totally irrelevant. Holocaust revisionists are the true â€œwhistleblowersâ€ who deserve the greatest respect for what they continue to endure in their pursuit of Truth. America pretends to care about â€œhuman rightsâ€ but has no problem with the imprisonment of revisionists in Germany and elsewhere, even of revisionists who were in the US seeking political asylum for merely speaking against the most monstrous hoax ever.
What is not addressed in any depth here is the major reason for why people believe in the hoax. My guess is that people believe the hoax because they want to believe. It fills some deep emotional needâ€”perhaps to overcome a sense of inferiority compared to the Germans, or to somehow join the dominant group in society. The exact answer is beyond any understanding of this writerâ€”but it is an enormously important question nonetheless in the same way that one should try to understand why people believe in religion. Holocaust belief is a kind of new religionâ€”as irrational and ridiculous as any other religion but enormously appealing. For those who have not totally lost their minds, the following reasons for rejecting the hoax may have meaning.
1) There are NO autopsy reports of any Nazi gassing victims from any western doctors. Although there were many thousands of corpses available in German concentration camps by the end of the war and although at least 1,000 autopsies were performed, none showed any evidence of death by poison gas or poison. Dr. Charles P. Larson made those autopsies to find proof of gassings but found nothing. No other western doctors ever claimed to have found any forensic medical evidence of gassings either. So, what indicators of gassing were the doctors looking for? Larson gives no answer but the simple fact is that if there had been gassings with carbon monoxide or cyanide, the indications would have been extremely dramatic and readily visible. The corpses would have been bright cherry RED. The Soviets had supposedly performed autopsies (on red corpses from CO) to support their diesel gas van claims at the Kharkov and Krasnodar trials in 1943â€”but those trials were such obvious shams that almost no one takes them seriously today.
2) Except for two poor quality photographs allegedly taken near Krema 5 at Birkenau (see Pressac), there are NO photographs that are even alleged to be of corpses of Nazi gassing victims from any German concentration camps. Both photographs were obviously retouched and clumsily, especially one naked female in the foreground with flailing arms. They also fail totally to show any signs of hypostasis. Some darker areas should have been evident even in black-and-white photos.
The photographs that are endlessly shown from Belsen, Dachau and elsewhereâ€”and misused deliberatelyâ€”have nothing to do with gassings. The captions for those photos from any number of news or government sources clearly fail to even claim they are of gassing victims. For nearly everyone else, however, those photos are â€œundeniable proof that the holocaust really happened, even with poison gas.â€ The evidence from trials and confessions is largely unknown by comparison. The deaths shown were caused, in nearly all cases, o-n-l-y by natural causes brought on by the Allied terror bombing and strafing of civilians and civilian targets. One example of the catastrophic Allied bombing was the attack on the electric power station that powered the water supply to Bergen-Belsen shortly before the camp was taken over by the British at the request of the Germans. Without water for drinking or bathing, people suffer terribly and cannot possibly wash lice feces from their bodies either. The ongoing typhus epidemic with its episodes of fevers as high as 105 degrees Fahrenheit was made far worse because of the lack of water to rehydrate victims after their fever episodes. The inevitable dehydration caused, no doubt, many of the deaths. Similar horror pictures of emaciated corpses or sick people can be taken in any hospital anywhere in the USA todayâ€”even without the addition of terror bombing. Just remove the pajamas and bedsheets of those who have died. A pile of naked victims of cancer, or AIDS, or hepatitis or any number of other diseases looks no better than a pile from Bergen-Belsen.
Was FDR starved and tortured before he died on April 12, 1945? He died less than one month before the end of the war that he had done so much to bring about. Although his funeral casket was paraded through Washington with a great outpouring of public sorrow, his corpse was totally hidden from view. There are NO pictures of his remains. Why? No doubt his naked remains would NOT have looked any better than any of the corpses at Belsen. FDR could have been tossed into any of the open pits without drawing any attention at all. From the pictures we have of FDR at the Yalta Conference in February of 1945, he was little more than skin and bone already at that time, two months before his actual death. FDR died in America after receiving the best medical care and nutrition available anywhere. Poetic justice? Yes, of course!
3) There are NO German documents to identify any gassing victims. For those who think otherwise, let the USHMM, or the ADL, or anyone else provide such a document.
4) For â€œoverwhelmingâ€ holocaust evidence, what one is given aside from photos of people who died from natural causes is anecdotal rubbish. So-and-so was last seen being sent to the â€œleft,â€ or â€œright,â€ (it doesnâ€™t even matter) usually by Dr. Mengele (with a â€œconductorâ€™s batonâ€ and wearing a â€œmonocleâ€ according to Elie Wiesel: Night, page 29 in Bantam paperbackâ€”just like Erich von Stroheim) and never seen againâ€”but, sometime later (half-an-hour, or so) smoke was seen rising from the chimney of the crematoria just down the road and, therefore, darling so-and-so must have been gassed. That is as good as it gets, folks. An inconvenient fact for the Jewish liars who told such tales is that according to a CIA report,â€œ The Holocaust Revisited,â€ Feb 1979, page 11: â€œAlthough survivors recalled that smoke and flame emanated continually from the crematoria chimneys and was visible for miles, the photography we examined gave no positive proof of this.â€œ That is an understatement because the CIA had more than fifty high resolution photos from large format negatives taken by US reconnaissance aircraft when gassings were supposedly most frequent, every day during the summer of 1944 (4 April through 13 September 1944). The CIA experts could NOT find the slightest trace of smoke from any crematoria. Clearly, the â€œeyewitnessesâ€ LIED.
5) There are NO German documents that speak of gassing. For those who think otherwise, let the USHMM, or the ADL, or anyone else provide such a document.
6) Elie Wiesel and many tens of thousands of Jewish â€œsurvivorsâ€ c-h-o-s-e to leave Auschwitz and go west by January of 1945 with the very same people who had supposedly been murdering them by the thousands every day for years. How is that possible if Auschwitz had been any kind of â€œextermination camp?â€
According to Night, just before Auschwitz was to be â€œliberatedâ€ by the Soviets, both Elie and his father trekked west with the Nazis in a terrible winter on foot by their own choice. They had both chosen, in effect, to c-o-l-l-a-b-o-r-a-t-e with the Nazis and work (no free ride waiting in a Gasthaus) to defend the Reich. Some of Wieselâ€™s exact words in Night, paperback edition (Bantam Books, 1960) page 78 are:
â€œThe choice was in our hands. For once we could decide our fate for ourselves. We could both stay in the hospital, where I could, thanks to my doctor, get him [the father] entered as a patient or nurse. Or else we could follow the others. â€˜Well, what shall we do, father?â€™ He was silent. â€˜Letâ€™s be evacuated with the others,â€™ I told him.â€
7) Claims about how Nazi gas chambers functioned are wild, fantasmagorical speculation based on torture, intimidation and perjury, especially by Jewsâ€”and not on any German documents, or scientific evidence, or on any other gassings ever in the entire history of the world. As to the use of torture on German defendantsâ€”Rudolf Hoess, former commandant of Auschwitz, who appeared as a â€œwitnessâ€ at Nuremberg was definitely â€œtorturedâ€ and his Jewish torturer Bernard Clarke even admitted it later in the book LEGIONS OF DEATH by Rupert Butler, pages 236-38.
8.) The most thoroughly stupid gas chamber claims were those that insisted Diesel exhaust was the source of carbon monoxide to murder nearly two million Jews in the so-called Aktion Reinhardt Camps (Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor), and in â€œgas vansâ€ in Russia. This writer can take credit for the fact that those claims are finally being abandoned (very quietly, of course) by some leading â€œholocaust scholars,â€œ at least in Germany:â€”Achim Trunk and Peter Witte.
The final straw for the mass murder by diesel HOAX may have been an essay in the Journal of Forensic Science, September 2008 entitled â€œDiesel Fumes Do Kill.â€ On page 1206: â€œLastly, an extensive literature review produced no scientifically reported cases of fatal CO poisoning attributed to diesel fuel exhaust. â€¦in the medical examiner arena, lethal CO poisoning from inhalation of diesel fumes from any make or model of on-road vehicle is virtually unheard of and contemporary literature foes not report it.â€ Although the report concludes that the authors had discovered one case of such poisoning, their research was critically flawed by their failure to properly treat the blood chemically to counter the effects of decomposition which had occurred in the corpse. The fact that death from diesel exhaust is possible has never been denied by this author. The report shows, however, that diesel exhaust as a source of lethal concentrations of CO is absurd for exposures of less than several hours. A recent Filing before the US Court of Appeals explains the medical issues on pages 14-20 and 32. It seems the Kentucky court had prior to this ruled wrongly against the trucking firm and the truck manufacturer more out of a desire to protect Kentucky institutions than anything else.
The emerging alternate claim that gasoline exhaust was used instead of diesel exhaust is even more stupid. Deaths from gasoline engine exhaust would have definitely been from carbon monoxide because of the extremely high percentages of CO present before the advent of catalytic converters and environmental concerns. But for the so-called â€œholocaust,â€ the â€œeyewitnessesâ€ ALL failed to even mention any of the stunningly bright cherry red coloring that appears on nearly all corpses of people who died from carbon monoxide or from cyanide. Were the â€œeyewitnessesâ€ all color blind? Of course, not. They simply liedâ€”ALL of them!
There is one important exception, however, and that is a Dr. Theodore Friedrich Leidig of the Kriminal Technisches Insititut (KTI) who supposedly claimed to have seen an experimental gassing of Russian POWs in a gas van at Sachsenhausen resulting in red corpses. Such a story would have also been perfectly consistent with earlier Soviet claims made in 1943 during the Kharkov and Krasnodar show trials (with red corpses from CO) about homicidal gas vans but with diesel engines. By the end of the war, the Soviets had simply moved their homicidal gas van hoax to Germany itself. Leidig was smart enough to know, apparently, that any competent forensic doctor could not possibly be so stupid as to claim such corpses (from gasoline engine exhaust) were anything but red. No doubt, there were some accidental gassings from the widespread use of producer gas vehicles (18% to 35% CO) throughout the war and that is what probably was involved hereâ€”if there is any truth to Leidigâ€™s claims at all and nothing more sinister than that. A forensic pathologist like Leidig would have been expected to determine the cause of death precisely. After the war, such incidents were so useful for supporting the hoax and Soviet propaganda, especially in connection with Sachsenhausen which was under Soviet occupation in East Germany. Why would the Soviets change their story about how the Nazis committed mass murder? It had worked so well for them before. Just drive the same message with some â€œevidenceâ€ from Leidig. The Sachsenhausen gassing van claim was essentially the same Soviet claim as had been made by the Soviets in 1943.
9) The numbers of â€œholocaust survivorsâ€ are enormousâ€”even today. The numbers are well into the hundreds of thousands even sixty years after the war. In 2003 an Israeli demographer, Sergio Della Pergola, stated in an official Israeli report that there were 1.092,000 Jewish holocaust survivors alive in the world in 2003. Those huge numbers imply that there were many millions of Jewish â€œholocaust survivorsâ€ alive at the very end of the war. Moreover, many YouTube videos from â€œsurvivorsâ€ give personal details about how fiendish Nazis kept multitudes of Jews alive for many months, even years inspite of a supposed policy of extermination. Why would the Nazis have done that if they were trying to â€œexterminateâ€ the Jews? Did they want hundreds of thousands of Jewish â€œeyewitnessesâ€ to help hang them after the war? The alleged crematoria-gas chambers at Birkenau, for example, were in full, open view of nearly every inmate there. Why even bother with concentration camps if the goal is to exterminate people?
10) The â€œsix millionâ€ number itself is pure Jewish mythologyâ€”with a life entirely of its own. The number had been used repeatedly long before Hitler. Read the research from Eric Hunt and Don Heddesheimer. The magic number had been used repeatedly already in the nineteenth centuryâ€”as early as October 31, 1869â€”as a metaphor for perceived or future persecution of Jews by the Czar, or whomever.
11) Carbon Monoxide was used throughout German-occupied Europe as an inexpensive, alternative fuel (Holzgas or Generatorgasâ€“â€œProducer Gasâ€ in English) to drive more than 500,000 motor vehicles. It was made from woodchips and scrap wood, dead branches, twigs, etc. (available almost everywhere including the remotest backwoods of eastern Poland) by burning the wood with a restricted air supply in special gas generators, usually mounted at the backs of trucks and buses. The performance was terrible but at least the vehicles could functionâ€”and the cost of the fuel was minimal. The concentration of CO produced in this way varied from 18% to 35% and was extremely lethal. It was also flammable, even explosive. Its use required careful training and licensing and safety precautions by the drivers of all such vehicles. The gas would have also been ideal for mass murder since it was far more deadly than gasoline engine exhaust (only 7%â€“12% CO). Ironically, this technology has never been implicated in any of the holocaust gassing scenarios anywhere. Any danger of explosion in a likely homicidal gas chamber would have been easily eliminated by simply running water through the shower nozzles which the gas chambers also contained, supposedly.
Given the desperate shortages of fuel and raw materials throughout the war, especially in German-occupied Europe, the use of diesel or gasoline engines as a source of carbon monoxide should be seen as one of the dumbest ideas imaginable. No doubt, people do dumb things but surely after a few gassings with engine exhaust, someone would have tried to find something better. The diesel engines even had trouble starting, according to Kurt Gerstein, and that supposedly influenced Rudolf Hoess to use Zyklon-B instead in Auschwitz. Well, why use an engine in the first place when the fuel everyone was urged and eventually even required to use by law as an alternative to gasoline or diesel fuel was itself far more toxicâ€”and as cheap as dirt? Why, indeed? If the engine exhaust for mass murder claims persist, one should also condemn the Nazis for being the most technically ignorant mass murderers in all of human history. Can anyone who knows the facts about what was happening in technology during the war, really believe the Germans were that dumb? Are historians capable of recognizing the inherent technical absurdity of the gassing claims, especially for the so-called Aktion Reinhardt camps? Probably not!
12) Cyanide gas from Zyklon-B was used ONLY to keep people alive. It had been used worldwide, even in the US in New York City of all places, since the 1920â€™s to fumigate ships, railroad cars, buildings and everything that might be harboring dangerous pests such as rats and lice. Its lifesaving use in German concentration camps such as Auschwtz was and still is marked by the brilliant Prussian Blue staining of the brick walls near to where it was usedâ€”even on the exteriors of the exterior brick walls which have been subject to more than half a century of weathering. But, but, butâ€”where people were supposedly gassed to death by the thousands with the same substance every day, there is NO trace of blue staining at all.
Cyanide escapes from Zyklon-B granules s-l-o-w-l-y unless the gas is forced out, preferably with warm air. Zyklon-B was made to work that way. Since no such forcing of cyanide is even alleged, (the fans were supposedly turned ON o-n-l-y after the victims were all dead) the ONLY way that anything like the mass execution times of as few as three minutes could possibly have occurred (Vrba-Wetzler Report of 1944) would have been by using enormous amounts of Zyklon-B, at least ten times more than the amounts needed to simply kill the victims over several hours. Such huge quantities of Zyklon-B would have given at least as much opportunity for cyanide to penetrate the surrounding stucco-covered brick walls as at the delousing stations. For people familiar with Zyklon-B and how it was actually used, the solution to the dilemma would have been obvious. Simply insert a mesh basket with Zyklon-B granules almost anywhere into the warm air ductwork which the mortuaries all hadâ€“and turn ON the blowers to force warm air through the granules and through the mortuaries during the actual mass execution. That is how standard DEGESCH Zyklon-B fumigation chambers worked in Dachau and in hundreds of locations throughout German-occupied Europe. In this way, at least 90% of the Zyklon-B would have also been savedâ€”and the deadly cyanide gas would have been dispersed quickly to all parts of the gas chambers. Pockets of cyanide-free air where victims might crouch to escape the deadly gas would have been impossible. The hoax defenders are trapped by the fact that all of the self-described â€œeyewitnessesâ€ claimed the fans were turned ON only a-f-t-e-r everyone was dead. The â€œeyewitnessesâ€ obviously LIED and the Zyklon-B gassing stories are rubbish!
13) The use of crematoria in German concentration camps is portrayed as shameful, even criminal, when, in reality, it is no more deplorable than the use of crematoria anywhere in the USA today. From page 78 of the linked source, left: â€œThe average time for a cremation cycle of newer retorts is around 2 h or less, not counting the preheating of the chamber or the cooldown.â€ Cremation is, in fact, the recommended way to dispose of corpses generally to prevent the spread of many contagious diseases through ground water. If the purpose had been to merely dispose of evidence of mass murder, cremation makes no sense at all since one of the main purposes of cremation is to r-e-c-o-v-e-r at least a small portion of cremains to be returned to family members in urns. For disposal of bodies without any recognizable cremains, i-n-c-i-n-eâ€“r-a-t-i-o-n as applied to ordinary garbage is far more effective since any human cremains will be thoroughly mixed with other waste. The fuel required is also far less. In Auschwitz-Birkenau, for example, large incinerator ovens were located in the crematory buildings also but it has never even been alleged that those ovens were ever used to incinerate corpses. Cremation was also used on Ellis Island and delousing chambers were used on nearby Hoffman Island.
14) Large Zyklon-B gas chambers for fumigating entire railroad trains, several railroad cars at a time, were strategically located in eastern Europe. Some known locations are Posen and Budapest, More than likely, Auschwitz-Birkenau also had such a gas chamber for railroad cars but there is no known proof of this yet. In any event, all such gas chambers would have been ideal for mass extermination. Intended victims trapped inside cattle cars could have easily been pulled into such chambers. The railroad cars after gassing could have been removed with corpses and disposed of in any number of ways later on. But, although such a technology would have been obvious to anyone familiar with Zyklon-B and how it had historically been used worldwide to fumigate hundreds of thousands of railroad cars, even in the USAâ€”it has never been implicated anywhere in the holocaust mythology. How could the fiendish Nazis not have thought of applying this superb technology?
Read more at: http://nazigassings.com/