Russian female soldiers at the May 9 victory parade; Hitler’s one huge mistake was RUSSIA

Contact/Supporting VIRTUS

…..Hitler’s one colossal moral and military error

A Belarussian girl – if these Slavs are not Aryan, who is?

Russian elementary-school kids in Kaliningrad, the former Königsberg, East Prussia

Spokesman for the Russian Defense Ministry, Colonel Igor Konashenkov

Another spokesman for the Russian Defense Ministry, Igor Klimov

Under President Vladimir Putin, WWII, called “the Great Patriotic War,” has become a very popular event. Russian civilians march, carrying photos of their relatives who fought.

.

With a photo of his father, who was a sailor, then soldier

A comrade wrote:

Yes, I feel my time has come. And the Republican dwarves are all gone. McCain is gone, Palin, Romney, Christie, all the fake-conservative, pro-Israel, tax-cuts-for-billionaires RINOs, the Republicans In Name Only.

The only man who will stand up to Frank Davis Junior, the Black Knight, is I. And I have awaited the full crisis to make my move.

The book to electrify the masses and recast our whole struggle in its spiritual dimensions — that is now the key. Do our souls live on if we perish fighting for liberty and our dignity as a race?

People will have to know these things before they face the awesome material power of ZOG. And the answer is in my book.

An Australian comrade wrote, having read my favorable review of the Tom Cruise movie Valkyrie [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valkyrie_%28film%29]:

You raise, as always, some thoughtful points, brother Brendon. I think that my record of loyalty to this great man’s values is unmatched, and he was NOT an agent of the British or Jewish network. But that does NOT mean I agree with all his decisions and choices.

The issue is this:

Did Hitler offer to liberate the Eastern Slavs or did he plan to subjugate them?

.

Did he several times reject Russian general Andrei Vlasov’s plan to set up a huge Russian National Liberation Army — until late 1944, when it was far, far too late?

Unfortunately, comrade, this Wikipedia article on Vlasov is accurate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrey_Vlasov

If Hitler did not like Vlasov, why did he not then work with General Peter (Pyotr) Krasnov, a “White” general who actually became a member of the NSDAP in the early Munich years? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyotr_Krasnov)

“White” ( that is, anti-Red and anti-communist) generals Anton Denikin (left-center) and Pyotr (Peter) Krasnov (right-center)

Did he intend a free Russia that would be a partner of Germany postwar — or a slave colony where only certain individual blond Ukrainians and Russians would be taken as children to Germany and “germanized”?

Pregnant Russian married women expecting their next baby, a delightful picture.

Did Hitler ever renounce his Lebensraum policy of seizing giant swaths of Russia and Ukraine for the Reich as agricultural bastions? I am amazed at those who have never read Mein Kampf –– as I have twice, in German and in English, and cover to cover — and yet claim to me Hitler never said this when he did!

In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote (in the second-to-last chapter, XIV, “GERMANY’S POLICY IN EASTERN EUROPE”):

Without consideration of traditions and prejudices, Germany must find the courage to gather our people and their strength for an advance along the road that will lead this people from its present restricted living space to new land and soil, and hence also free it from the danger of vanishing from the earth or of serving others as a slave nation.

The National Socialist Movement must strive to eliminate the disproportion between our population and our area,viewing this latter as a source of food as well as a basis for power politics between our historical past and the hopelessness of our present impotence.^[27]

The acquisition of new soil for the settlement of the excess population possesses an infinite number of advantages, particularly if we turn from the present to the future … It must be said that such a territorial policy cannot be fulfilled in theCameroons, but today almost exclusively in Europe.^[63]

In an era when the earth is gradually being divided up among states, some of which embrace almost entire continents, we cannot speak of a world power in connection with a formation whose political mother country is limited to the absurd area of five hundred thousand square kilometers.^[65] … Without consideration of traditions and prejudices, Germany must find the courage to gather our people and their strength for an advance along the road that will lead this people from its present restricted living space to new land and soil, and hence also free it from the danger of vanishing from the earth or of serving others as a slave nation.^[66] … For it is not in colonial acquisitions that we must see the solution of this problem, but exclusively in the acquisition of a territory for settlement, which will enhance the area of the mother country, and hence not only keep the new settlers in the most intimate community with the land of their origin, but secure for the entire area those advantages which lie in its unified magnitude.^[67]

Germany will either become a World Power or will not continue to exist at all. But in order to become a World Power it needs that territorial magnitude which gives it the necessary importance to-day and assures the existence of its citizens.

Therefore we National Socialists have purposely drawn a line through the line of conduct followed by pre-War Germany in foreign policy. We put an end to the perpetual Germanic march towards the South and West of Europe and turn our eyes towards the lands of the East. We finally put a stop to the colonial and trade policy of pre-War times and pass over to the territorial policy of the future.

But when we speak of new territory in Europe to-day we must principally think of Russia and the border States subject to her.

Destiny itself seems to wish to point out the way for us here. In delivering Russia over to Bolshevism, Fate robbed the Russian people of that intellectual class which had once created the Russian State and were the guarantee of its existence. For the Russian State was not organized by the constructive political talent of the Slav element in Russia, but was much more a marvellous exemplification of the capacity for State-building possessed by the Germanic element in a race of inferior worth.

Thus were many powerful Empires created all over the earth. More often than once inferior races with Germanic organizers and rulers as their leaders became formidable States and continued to exist as long as the racial nucleus remained which had originally created each respective State. For centuries Russia owed the source of its livelihood as a State to the Germanic nucleus of its governing class.

But this nucleus is now almost wholly broken up and abolished. The Jew has taken its place. Just as it is impossible for the Russian to shake off the Jewish yoke by exerting his own powers, so, too, it is impossible for the Jew to keep this formidable State in existence for any long period of time. He himself is by no means an organizing element, but rather a ferment of decomposition.

This colossal Empire in the East is ripe for dissolution. And the end of the Jewish domination in Russia will also be the end of Russia as a State. We are chosen by Destiny to be the witnesses of a catastrophe which will afford the strongest confirmation of the nationalist theory of race.

But it is our task, and it is the mission of the National Socialist Movement, to develop in our people that political mentality which will enable them to realize that the aim which they must set to themselves for the fulfilment of their future must not be some wildly enthusiastic adventure in the footsteps of Alexander the Great but industrious labour with the German plough, for which the German sword will provide the soil.

I have great regrets about this policy.

.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjsG1N_sHVc

And that massive country next door to settle was Russia. Yes, Hitler did a preventive war to prevent Stalin’s own attack, as Russian scholars themselves have revealed in their discussions of the Soviet plan called “Operation Icebreaker” [http://www.amazon.com/Icebreaker-Who-Started-Second-World/dp/0241126223] Hitler did indeed hit Stalin in June 1941 — before Stalin could hit Hitler in July of that same year — but Mein Kampf came out in 1925, advocating that Germany take land from Russia 16 long years before “Icebreaker.”

A cartoon from 19239 when Stalin and Hitler signed their Non-Aggression Pact

A Russian tank commander in WWII –not blond enough? (from the movie “White Tiger”)

A Russian higher officer

an ad during Soviet times

Yes, Hitler and the Germans were right, some Slavs (Russians, Poles, Ukrainians, etc.) do lie, steal and get drunk. But as we see now, when the full effect of degenerate Jew TV, drugs, divorce, abuse and corruption are everywhere, Anglo-Saxon, Germanic and Keltic people do all these things as well, and this always happens when morality is destroyed by the Jews, when the family is broken up into feuding individuals, when the man is no longer the respected breadwinner and head of the family but instead becomes a ridiculed, irresponsible buffoon, and when total moral anarchy reigns!

And some, some Slavs have a bit of Mongol blood but western White people are mixed too with all kinds of genes! How many Americans have some Amerindian blood, which is also Mongolian?!

The fact is that the reason so many German officers turned against this great leader, who had been brilliant from 1933, when he came to power, until 1941, when he invaded Russia, was that he continued a policy of subjugating the Slavs even AFTER Stalingrad.

Hitler had been invincible until Russia, and had fully earned the indescribable gratitude of his German people. He had lifted them from defeat in WWI, political chaos and the Great Depression to wealth, power, honor, freedom and victory.

ADOLF HITLER: MY HEART WILL GO ON

Video down because Sonnenrad.tv is down for lack of donations

…..JUST A FUN VIDEO: GERMAN GIRLS after the staggering military victories of 1939-40

Video down because Sonnenrad.tv is down for lack of donations

But come WWII, his own German officers who had fought on the eastern front understood how much the Slavs whom they were fighting also hated communism and the Jews and could be their natural allies. But the most Hitler would do is let the Slavs work behind the lines — as farm or factory labor or as anti-partisan troops, not however as front-line infantry or tank forces directly fighting the Soviets. After a while, he let a relatively small Ukrainian SS arise. But he did not want to arm the Slavs because he intended that the Russians have no say in postwar affairs in their own country. If they did not fight for Germany, they could not have a seat at the table.

Vassili Grossman, Soviet Jewish writer and war reporter

What Hitler said to Leon Degrelle, a Belgian volunteer who wanted to hear pan-Europeanism, and what he did are two different things. Léon Degrelle asked him if he felt more German or more European. Hitler answered: “I am a Hellene.” This meant he identified with Ancient Greece and the highest expressions of European culture. But that did not include the Slavs.

Tragically, this entire page from our white brothers at VHO in Europe (affiliated with Germar Rudolf) is accurate, on the topic of

Quote:

“I have the highest regard for the Wehrmacht. Nevertheless the German army will not be able to defeat the Soviet Union unless they are able to mobilize the Russian people against Stalin.”

Mobilize the Russians against Stalin! At the end of 1944 it was already too late.”

I, and resolute national socialist such as Roy Armstrong, Manfred Roeder of Germany and others with decades of sacrifice, veterans of street battls and even prison, all acknowledge that Hitler was anti-Russian, anti-Slav and that he “blew” his one chance to defeat the Jews and Stalin by his overreaching goal of winning the war without arming the Russians — because he wanted their land.

The Russians are a white people. Hitler’s choice was morally wrong and strategically wrong.

One can, and I do, admire to the supreme level the genius, altruism and vision of Adolf Hitler in his social policies and pan-Aryan values.

But when he left the solid foundation of pan-Aryanism and retreated into narrow German nationalism, he lost the war.

I for one was disappointed in his Political Testament, because it spoke ONLY of ‘Germany this’ and ‘Germany that.’ What about the rest of us Whites, facing after 1945 a world that would be totally Jew-ruled?

I say all these things to you, comrade, with unspeakable sadness.

WE COULD HAVE WON THE WAR.

If a new Hitler arises for our race, he will learn from the mistakes of the past, and have the broadest possible pan-Aryan vision. And he will SEEK an alliance with the great white nation called Russia.

And so in answer to your question, Hitler was absolutely sincere, and never a tool of the Jews or Wall Street. But in the East he was very wrong. Nevertheless, who can match what he DID achieve against all odds? He was an incredible, brave, visionary Aryan genius. If there is any chance of “reincarnation,” then he will come back chastened.

As I wrote on Facebook:

It is sad to see this: “The Russian Lower House has approved a bill that provides up to five years in prison for denying the facts set out in the Nuremberg Trial, rehabilitation of Nazism and distributing false information about the actions of Russia and its allies during WWII.”http://rt.com/politics/154332-russia-nazi-rehabilitation-ban/

BUT as I have often written, this is the latest bitter fruit of Hitler’s slavophobia. Had heinvaded the USSR to liberate its peoples in 1941 from the Jews, Georgians and Bolsheviks….

Two Georgian Bolsheviks, Stalin and Beria (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavrentiy_Beria), in 1936. They both used Jews as their main human weapon of mass murder to annihilate every Russian with any intelligence or backbone.

.

…..he would have gotten the support of 100 million suffering Slavs. Twice Hitler rejected the proposal of General Vlasov to create a 5-million-man “Russian National Liberation Army” — even after the disaster at Stalingrad. http://johndenugent.com/…/russian-women…

No one is more pro-Hitler than am I, and I have proved this in literally HUNDREDS of blogs, essays, and speeches. But Hitler went into Russia to conquer it for Germany, exactly and precisely as he stated in “Mein Kampf” 17 years before, to take “Lebensraum” for GERMANS from it — and not to liberate Russia and make this gigantic nation Germany’s ally.

So, to this very day, even very, very pro-German Russians like Putin do not like Hitler or his movement. And thus this legislation is being passed. I say today that the new national socialism must be for all races, white and non-white, and all peoples around the world that are threatened by Jewry. And this is the only way we can win, and this is how we WILL win! The whole world now hates the Eternal Wall Street, bloodsucking JEW!

.

Injustice anywhere is injustice everywhere! No man is free if another is a slave!

Not just Hitler, but most Germans and even many Anglo-Saxons disliked Russians or saw them as brutal semi-barbarians, so Hitler was a creature of his times, his generation a nd the mindset of his era. Also, he feared the pan-Slavic movement, which was a real threat to Germany, and led the Russian tsar foolishly to end his alliance with Germany, which Bismarck had wisely created to the benefit of both countries, and the tsar allied his nation with France and Britain to seek war with Germany in WWI..

The pan-Slav goal was to push the Germans behind the Elbe River, and reverse 1,000 years of German history of eastern expansion, that is, restricting them to western Europe. British and French intelligence funded this movement heavily as a means to pit Russia against Germany and Austria-Hungary.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan-Slavism

• The goal of the last tsar was to push Germany back westward to the year 1000 and unite all the Slavs of Europe

  

  .

  So Hitler was not “crazy” as a German leader to fear pan-Slavism — it was a huge movement and fundamentally anti-German.

  .

  But in the struggle against Bolshevism he should have changed course, because “the enemy (Slavs) of my enemy (the Jews) is my friend.” As we know, the outcome of the war was not Germans in Moscow but Russians in Berlin.

  .

  Russian soldier raises Soviet flag over the Reichstag in Berlin in 1945

  

  German woman wanders about devastated after being raped by Soviet troops; two million German women suffered this horrific fate.
  

  .

  7 MINS � Edited  L
• 

  John D. Nugent And as the Americans showed after 1945, via NATO, a “liberating” superpower can bind the countries it has liberated to it, and not even with open brutality. Germany could have liberated Russia and yet 1) installed a pro-German elite atop the new Russia and 2) integrated the German and Russian economies and 3) cultures so that Russia would never turn anti-German again.

  .

  Russians admire Germans anyway for their hard work and brilliant organization, and not only that — there would have also been tremendous gratitude by Russians toward Germany for ending the genocidal nightmare of Bolshevism.

  .

  I translated for The Barnes Review magazine almost the entirety of this 55-page monograph by German historian Udo Walendy on Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s 700-page book of suffering, Two Hundred Years Together, volume two, which was on how the Jews treated the Russians under Bolshevism. Every Russian family suffered disappeared relatives; Solzhenitsyn says 60 million were murdered.

  Russia and the Jews (I translated 90% of the main article.)

  

  Here Solzhenitsyn is greeted by President Putin at his home. Putin awarded him in 2007 the highest medal of Russia. This was the second visit by Putin to Solzhenitsyn’s dacha(country home) outside Moscow.

  

  So a liberated Russia would have been a pro-German Russia.

  My view of Putin: not an angel, not a devil, nor a great visionary or world leader, but a noble gangster, a clever man, who does the right thing when he can afford to, but does not want to openly confront the Jews, at least NOT YET, and end up as Hitler or Khaddafi did:http://johndenugent.com/?s=putin

  …….Comment

  #Orthodox Nationalist
  orthodoxnationalist@gmail.com
  73.200.248.171
  Excellent article. Now I fully understood why many in the so called WN “movement” are thumbing their noses when I mention your name. What I really dislike is their arrogance when it comes to “other” white people, in my case being eastern European. Hitler did not wanted any real nationalist movement in eastern Europe. He agreed to the elimination of Corneliu Codreanu in Romania and ordered German troops to back general Antonescu in his coup against The Iron Guard government when he faced a mutiny in the Romanian Army. All the Iron Guard members who escaped to Germany and seeked asylum in 1941 were interned in camps like Buchenwald, treated well however, but they were not allowed to fight in the German Wehrmacht or Waffen SS until August 23rd 1944 when they started a Waffen SS regiment and a Romanian division under the command of Gen. Platon Chirnoagă. I see that these WN that I’m encountering now, are not true WN but are mostly anglo-saxon supremacists that dislike any kind of religious ideas, basically being neo-marxists profoundly materialsts. This is why there is so much support for the Azov type brigades in Ukraine that in fact are doing the deeds of NWO. Than you Mr. John de Nugent, you’re doing great work.