When a refugee spotted a heavily-pregnant woman walking alone, he viciously attacked her, raping her for several hours before leaving her bloodied and traumatized. However, when he appeared before the court, the sadistic asylum seeker had just one Western amenity to blame for his sickening assault.
After more than 1,400 of mass slaughter and conquest, the Muslim world has discovered that the sword isn’t always the most effective method for Islamizing the West. Islamic migrants are perpetuating rape jihad with the ultimate goal being forced adherence of non-Muslims to Sharia law. In short, Muslim men sexually harass women and children, prompting Westerners to dress more modestly, stay indoors, and engage in gender segregation in the hopes that they will not be abused. What always follows is the stealth implementation and enforcement of oppressive Sharia law.
Naji N., whose identity remains withheld due to Germany’s censorship laws, was only in Hannover for a year when his criminal record saw the addition of violent rape. After seeing a pregnant woman who was carrying twins walking alone near the Ihme Zentrum shopping center, Naji knocked her to the ground, dragged her to the elevator, and began brutally beating her. As the bloodied and battered woman screamed for help, Naji repeatedly raped her.
After raping the 22-year-old pregnant victim for 2 hours before she managed to escape his clutches, Naji addressed the Landgericht Berlin regional court, blaming his inexcusable actions on his newfound love of Western alcohol.German online newspaper Bild reports that the 27-year-old Moroccan native explained to defense attorney Philipp Kaiser this week that he only committed the crimes because he had a drinking problem that he only developed after his asylum in Europe.
Naji attacked the woman while she was on her way to her apartment in the summer of 2015, hitting her over the head in an attempt to incapacitate her. He dragged his victim to a corner in the business center and continued beating her until she was “covered in blood.” Disturbingly, Naji sadistically rubbed her pregnant belly as he sexually assaulted her for several hours. The woman finally managed to kick Naji, allowing her to run to a nearby business for help. Witnesses described the woman as wearing only a t-shirt that was soaked in her own blood, The Old Continent translates.
“She had massive facial injuries and cried. She couldn’t speak a full sentence. Her words were cut off again and again by shrieking and tears,“ commenting in the witness stand, an investigator with the police said that at the time.
Fortunately, the woman was able to deliver healthy twin babies 2 months later. Of course, she will forever live with the trauma inflicted by Naji’s debauched attack.
While Naji blames his own overindulgence in Western amenities as reasoning for his depravity, he could have just as easily claimed that it is his religious belief and right to rape non-Muslim women. In fact, the approval of rape and sex slavery is an intrinsic part of Islam.
When his men waged war on unbelieving tribes, Muhammad motivated them by encouraging them to take as many slaves as they wanted. Being the Islamic prophet and only sanctioned interpreter of the Quran, Muhammad cited scripture to justify raping and impregnating non-Muslim women even while their husbands were still alive.
While Islam lures believing men with the promise of eternal sexual pleasure for waging violent jihad on earth, it likewise promotes its backward beliefs by motivating its members to enslave unbelievers and vindicating them from wrongdoing. This is the culture and religion we are importing. We cannot expect to reform it by offering it home to fester.
It is against Islam to rape Muslim women, but Muhammad actually encouraged the rape of others captured in battle. This hadith provides the context for the Qur’anic verse (4:24):
Actually, as the hadith indicates, it wasn’t Muhammad, but “Allah the Exalted” who told the men to rape the women in front of their husbands – which is all the more reason to think of Islam differently from other religions.
Note also that the husbands of these unfortunate victims were obviously alive after battle. This is important because it flatly contradicts those apologists who like to argue that the women Muhammad enslaved were widowed and thus unable to fend for themselves. (Even if the apologists were right, what sort of a moral code is it that forces a widow to choose between being raped and starving?)
There are several other episodes in which Muhammad is offered the clear opportunity to disavow raping women – yet he instead offers advice on how to proceed. In one case, his men were reluctant to devalue their new slaves for later resale by getting them pregnant. Muhammad was asked about coitus interruptus in particular:
As indicated, the prophet of Islam did not mind his men raping the women, provided they ejaculated within the bodies of their victims.
As one might imagine, Muhammad’s obvious approval of raping women captured in battle and his own personal participation as recorded in many places is of intense inconvenience to the Muslim apologists of our time. For this reason, some of them attempt to explain away these many episodes and Qur’anic references to sex with captives by pretending that these are cases in which women have fled bad marriages and sought refuge with the Muslims. Some apologists even refer to them as “wives,” even though the Qur’an makes a clear distinction between “those whom thy right hand possesses” and true wives (see Sura 33:50).
Beyond the desperation of the 21st century apologist however, there is absolutely nothing in the historical text that supports this rosy revision of Muslim history. The women of the Banu Mustaliq were sold into slavery following their rape:
In fact, female slaves were traded like any other simple commodity by Muhammad and his band of devoted followers:
Is it Islamic to sell one’s wife for horses? Clearly these were not wives!
More importantly, by definition a “captured” woman is not one who is fleeing her husband. She is fleeing her captor (ie. the Muslim slave raider). This hadith describes a typical raid, in which the women and children are captured as they are attempting to flee the attacking Muslims:
The Muslim narrator sees the women trying to escape (following the massacre of their men) and cuts off their route by shooting an arrow into their path. These aren’t women trying to seek refuge with the Muslims. They are trying to avoid capture by the Muslims.
The same hadith goes on to recount that Muhammad personally demanded one of the captured women for his own use:
The prophet of Islam and his companions used war to collect women for personal sexual use and for trading. Unless she was arbitrarily declared as someone’s wife, the woman became a sex slave. In no case was her fate tied to anything that she had personally done, nor was she given a choice about her future.