A German comrade and friend cooks up some breaded mushrooms:
Papa serves up some culinary love
The magic of Christmas is the idea of love, sharing and hope. This is why even many skeptics are ”cultural Ã‡hristians.”
Adolf Hitler had great reverence for Jesus.
Hitler believed in Jesus, not Judeo-Christianity
â€¦..Hitler was not anti-Jesus!
I have written one hundred times how Hitler was NOT an atheist, and in fact believed in God, the immortality of the soul, and that Jesus was a divine being.
Amazingly, the new version of Wikipedia articleâ€™s on Hitlerâ€™s Table Talk reflects this, though full of defamatory Hitler-bashing by proven liars such as Albert Speer and Count Ciano, later executed as a traitor.
My new video (in fluent German, with big English subtitles) goes into the fact that Hitler did not see himself as a religious figure, but a politician, but secretly he believed in reincarnation, which the Christian Gnostics also fervently believed in, as well as many ancient and modern White pagans and heathens (Greeks, Hindus, Vikings, Kelts, etc. See my http://johndenugent.com/reincarnation-evidence)
AH was just one of many great men and women who believed in reincarnation. In Luftwaffe Colonel Pickerâ€™s famous book â€œTable Talk,â€ p38,http://www.archive.org/stream/HitlersTableTalk/HitlersTableTalk_djvu.txt, spoken on the 23rd of September, 1941, in the evening:
â€œThe elements of which our body is made belong to the cycle of nature; and as for our soul, itâ€™s possible that it might return to limbo, until it gets an opportunity to REINCARNATE itself.â€
â€¦.Famous men on reincarnation
REINCARNATION â€“ FAMOUS PEOPLE
â€œI look upon death to be as necessary to the constitution as sleep. We shall rise refreshed in the morning.â€ And, â€œFinding myself to exist in the world, I believe I shall, in some shape or other always exist.â€
Jack London, author, best known for book Call of the Wild
â€œI did not begin when I was born, nor when I was conceived. I have been growing, developing, through incalculable myriads of millenniums. All my previous selves have their voices, echoes, promptings in me. Oh, incalculable times again shall I be born.â€
Napoleon was fond of telling his generals that he believed in the law of reincarnation and even told them who he believed to have been in a previous life.
â€œI have been born more times than anybody except Krishna.â€
â€œAs we live through thousands of dreams in our present life, so is our present life only one of many thousands of such lives which we enter from the other more real life and then return after death. Our life is but one of the dreams of that more real life, and so it is endlessly, until the very last one, the very real the life of God.â€
â€œI adopted the theory of reincarnation when I was 26. Genius is experience. Some think to seem that it is a gift or talent, but it is the fruit of long experience in many livesâ€.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, (German poet, playwright and scientist)
â€œAs long as you are not aware of the continual law of Die and Be Again, you are merely a vague guest on a dark Earth.â€
â€œLive so that thou mayest desire to live again â€“ that is thy duty â€“ for in any case thou wilt live again!â€
â€œI cannot think of permanent enmity between man and man, and believing as I do in the theory of reincarnation, I live in the hope that if not in this birth, in some other birth I shall be able to hug all of humanity in friendly embrace.â€
Ralph Waldo Emerson
â€œThe soul comes from without into the human body, as into a temporary abode, and it goes out of it anew it passes into other habitations, for the soul is immortal.â€ â€œIt is the secret of the world that all things subsist and do not die, but only retire a little from sight and afterwards return again. Nothing is dead; men feign themselves dead, and endure mock funerals? and there they stand looking out of the window, sound and well, in some strange new disguise.â€
General George S. Patton
â€œSo as through a glass and darkly, the age long strife I see, Where I fought in many guises, many names, but always me.â€
â€œReincarnation contains a most comforting explanation of reality by means of which Indian thought surmounts difficulties which baffle the thinkers of Europe.â€
â€œI know I am deathless. No doubt I have died myself ten thousand times before. I laugh at what you call dissolution, and I know the amplitude of time.â€
â€œOur birth is but a sleep and a forgetting; The Soul that rises with us, our lifeâ€™s Star, Hath had elsewhere its setting. And cometh from afar.â€
Jalalu Rumi (Islamic Poet of the 13th century)
â€œI died as a mineral and became a plant, I died as a plant and rose to animal, I died as animal and I was man. Why should I fear ? When was I less by dying?â€
â€œMy life often seemed to me like a story that has no beginning and no end. I had the feeling that I was an historical fragment, an excerpt for which the preceding and succeeding text was missing. I could well imagine that I might have lived in former centuries and there encountered questions I was not yet able to answer; that I had been born again because I had not fulfilled the task given to me.â€
Henry David Thoreau
â€œWhy should we be startled by death? Life is a constant putting off of the mortal coil â€“ coat, cuticle, flesh and bones, all old clothes.â€
â€œI am confident that there truly is such a thing as living again, that the living spring from the dead,and that the souls of the dead are in existence.â€
Jesus Christ in Gnostic Gospels: Pistis Sophia
â€œSouls are poured from one into another of different kinds of bodies of the world.â€
It is not more surprising to be born twice than once; everything in nature is resurrection.â€
â€œGod generates beings, and sends them back over and over again, till they return to Him.â€
Josephus (most well known Jewish historian from the time of Jesus)
â€œAll pure and holy spirits live on in heavenly places, and in course of time they are again sent down to inhabit righteous bodies.â€
Honorï¿½ Balzac (French writer)
â€œAll human beings go through a previous lifeâ€¦ Who knows how many fleshly forms the heir of heaven occupies before he can be brought to understand the value of that silence and solitude of spiritual worlds?â€
Arthur Schopenhauer (Philosopher)
â€œWere an Asiatic to ask me for a definition of Europe, I should be forced to answer him: It is that part of the world which is haunted by the incredible delusion that man was created out of nothing, and that his present birth is his first entrance into life.â€
Paul Gauguin (French post-impressionist painter)
â€œWhen the physical organism breaks up, the soul survives. It then takes on another body.â€
â€œFriends are all souls that weâ€™ve known in other lives. Weâ€™re drawn to each other. Even if I have only known them a day., it doesnâ€™t matter. Iâ€™m not going to wait till I have known them for two years, because anyway, we must have met somewhere before, you know.â€
Among the ancient Greeks, reincarnation was a doctrine closely associated with the followers of the philosopher and mathematician Pythagoras. According to Pythagorean teaching, the soul survives physical death.. After a series of reincarnations each one following a period of psychic cleansing in spiritual environments the soul becomes free eternally from the cycle of reincarnations.
â€¦..Excellent, truthful video on Hitler versus Christianity (NOT against Jesus!) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x90kI0zjI7E
I note here, parenthetically, that it confirms, indirectly, at 18:3) that Hitler was open as am I to the idea that humans are NOT alone as intelligent life forms in the universe.
â€œâ€¦understanding of the universe will become widespread, the majority of men will know that the stars are not sources of light but worlds, perhaps inhabited worlds like ours,â€¦..â€ -Adolf Hitler, Table Talk
(More on this here: http://johndenugent.com/ufos-the-third-reich-after-1945-and-the-pleiadians/and also
Strange possible UFO photo from Berchtesgaden, Hitlerâ€™s Eagleâ€™s Nest area; Colin Andrew info on Frenchman abducted in 1966 by extremely advanced exonordics
â€¦..Wikipedia sometimes tells the truth even about Hitler!
Hitlerâ€™s Table Talk
Hitlerâ€™s Table Talk (German: TischgesprÃ¤che im FÃ¼hrerhauptquartier) is the title given to a series ofWorld War II conversations and monologues delivered by Adolf Hitler, which were transcribed from 1941 to 1944. Hitlerâ€™s remarks were recorded by Heinrich Heim, Henry Picker, and Martin Bormann, and later published by different editors, under different titles, in three different languages.
Martin Bormann, who was serving as Hitlerâ€™s private secretary, persuaded Hitler to allow a team of specially picked officers to record in shorthand his private conversations for posterity. The first notes were taken by the lawyer Heinrich Heim, starting from 5 July 1941 to mid March 1942. Taking his place, Henry Picker took notes from 21 March 1942 until 2 August 1942,after which Heinrich Heim and Martin Bormann continued appending material off and on until 1944.
The talks were recorded at the FÃ¼hrer Headquarters in the company of Hitlerâ€™s inner circle. The talks not only dwell on war and foreign affairs, but also Hitlerâ€™s characteristic attitudes onreligion,culture, philosophy, personal aspirations, and his feelings towards his enemies and friends.
History of the Table Talk
The history of the document is relatively complex, as numerous individuals were involved, working at different times, collating different parts of the work. This effort spawned two distinct notebooks, which were translated into multiple languages, and covered, in some instances, non-overlapping time-frames due to ongoing legal and copyright issues.
All editions and translations are based on the two original German notebooks, one by Henry Picker, and another based on a more complete notebook by Martin Bormann (which is often called theBormann-Vermerke, or â€œBormann Notesâ€). Henry Picker was the first to publish theTable Talk, doing so in 1951 in the original German. This was followed by the Frenchtranslation in 1952 by Francois Genoud, a Swiss financier. The English edition came in 1953, which was translated by R. H. Stevens and Norman Cameron and published under the editorial hand of historian Hugh Trevor-Roper.Both the French and English translations were based on the Bormann-Vermerke manuscript, while Pickerâ€™s volume was based on his original notes, as well as the notes he directly acquired from Heinrich Heim spanning from 5 July 1941 to March 1942. The original German content of theBormann-Vermerke was not published until 1980 by historian Werner Jochmann. However Jochmannâ€™s edition is not complete, as it lacks the 100 entries made by Picker between 12 March and 1 September 1942.
Albert Speer, who was the Minister of Armaments and War Production for Nazi Germany, confirmed the authenticity of Henry Pickerâ€™s Table Talk in his 1976 memoirs. Speer stated that Hitler often spoke long-windedly about his favorite subjects, while dinner guests were reduced to silent listeners. In the presence of his â€œsuperiors by birth and educationâ€ Hitler made a sincere effort to â€œpresent his thoughts in as impressive manner as possible.â€ It is important to remember, Speer noted, â€œthis collection includes only those passages in Hitlerâ€™s monologues â€” they took up one to two hours every day â€“which struck Picker as significant. Complete transcripts would reinforce the sense of stifling boredom.â€
According to historian Max Domarus, Hitler insisted on absolute silence when he delivered his monologues. No one was allowed to interrupt or contradict him. Magda Goebbels reported toGaleazzo Ciano that, â€œIt is always Hitler who talks! He can be FÃ¼hrer as much as he likes, but he always repeats himself and bores his guests.â€
[This is an absolute lie. Magda Goebbels adored Hitler, was fervently pro-Hitler, and in fact married Joseph Goebbels just to be and stay in the inner Hitler circle. Her greatest joy was when, in the bunker in Berlin in 1945, Hitler gave her his own party membership pin before he died. She, her husband and all the children died rather than live in the postwar Germany of the Allies. ]
Although considered authentic, contentious issues remain over particular aspects of the work, including the reliability of particular translated statements within the French and English editions,the questionable manner in which Martin Bormann may have edited his notes, and disputes over which edition is most reliable. As a result, a high level of critical awareness of its potential drawbacks as a source is advisable when using Table Talk.
Hitlerâ€™s comments on religion
Between 1941 and 1944, the period in which the Table Talk was being transcribed, a number of Hitlerâ€™s intimates cite him expressing negative views of Christianity, including Joseph Goebbels,Albert Speer, and Martin Bormann. However Nazi General Gerhard Engel reports that in 1941 Hitler asserted, â€œI am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so.â€
Similarly Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber reported that Hitler â€œundoubtedly lives in belief in God â€¦ He recognizes Christianity as the builder of western culture.â€
Ian Kershaw concluded that Hitler had deceived Faulhaber, noting his â€œevident ability to simulate, even to potentially critical church leaders, an image of a leader keen to uphold and protect Christianityâ€. The Table Talk indicates Hitler continued to wish for a united Christian Church of Germany for some time after 1937, in line with his earlier policy of uniting all the churches to bring them more firmly under Nazi control, so they would support Nazi policy and act as a unifying rather than divisive force in Germany, that had largely proven unsuccessful.
By 1940, however, it was public knowledge that Hitler had abandoned even the syncretist idea of a positive Christianity.Instead, after 1938 Hitler began to publicly support a Nazified version of science, particularly social Darwinism, at the core of Nazi ideology in place of a religious one â€“ a development that is reflected in private in his increasingly hostile remarks towards religion in Table Talk.
In the Table Talk, Hitler praised Julian the Apostateâ€˜s Three Books Against the Galilaeans, an anti-Christian tract from AD 362. In the entry dated 21 October 1941 Hitler stated, â€œWhen one thinks of the opinions held concerning Christianity by our best minds a hundred, two hundred years ago, one is ashamed to realize how little we have since evolved.
I didnâ€™t know that Julian the Apostate had passed judgment with such clear-sightedness on Christianity and Christiansâ€¦
The Galilean, who later was called the Christ, intended something quite different. He must be regarded as a popular leader who took up His position against Jewryâ€¦
And itâ€™s certain that Jesus was not a Jew. The Jews, by the way, regarded Him as the son of a whore, of a whore and a Roman soldier [the centurion ( = captain) Pantera]. The decisive falsification of Jesusâ€™s doctrine was the work of St. Paulâ€¦
Paul of Tarsus (his name was Saul, before the road to Damascus) was one of those who persecuted Jesus most savagely.â€
And author Konrad Heiden has quoted Hitler as stating, â€œWe do not want any other god than Germany itself. It is essential to have fanatical faith and hope and love in and for Germany.â€
*** But Heiden was a liar and half-Jew!
Even Jewish historians now dismiss Heiden as a pathological liar! And he was a half-Jew!
This led to a widespread consensus among historians, sustained over a long period of time following the initial work of William Shirer in the 1960s, that Hitler was anti-clerical. This continues to be the mainstream position on Hitlerâ€™s religious views, and these views continue to be supported by quotations from the English translation of Table Talk. The remarks that continue to be widely accepted as genuine include such quotes as â€˜Christianity is the prototype of Bolshevism: the mobillization by the Jew of the masses of slaves with the object of undermining society.â€™
Table Talk also attributes to Hitler a confidence in science over religion: â€œScience cannot lieâ€¦ Itâ€™s Christianity thatâ€™s the liarâ€. Michael Burleigh contrasted Hitlerâ€™s public pronouncements on Christianity with those in Table Talk, suggesting that Hitlerâ€™s real religious views were â€˜a mixture of materialist biology, a faux-Nietzschean contempt for core, as distinct from secondary, Christian values, and a visceral anti-clericalism.â€™
Richard Evans also reiterated the view that Nazism was secular, scientific and anti-religious in outlook in the last volume of his trilogy on Nazi Germany, writing, â€˜Hitlerâ€™s hostility to Christianity reached new heights, or depths, during the war;â€™ his source for this was the 1953 English translation of Table Talk.
Ian Kershaw notes, however, that they are imperfect translations, with a tendency to miss words and leave out lines. He uses the original German sources for preference, advising â€˜due cautionâ€™ in using the English translations.
In 2003 two challenges appeared to this consensus view. One was from Richard Steigmann-Gall. As part of a wider thesis that portrayed Hitler as at least a cultural Christian, he argued that several passages in Table Talk revealed Hitler to be a great admirer of the cultural aspects of Christianity, and somebody who held Jesus in high esteem.
â€¦.sublime Yuletide video â€“ many â€œChristianâ€ customs are from ancient Aryan beliefs and folkways
He also suggested that the conversations do not reveal Hitler as an atheist or an agnostic, a worldview Hitler continued to denigrate the Soviet Union for promoting.
However, he admitted that they showed an â€˜unmistakable ruptureâ€™ with Hitlerâ€™s earlier religious views, which Steigmann-Gall characterised as Christian. He attributes this to Hitlerâ€™s anger at his failure to exert control over the German churches, and suggests it was not anger at Christianity itself. Steigmann-Gallâ€™s views proved highly controversial, although as John S. Conway pointed out, the differences between his thesis and the earlier consensus were mostly about the â€˜degree and timingâ€™ of Nazi anti-clericalism.
In the same year, the historical validity of remarks in the English and French translations of Table Talk dating from the 1950s was challenged in a new partial translation by Richard Carrier and Reinhold Mittschang, who went so far as to call them â€˜entirely untrustworthyâ€™, suggesting they had been altered by Francois Genoud as part of a deliberate forgery to enhance Hitlerâ€™s views. They put forward a new translation of twelve quotations from the text preserved at the Library of Congress which portrayed Hitler as a committed Christian, leading Carrier to the conclusion Hitler was â€˜a candid (and bigoted) Protestant.â€™ 
Richard Carrier maintains that much of Trevor-Roperâ€™s English edition is actually a verbatim translation of Genoudâ€™s French, and not the original German. Carrier asserts that a textual analysisbetween Pickerâ€™s original German text and Genoudâ€™s French translation reveals that Genoudâ€™s version is at best a poor translation, and in some instances fraudulent. Many of the quotations used to assert Hitlerâ€™s anti-Christianity are derived from the Genoud/Trevor-Roper translation. Carrier cautions that no one â€œwho quotes this text is quoting what Hitler actually said.â€
One disputed example includes Hitlerâ€™s statement that, â€œOur epoch will certainly see the end of the disease of Christianity.â€ The original German reads, â€œDie Zeit, in der wir leben, ist die Erscheinung des Zusammenbruchs dieser Sache.â€ Which Carrier translates (in bold) as:
â€œI have never found pleasure in maltreating others, even if I know it isnâ€™t possible to maintain oneself in the world without force. Life is granted only to those who fight the hardest. It is the law of life: Defend yourself! The time in which we live has the appearance of the collapse of this idea. It can still take 100 or 200 years. I am sorry that, like Moses, I can only see the Promised Land from a distance.â€
The Trevor-Roper edition also quotes Hitler saying, â€œI realize that man, in his imperfection, can commit innumerable errors but to devote myself deliberately to error, that is something I cannot do.I shall never come personally to terms with the Christian lie. In acting as I do, Iâ€™m very far from the wish to scandalise. But I rebel when I see the very idea of Providence flouted in this fashion. Itâ€™s a great satisfaction for me to feel myself totally foreign to that world.â€ However the original German reads:
Ich weiÃŸ, dass der Mensch in seiner Fehlerhaftigkeit tausend Dinge falsch machen wird. Aber entgegen dem eigenen Wissen etwas falsch tun, das kommt nicht in Frage! Man darf sich persÃ¶nlich einer solchen LÃ¼ge niemals fÃ¼gen. Nicht weil ich andere Ã¤rgern will, sondern weil ich darin eine VerhÃ¶hnung der ewigen Vorsehung erkenne. Ich bin froh, wenn ich mit denen keine innere Verbindung habe.
Which Carrier translates: â€œI know that humans in their defectiveness will do a thousand things wrong. But to do something wrong against oneâ€™s own knowledge, that is out of the question! One should never personally accept such a lie [as do not defend yourself]. Not because I want to annoy others, but because I recognize therein a mockery of Eternal Providence. I am glad if I have no internal connection with them.â€
According to Carrier, there are also instances of omission. In the original German Picker and Jochmannâ€™s text, Hitler had stated, â€œWhat man has over the animals, possibly the most marvelous proof of his superiority, is that he has understood there must be a Creative Power!â€ However this text is missing from both the Genoud and Trevor-Roper translations.The problem of omitted sentences is an issue also noted by Kershaw, although he attaches less significance to it, merely advising â€˜due cautionâ€™ when using it as a source.
Genoud (who died in 1996) had specifically denied earlier claims that he had inserted words in the manuscript, pointing out that it was close-typed apart from handwritten additions by Bormann and therefore such insertions would not have been possible. Carrierâ€™s thesis that the English translation should be dispensed with has not been accepted by Derek Hastingsor Steigmann-Gall, who despite referencing the controversies raised by Carrier, ultimately presumed the Table Talkâ€™s authenticity.
The John Hay Library in Providence, Rhode Island, contains much of the personal library of the courageous German genius who tried for 25 years (1920-45) to warn the entire West about the danger posed by satanic judaismâ€¦ It is part of Brown University, and is located near the corner of Prospect Street and that Angell Street which was founded by my ancestor, Thomas Angell, in the 1600s.
The rest of Adolf Hitlerâ€™ private library is found today at the Library of Congress, and I knew the African-American from Louisiana who worked there in the Hitler section. He lived just three apartment doors down from us at the Glebe House in Alexandria, Virginia.
He was a tall, very educated, courteous, well-dressed and handsome man with a mustache. He also spoke excellent French with me, had a French last name, and invited me and Margi three times to visit him there at the Hitler section.
(I think this reinforced my view 1) that there was something unusual going on in my life, and 2) that American blacks, ironically, understand both Hitler and his opponents, the Jews, much better than many whites, both for instinctive and experiential reasons.
Adolf Hitlerâ€™s watercolor â€œMary with Jesusâ€ â€” note the clear and open gaze of the child
(From a very interesting website, which sadly was taken down: http://www.hitlerresearch.org/)
Hitler told Martin Bormann:
Jesus was most certainly not a Jew. The Jews would never have handed one of their own people to the Roman courts; they would have condemned Him themselves.
It is quite probable that a large number of the descendants of the Roman legionaries, mostly Gauls[JdN: in other words, KELTS, often dark-haired and blue-eyed like Mel Gibson, like Hitler himself, or Stonewall Jackson and Nathan Bedford Forrest], were living in Galilee, and Jesus was probably one of them. His mother may well have been a Jewess. But Jesus fought against the materialism of His age, and, therefore, against the Jews.
[JdN: For more on Galilee, a lushly verdant, mountainous and heavily Gentile area (then as now) where Jesus was raised and did most of His preaching:http://johndenugent.com/english/english-christmas-is-coming-our-present-to-you-proven-right-about-the-oil-spill-and-the-gulf-stream/]
I have lived in France, and Galilee is like some of the most beautiful areas of the south of la France.I might note that the ancient word for France was â€œGalliaâ€ (in English, â€œGaulâ€), from the word forKeltâ€¦â€¦Hmmm. (A Keltic area now in Asia Minor/Turkey was long called â€œGalatiaâ€; the â€œApostle Paulâ€ wrote an epistle to the Christians there.
Another scene from green, gorgeous Galileeâ€¦.
A Mormon depiction of Jesus. (The Mormons also believe â€” correctly â€” that many Western people lived in North America long ago.)
[Back to Adolf]
Paul of Tarsus, who was originally one of the most stubborn enemies of the Christians, suddenlyrealized the immense possibilities of using, intelligently and for other ends, an idea which was exercising such great powers of fascination.
[JdN: The key idea is that â€œGod is love,â€ as in the famous phrase in the Gospel of John, especially the concept that God feels love and forgiveness for sinners who regret and forsake their previous egotistical life. M. Scott Peck, M.Dâ€™s huge 1980s bestseller The Road Less Traveled posited that guilt for letting oneself and others down is a universal emotion to which Christianity responded with the message:
God loves the sinner who repents, and sent Jesus, a part of Himself, to come down to earth, live among us and experience our earthly hardships and temptations, and thentake the death penalty for us, paying Himself the supreme price for human sins.
The sinnerâ€™s slate of rotten misdeeds and cutting and lying words is thus wiped clean, and the person is reborn as a new, unselfish, helping individual. He can henceforth live and die without fear of divine wrath, now in this life we live and especially when he dies.
He can more easily abandon his selfish way of living, knowing that a kind, just and loving father rules the world, a god so unselfish he sent his only son to die to cleanse our lives. In my own mystical way, I, John de Nugent, do accept this message.]
[Back to Hitler, as recorded by Martin Bormann]
[Paul] realized that the judicious exploitation of this idea among the non-Jews would give him far greater power in the world than would the promise of material profit to the Jews themselves. It was then that the future St. Paul distorted with diabolical cunning the Christian idea. Out of this idea, which was a declaration of war on the golden calf, on the egotism and the materialism of the Jews, he created a rallying point for slaves of all kinds against the elite, the masters and those in dominant authority. The religion fabricated by Paul of Tarsus , which was later called Christianity, is nothing but the Communism of today ï¿½ Bormann, Table Talk, pp. 721-722)
* * *
I wrote once to a hostile Jew:
Adolf Hitler believed deeply in a divine power, which he frequently called ï¿½Providenceï¿½ (not the city of my birth, capital of Rhode Island, co-founded by an ancestor, Thomas Angell, in 1635.)
Key books from Adolf Hitlerâ€™s personal library, replete with underlinings, comments and exclamation points in pencil, and even a dark-brown hair or two, are found here in the John Hay Library. Located just off Angell Street (on the spot where my ancestor had his orchard), it is part of Brown University, which George Lincoln Rockwell attended 1938-40; see the very accurate report here in Wikipedia) my father knew part of his family, which lived in our town of Barrington, Rhode Island \ï¿½ and it was at Brown that I almost taught American accent to foreign students in 2003, except for a sudden university-wide budget crisis due to stock-market losses.
Hitler had a deep interest in religion for its own merits and also as a way to improve character, cohesion, morality, determination and overcome the fear of death. See this illuminating article from The Atlantic magazine: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200305/ryback
Hitlerâ€™s critique of Churchianity never, ever, ever of Jesus \ï¿½ was that it led us to revere Jews as ï¿½elder brothers in the faithï¿½ and to ï¿½turn the other cheekï¿½ to them.
Hitler was sympathetic to Houston Steward Chamberlainï¿½s view that Jesus ï¿½ judging by his values and his courage ï¿½ had to be mostly Aryan, being from ï¿½Galilee of the Gentiles.ï¿½
[For what little itâ€™s worth, your own Talmud, Jew, says his father was a Roman officer, a centurionnamed Pantera.]
In this regard, I will quote Hutton Gibson, the wonderful father of Mel Gibson, about the â€œelder brother in the faithï¿½:
ï¿½Yeah, Abel had an elder brother, too.â€
Many of the collected papers of the Third Reich were captured intact in 1945 by the Americans â€”the Germans made NO attempt to destroy them because they had NOTHING TO BE ASHAMED OFâ€” and were kept at the Torpedo Factory in that same city of Alexandria, Virginia where we lived 2005-08. (It also was the boyhood city of Robert E. Lee.) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torpedo_Factory_Art_Center).
The factory was converted into an artist studio complex after 1974, and here my first wife (we were married 1976-89 and had two girls) worked and still works as an artist, while I traveled 1987-92 raising money for the WN cause via estate work; she is married now to the almost next-door neighbor from thenâ€¦. :-))
â€œCongress stored documents [there]; the military kept German war films and records in sealed vaults.â€ (from the fourth paragraph here: http://www.torpedofactory.org/history.htm)
Margi had a boyfriend for years who was a very skilled, gifted white artistic painter named Terry. Then around 1994 he got involved with a Jewess, she got him into lucrative Jew-owned galleries, told heim â€œwhat would sell,â€ and his art turned into race-mixing and forlorn, lost-looking, naked white womenâ€¦..
â€œCoronation of Concupiscence,â€ by Terry Rodgers
So many pure coincidencesâ€¦. 😉
â€¦..IMAGES OF NOTRE DAME BASILICA, MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CANADA
JdN: I would like to conclude this blog with some uplifting photos from this gorgeous Christian church built by white people with a thirst for love, beauty, spirituality and nobility.
Is there ONE synagogue in the world that is even one-tenth as beautiful?
I am proud of the men and women of our race who create such things. This race must not perish, but instead let us end the reign of demonism and hellish ugliness.
Mr de Nugent, I thoroughly recommend the book â€˜Hitler: Memoirs of A Confidantâ€™ edited by Henry Turner. It contains the memoirs of Otto Wagener, who was an economic advisor to Hitler from 1928 (or thereabouts) to 1932 (or thereabouts). Importantly, Wagener quotes verbatim many of the discussions he and Hitler had, and regarding Christ in particular, the text of these discussions mirror what you have highlighted here. Like Nietzsche, Hitler wasnâ€™t anti Christ â€“ he was simply anti-Christian-Church, and he noticed that Christâ€™s original message was hijacked VERY early on and the corrupted version of Christâ€™s original message had been a nefarious influence in European Civilization ever since. Being nefarious, and not being rooted in truth, it had weakened its own foundation and this no doubt is the conclusion Hitler came to when he stated that he thought Christianity would likely crumble as a force in the next 100-200 years. What Hitler states in the textBolshevism From Moses To Lenin, prepared by Dietrich Eckhart, is also in alignment with this viewpoint of Hitlerâ€™s.