The only positive thing since 1996 (except maybe Trump or the aggressive new mindset he is triggering), the only element on the world stage today that is even slowing the march of the genocidal NWO, is free speech on the Internet.
…..This has snuck up on almost all of us, me included
Stefan Molyneux here – at the last minute — complaining, explaining and warning … The US government, which is bound by the First Amendment and freedom of speech, and which created the Internet (originally the Pentagon DARPAnet) has in a rather quiet, sneaky, low-profile way handed OVER control of the Net to some very vague international body….”A COLLECTION OF EXPERTS.”
Arizona, Texas, Nevada and Oklahoma have argued the handover is unconstitutional.
(Reuters) – A long-planned transfer of the internet’s technical management from the U.S. government to a global community of stakeholders is expected to take place on Saturday despite last-minute attempts by conservative politicians and officials to delay the changeover.
The U.S. Department of Commerce is due to cede stewardship of ICANN, or the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, as scheduled after a lawsuit seeking to halt the transition was denied by a federal judge in Texas on Friday.
The U.S. government has been the primary manager of the internet’s address book since 1988 largely because it was invented in the country. Critics of the handover have attempted to block or delay it on grounds it could jeopardize free speech online, claims that the Obama administration and technology companies have said lack merit.
The lawsuit filed on Wednesday against the federal government by the Republican states of Arizona, Texas, Nevada and Oklahoma argued the handover was unconstitutional and required congressional approval.
ICANN, a California-based nonprofit, manages the database for top-level domain names such as .com and .net and their corresponding numeric addresses that allow computers to connect.
After the transfer, ICANN will be governed by a collection of academics, technical experts, private industry and government representatives, public interest advocates and individual users around the world, in what it calls a “multi-stakeholder process.”
Hunh??????? Who are this “collection”? Inquiring minds want to know!
How would a President Killary (here insanely cackling as usual) and Angela Merkel treat free speech?
We KNOW that is was Merkel who successfully urged Zuckerberg of Facebook to censor free speech at FB.
It seems that the jewsmedia and Obama have quietly slipped this transfer in there. Why has Trump said nothing? Is he just so busy he is uninformed?, I admit that I was, and yet I as a 7-day-a-week blogger try to stay very well-read and go through two dozen current-events emails and websites a day.