EN, FR, DE: Paris under German Occupation "a romp"; Obama outsourced

Spread the love

First, a little humor….

==========ON THE POSSIBILITY SOME PEOPLE REINCARNATE

I had another radio interview today with Clayton Douglas, the 6-foot-four Texan with the outlaw persona who is also a great writer.

Clayton Douglas' website: www.freeamerican.com

Here was today’s VERY IMPORTANT RADIO SHOW on the topic of the evidence of life after death and the possibility that SOME people have more than one life on this earth. And I go into WHY this is SO important a question. I feel[ very good about this show.

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/claydouglas/2010/02/05/free-american-hour

A comrade wrote me re reincarnation:

* * *

I thought the juze believed that they had just one life.

I replied:

* * *

No, the kabbalists among them mostly believe in reincarnation. This was one of several trends in judaism for centuries, but after the Hassidic juze arose in Poland in the 1600s it became a central doctrine of many Orthodox.

Of course many regular juze are atheists. The key is this: the occult leaders of judaism believe in the kabbalah, the occult and in reincarnation.

* * *

He replied:

* * *
Since the kabbalists believe in reincarnation, maybe that’s why they’re able to perpetrate their evilness forever!
* * *
I responded:
* * *
They are the flip side of what Henry Ford said, that geniuses have a wealth of many lives of learning and experience behind them. (http://johndenugent.com/jdn/2010/01/24/my-plan-for-2010/)
But for their evil purposes, SO DO JUZE have IMMENSE EXPERIENCE!

BTW, look at Obama’s apparent mood and expression in the video here below (the second one)……

This guy is going to lash out and make serious mistakes SOON. He tells an unfunny joke about himself and how his spouse Michelle knows he is not perfect (earning a weak titter of laughter). Then he gets a peeved, snitty look on his face — the sign of a genuine narcissist who cannot take the suddenly end of the adulation — as he discusses the “birther” movement, which justifiably demands to see his REAL birth certificate to show if he is a US citizen — and born on US soil — or NOT.

Obama at the exact moment he says it is wrong to question his citizenship……

=============ON THE DEATH OF FREE SPEECH IN BRITAIN

A comrade wrote re the Whittle/Sheppard scandal:

* * *

I read a document issued by the English Court refusing to shorten the sentence of two fellows who owned and wrote political pieces on a web site. It accused them of stirring up racial hatred against Jews; that they made derogatory remarks about Jews and Black people and printed material that was threatening, abusive or insulting towards various racial groups…

Really? Jews have been doing that to Gentiles for years! Has anyone stirred up more hatred against Gentiles than Jews? Has anyone incited more crime against a race – the White Race – than the Jews? Does anyone direct more libelous speech and insinuations implicating white people of hatred and racism than the Jews?

That document in England is surely one of the most hysterical, paranoid court documents ever produced. If that is the way the Crown Court functions in England their whole judicial system is based on Jewish paranoia. Justice cannot be served with that kind of paranoia running the Courts. It seems that anything and everything in England from a frown on one’s face to a scratch on an automobile can be labeled “anti Semitic.” The abuse of innocent citizens is ghastly. All manner of irrational Jewish fears, unhinged imagination and uncontrollable hysteria grips that country.

Jewish history is filled with the atrocities Jews have committed against others. Even the Old Testament of the Bible is filled with it. Jews are certainly aware of their own horrible history whether we are or not. But they are not sure how much we know or how much we may start remembering with their increasing swindle and racial incitement. That is why they are jumping out of their skins.

The Jews understand what gentile honesty can do to them. Honesty does not put up with the spiritual madness of dishonesty. Honesty does not compromise. Honesty is ruthless and efficient and if gentile men have enough honesty they will act ruthlessly and efficiently to clean up the situation.

Americans must do everything we can to hang on to the sanity and good health of free speech. Under no circumstances must we allow this country to be run by the kind of judicial insanity and paranoia that hold Great Britain in hostage.

* * *

I replied:

* * *

Good post — I’ll add it to my blog today. Hate-speech laws are the red line the fedzog govt must not cross against us. There is no hope if we cannot even complain!

The sad thing is that the writer did not even know these two English comrades’ names! [Send this guy to my blog! These are human beings, Stephen Whittle, 42, and Simon Sheppard, 52, our white brothers we are talking about!]

Except for ME, very few people sent money, wrote letters or wrote up coverage AS I DID (http://www.google.com/search?hl=fr&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Afr%3Aofficial&hs=OPU&q=%22John+de+Nugent%22+%22Stephen+Whittle%22&btnG=Rechercher&lr=&aq=f&oq=, leading to 152 webpages online) of these two heroes during the NINE MONTHS they were in a Homeland Security prison in southern California, least of all the IHR snake Mark Weber, who worked next door!!

Two fifty-dollar money orders I sent to Whittle and Sheppard along with a letter and another letter later

John

==================

Today my blog begins in French and German as well as in English, translating those special posts that are of interest and relevance to our racial brothers and sisters in those languages, cultures and countries.

Each blog will be of special application to those cultures, but of course many aspects of Americana are also relevant to those countries. Since 1915 the USA, for better or worse, has been a dominant world power, and Wall Street was already financially supporting both England and France in WWI long before Woodrow Wilson sent American troops in 1917.

America is a country of 180 million white people, the most numerous white nation on earth, and a country which under the Constitution of 1789 guarantees nearly absolute freedom of speech and the right to own guns, many guns. It is also the country where the Internet was invented and is maintained, by the US Department of Commerce. It is also a country which for 400 years has received some of Europe’s most adventuresome and fearless emigrants, those who chose to uproot themselves and seek a better life and more freedom here. I actually believe that Americans represent, not a cross-section of European genes, but more an emigration from Europe and an immigration into America of the “Viking gene” — in both the positive and negative senses of that word.

It is also a place where the great branches of our race have thoroughly intermarried — the Old Mediterraneans, Kelts, Slavs, Germanic and Finno-Ugric peoples. It is the logical place ofor a pan-aryan movement to arise.

And America is ALSO the white nation MOST under siege.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/01/07/us/07south-graphic/popup.jpg

=============ICE STATION PENNYSLVANIA

(Scene outside our window)

Good thing we have global warming, as President Obongo says, or that white stuff outside might be SNOW! 😉

==============PARIS UNDER GERMAN OCCUPATION “ONE BIG ROMP”

Paris during Nazi occupation was one big romp
A recent exhibition of pictures from occupied Paris has revealed a more relaxed image of the city

[JdN comments: Yes, more relaxed than the Hebrew-wood version with Gestapo running around terorizing the City of Light. Seems the Germans behaved themselves very well — considering it was wartime — and were very likable.]

Matthew Campbell in Paris

The Sunday Times (Britain)

May 25, 2008

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/newcle3998943.ece

A new book which suggests that the German occupation of France encouraged the sexual liberation of women has shocked a country still struggling to come to terms with its troubled history of collaboration with the Nazis.

Like a recent photographic exhibition showing Parisians enjoying themselves under the occupation, the books depiction of life in Paris as one big party is at odds with the collective memory of hunger, resistance and fear.

[JdN comments: “Collective memories” of the self-Chosen?]

It is a taboo subject, a story nobody wants to hear, said Patrick Buisson, author of 1940-1945 Annes Erotiques (erotic years).

It may hurt our national pride, but the reality is that people adapted to occupation.

Many might prefer to forget but, with their husbands in prison camps, numerous women slept not only with German soldiers the young blond barbarians were particularly attractive to French women, says Buisson but also conducted affairs with anyone else who could help them through financially difficult times:


This c. 1942 German Guidebook to Paris advertizes Autumn excursions Monica Sheherezade Cabaret Free Copy [Oy! Vhat iss important iss dee Holocaust! Vhy no mention of dee Jews!?]

They gave way to the advances of the boss, to the tradesman they owed money to, their neighbour. In times of rationing, the body is the only renewable, inexhaustible currency.

Cold winters, when coal was in short supply, and a curfew from 11pm to 5am also encouraged sexual activity, says Buisson, with the result that the birth rate shot up in 1942 even though 2m men were locked up in the camps.

[JdN comments: Nonsense. Former French soldiers were demobilized and sent home. Hundreds of thousands more earned good money, with health insurance, working in German factories doing voluntary or obligatory war production; others who were in the Resistance and were captured labored at work camps.]

The book has stirred painful memories. One French reviewer called it impertinent and another accused Buisson of telling only part of the story by focusing on the beneath the belt history of the occupation. Le Monde, the bible of the French intellectual elite, chided the author, who is the director of French televisions History Channel, for painting life under the occupation as a gigantic orgy.

People who lived through the occupation found it insulting to suggest that they spent it in bed. It makes me really angry, said Liliane Schroeder, 88, who risked her life as a member of the resistance and has published her own journal of the occupation. Its shocking and ridiculous to say life was just a big party, she told The Sunday Times. We had much better things to
do.

Schroeder nevertheless described her life as a messenger in the resistance as a marvellous time in which people got on with life even if they werent laughing. Young women were useful to the resistance, she said, because when a young woman and a man sat in a caf it did not look as if they were plotting. They looked like lovers.

[JdN comments: Honest historians estimate that ONE PERCENT of the French were involved in the Resistance. Most French approved of Germany’s anti-Jewish policies and hoped Germany would defeat the USSR of the psychopath Stalin.]

French sensitivities about the countrys wartime record were demonstrated last month when an exhibition of photographs depicting Parisians enjoying life under the Nazis included a notice explaining that the pictures avoided the reality of occupation and its tragic aspects. The photographs showed well-dressed citizens shopping on the boulevards or strolling in the parks. People crowded into nightclubs.

Women in bikinis swam in a pool.


Germans did excellent color photography in the 1930s, and even more after they occupied France, whose goverment had foolishly declared war on the German Reich in September 1939 over Poland. The Wehrmacht blitzkrieg, conceived by Hitler, was a lightning war that quickly conquered Poland, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Luxembourg, Belgium and France. The British Expeditionary Corps was also defeated soundly and surrounded, but Hitler graciously allowed it to escape at Dunkirk, hoping Churchill would negotiate for peace.

Buisson dedicates a chapter in his book to cinemas, which he describes as hotbeds of erotic activity, particularly when it was cold outside. At a few francs they were cheaper than a hotel room, he writes, and, offering the double cover of darkness and anonymity, propitious for all sorts of outpourings.

The French even had sex in the catacombs, the underground ossuary and warren of subterranean tunnels in Paris: war, Buisson argues, acted as an aphrodisiac, stimulating the survival instinct. He said in an interview:

People needed to prove that they were alive. They did so by making love.

It has been claimed that prostitutes staged the first rebellion against the Nazis by refusing to service the invaders but Buisson called this a myth.

The Germans, he claimed, were welcomed into the citys best brothels, a third of which were reserved for officers. Another 100,000 women in Paris became occasional prostitutes, he said.

Elsewhere, members of the artistic elite drowned their sorrows in debauchery. Simone de Beauvoir, the writer, and Jean-Paul Sartre, the philosopher, were devotees of all-night parties fuelled by alcohol and lust.

It was only in the course of those nights that I discovered the true meaning of the word party, was how de Beauvoir put it. Sartre was no less enthusiastic: Never were we as free as under the German occupation.

De Beauvoir wrote about the quite spontaneous friendliness of the conquerors: she was as fascinated as any by the German cult of the body and their penchant for exercising in nothing but gym shorts.


Hitler promoted relentless physical exercise for all Germans and an innocent eroticism in art. He had grumbled in Mein Kampf (1925) before he came to power (1933) that if one saw passersby on a street suddenly without their clothes on one would be aghast.

In the summer of 1940, wrote Buisson, France was transformed into one big naturist camp. The Germans seemed to have gathered on French territory only to celebrate an impressive festival of gymnastics. The author said he did not want to make light of a tragic part of French history, but there was a need to correct the mythical image of the occupation. In this horrible period, life continued, he said.

It is disturbing to know that while the Jews were being deported, the French were making love. But that is the truth.

Some comments by readers on the Times website:

* * *

Tom Welsh seems to be the only one of the commentors so-far to know that France declared war on Germany. Knowing this makes all the comments on the German invasion or attack onFrance childish. The French wanted war and were beaten by the Wehrmacht in a brilliant campaign.

Rolf, Portland,

My mother who now is 92 lived trough the occupationof Belgium.She always says that these years where the most fantastic years she had .She always said the German soldiers behaved very courtuously.It was unthinkable that a German soldier would harass a Belgian girl.

Pat, Ghent, Belgium

Collaberation happens in all wars.

Fred, Los Angeles,

As it is clear from this intriguing post, the French were not all that eager to be liberated. Life under the Germans was a sight better than under the dreary pre-war Popular Front, and only the communists and their supporters really wanted to see an Allied victory.

John Ries, Northridge, USA

Ask the French how many served in the Waffen-SS, the answer is in the many thousands. Without the French Police help, rounding up the Jews would have been a nearly impossible task for the Germans. Rather the Germans than the French Communist party was what some prefered or stated.

Evans, Notts, UK

Jean-Marie Le Pen described the Nazi occupation of France as not especially inhumane , He was fined 10,000 Euro and given a 3 month suspended prison sentence. Monsieur Le Pen was born in 1928 and lived throughout the occupation. Libert et Egalite, Je crois pas.

Paul Gibbons, M.Keynes, UK

__________________

One Europe

Forum Member

Quote:

Originally Posted by John de NugentParis during Nazi occupation was one big romp

People who lived through the occupation found it insulting to suggest that they spent it in bed. It makes me really angry, said Liliane Schroeder, 88, who risked her life as a member of the resistance

Schoeder? What a French name!

I wonder if she was rather a Jrench

Quote:

Elsewhere, members of the artistic elite drowned their sorrows in debauchery. Simone de Beauvoir, the writer, and Jean-Paul Sartre, the philosopher, were devotees of all-night parties fuelled by alcohol and lust.It was only in the course of those nights that I discovered the true meaning of the word party, was how de Beauvoir put it. Sartre was no less enthusiastic: Never were we as free as under the German occupation.

The dam of lies one day will crumble

Quote:

It is disturbing to know that while the Jews were being deported, the French were making love. But that is the truth.

Quote:

Some comments by readers on the Times website:* * *

Tom Welsh seems to be the only one of the commentors so-far to know that France declared war on Germany. Knowing this makes all the comments on the German invasion or attack onFrance childish. The French wanted war and were beaten by the Wehrmacht in a brilliant campaign.

Rolf, Portland,

My mother who now is 92 lived trough the occupationof Belgium.She always says that these years where the most fantastic years she had .She always said the German soldiers behaved very courtuously.It was unthinkable that a German soldier would harass a Belgian girl.

Pat, Ghent, Belgium

Collaberation happens in all wars.

Fred, Los Angeles,

As it is clear from this intriguing post, the French were not all that eager to be liberated. Life under the Germans was a sight better than under the dreary pre-war Popular Front, and only the communists and their supporters really wanted to see an Allied victory.

John Ries, Northridge, USA

Ask the French how many served in the Waffen-SS, the answer is in the many thousands. Without the French Police help, rounding up the Jews would have been a nearly impossible task for the Germans. Rather the Germans than the French Communist party was what some prefered or stated.

Evans, Notts, UK

Jean-Marie Le Pen described the Nazi occupation of France as not especially inhumane , He was fined 10,000 Euro and given a 3 month suspended prison sentence. Monsieur Le Pen was born in 1928 and lived throughout the occupation. Libert et Egalite, Je crois pas.

Paul Gibbons, M.Keynes, UK

Im glad that people are awakening about the massive propaganda we have been subjected about WWII.

The French have just to compare those pictures and stories with what they experienced under the Allied occupation and its army of black monsters.

Or compare those picture with France under jewish domination and muslim/negro occupation:

__________________

Good post, One Europe!

Price of France winning ( = losing) the war:

Quote:

Nuit de violences Vitry-le-Franois, dans la Marne.Neuf personnes ont t blesses et une soixantaine de vhicules incendis lors dune meute dans la nuit de samedi dimanche Vitry-le-Franois, dans la Marne, a-t-on appris auprs de la prfecture.

==============

translation:

Night of violence at [Vitry-le-Franois, full of blacks and Arabs, near Paris]

Nine persons were injured and at least 60 vehicles burned during a riot Saturday night at Vitry-le-Franois in the Marne region, according to reports from the prefecture.

==============

For years now the Arabs and blacks have been raping and pillaging France, and the Jews have been getting revisionists arrested.

Now they have a midget Jew as president, Sarkozy, whose wife, the First Lady, has her nude pix on the Net!

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by RiemannWe might as well be honest about it.
The worst thing that happened to France and England in the Twentieth Century (and perhaps their whole history) was the suicidal role they played in WWII. We are now facing the consequences of that disaster.
I certainly hope we have learned a lesson.

I and my fiancee Margaret Huffstickler helped translate into English the whole memoirs of general Leon Degrelle.

Believe me, the French were very half-hearted about fighting the Germans. They knew it was a Jew setup.

And millions collaborated with the Germans during the occupation because they DID understand that the enemies of Germany were also the enemies of France.

I can send you my big article on De Gaulle who himself turned anti-Jewish by the late 1950s. Just send me a PM.

Alas, they all wake up too late.

7 Comments

  1. Dear John,
    thank you for your uncompromising pages.
    Below is a link to Croatian wikipage- hm, sorry – about count and prince Laval Nugent.
    I found that you resemble him very much in appearance.
    He was very important person in Croatian history.
    I’m ready to translate for you a few main passages, if needed – prefer PM.
    many regards
    beatrice (nick name for a while).

    http://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laval_Nugent

  2. Ah—- the POOR Jews! The French were having the time of their lives while `the Jews were being deported´. Tsk, tsk, it brings tears to my eyes, the poor dears. Hey kikes, not only did the French have the time of their lives, hell they ENTHUSIASTICALLY turned in every jew they could lay their hands on and the French police was thrilled to put them on the trains. The jewish community ought to have given Eichmann a medal for meritorious service, because not only did he arrange for the trains to run on time, he even gave the kikes FREE tickets! Ger

  3. Clay Douglas mentioned that the Army poisoned him because he scored too highly on the officer-candidate test.

    Bertrand Russell:

    On those rare occasions, when a boy or girl who has passed the age at
    which it is usual to determine social status shows such marked ability
    as to seem the intellectual equal of the rulers, a difficult situation
    will arise, requiring serious consideration. If the youth is content
    to abandon his previous associates and to throw in his lot
    whole-heartedly with the rulers, he may, after suitable tests, be
    promoted, but if he shows any regrettable solidarity with his previous
    associates, the rulers will reluctantly conclude that there is nothing
    to be done with him except to send him to the lethal chamber before
    his ill-disciplined intelligence has had time to spread revolt. (The Scientific Outlook, 1931)

  4. More from Bertrand Russell:

    I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is
    mass psychology…. Its importance has been enormously increased by
    the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most
    influential is what is called ‘education.’ Religion plays a part,
    though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema, and the radio play an
    increasing part…. It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able
    to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and
    is provided by the State with money and equipment.

    Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly
    confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to
    know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been
    perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a
    generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the
    need of armies or policemen.

    ****

    Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age,
    to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the
    authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the
    powers that be will become psychologically impossible.

    Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between
    rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different
    species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an
    organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.
    (The Impact of Science on Society, 1953)

  5. History is never black or white, but shades of grey. Anyone can take a singular piece of evidence and make it say what they want, it is simply a matter of interpretation.

    As for the occupation of France, of course there were those who preferred German occupation, (they preferred right wing politics anyway in general) whilst you have the flip side of the communists, who were for the most part involved with the Resistance movement. The vast majority of French citizens were neither right wing nor left wing, they simply lived- they went to work, spent time with their family, and looked for a little recreation to liven up their monotonous lives.

    They were the apathetic majority, concerned with just living to think too deeply about politics and all its ramifications.

    It was this apathetic majority who were partly the reason why the German occupation was so successful. Ordinary French citzens, indeed all peoples under enemy/foreign occupation will do what they have to in order to survive, even turn on those they once called friends (including family members).

    Let us not forget either that the Allied powers, whilst lending arms and support to the Resistance movements in Europe during World War Two, were very much aware of just who they were dealing with. Neither Britain nor America trusted the Resistance movements, they knew most were Communist, or at the very least were Socialists (Continental Socialism being more left wing than in Britain, and definitely America). The Resistance movements were simply convenient at the time, they fulfilled a role and could be discarded after their usefulness was over, and for the most part were.

    It is important to remember that events in history do not stand alone, they flow and ebb, twisting about one another, with almost forgotten events from the distant past affecting decisions today and tomorrow.

    Hitler was not the creator of the German anti-Semitic fervour of the 1930s, such hatred for the Jews had long been part of Germany, indeed all of Europe and beyond for time immemorial, Hitler merely used something in which he himself believed. The anti-Semitic sentiments of Germany had been on the increase since the mid-19th century, which reached its widest audience during the Great Depression of 1929 and beyond. This is hardly surprising though. The Nazis, and non-Nazis, complained that Jews held key positions and professions in thrall, especially banking, the law and medicine, but what many at the time either did not want to know, or conveniently forgot, was that the Jewish people had already been restricted as to their careeer choices. Many chose the law and medicine because it was some of the few professions in Germany they were allowed to practice, therefore creating a disproportionate number of Jewish people in these professions, compared to Gentiles. Banking has always been used as a stick to beat the Jews with, and has a deep root in European history, which for the Jews is unfortunate- all i will say is go and look up European medieval views on usury (and i don’t mean usury in its extreme sense) and you may just find that they got themselves pigeon-holed.

    It is my opinion though that the Nazi party were voted into power less because of anti-Semite feelings, but because the NSDP represented a pratical solution to Germany’s economic woes at the time. Hitler said he would create jobs- which he did very successfully- he would give them stability in a time when Europe was in a state of politic flux- communist, socialist, liberals, conservatives, facists etc- and that Hitler and/or the NSDP appealed across the board. If a non-unionist voter didn’t care who was in power so as long as they had a job, then Hitler/NSDP looked like the better option. If you were a professional or a middle-class shop owner, why would you want to vote for a party who would take it all away? No, you would vote for a party who would create an economy of growth and with a laissez-faire, which the NSDP promised it would do. If you were wealthy and upper class then the Nazis were pretty much no different than a Conservative party (or for Americans, Republican).

    Importantly, the NSDP were a vital party, they utilised new technology in their campaigning- its possible to say they employed a modern approach to poltical campaigning that most poltical parties still use today- taking advantage of the Germans love of technology (the wireless radio was proportinately owned by more Germans than by any other Europe nations’ citizenry). Besides, its so dramatic to step out of a plane to go and give a rousing speech, whether or not you believe a word the person says! Hitler cut through the tediousness of traditional parties, whilst appealing to a broader range of voters than the Communist party could ever do. He had a winning combination ultimately.

    The world often forgets what it wants to, needs to or fears to remember. Hitler, the Nazis and World War Two are as much a product of past events (namely World War One- which really had nothing to do with anti-Semitic beliefs, since its best not to forget that a great many German heroes of World War One were Jewish- and the crippling Reparations enforced by the Allies at Versailles); worldwide disasters (the Wall Street Crash and the Great Depression, which crushed Germany’s fragile post-war re-builing), and of course pure circumstance- that a person can have the ideology, the will for power and the force of personality to combine these with past events, current events and widespread beliefs/myths/suspicions and create a new nation, whether that is for good or evil.

    Hitler and the NSDP did do good things for the Germany of the 1930s, but its always best to remember that they tore Europe and much of the world apart. Yes, German citzens and German-occupied nations could have ‘romp’ of a war if they wished, but by the same token plenty led lives of misery and degradation during the 1930s and 1940s in Germany and German-occupied countries directly as a result of the Nazis. Again, the vast majority or Europeans affected by World War Two simply wanted to live, to live through the lack of food, to live through the fear that is wartime, and at the end of the day even in the direst of circumstances you have to laugh at some point or what’s the point in living anyway.

    Phew! All that is basically to say, you need to look at the whole, and not simply what you want to look at- what is there as opposed to what you see. I feel that too many of the comments/articles found here lack a depth of knowledge and understanding of what they are reading/seeing, they are consistently using inconsistent ideas.

    With regard to what we are allowed to express about the past, about accepted canon (that is historical evidence) such views are always changing. It is far more acceptable now to find merit in parts of Hitler and the NSDP, whilst also continuing to be appalled at his role in history, you merely need to do your research methodically and impartially. For instance, I believe Hitler and the NSDP did many good things for Germany, but i also believe he fostered ideas that have scarred Europe and the world for generations yet to come.

    History is written by the victors and imposed upon the defeated. It is the role of historians- professional and amateur alike- to uncover the truth before that truth is lost forever, no matter how unpalatable. How we apply history to the present day is another matter entirely and one that will always be misused and twisted by those who are able to do so… even by you.

    • Good comment and I would answer at length but for some urgent work.

      I think you still represent the Estalishment standard view on things, though you have surmounted the worst Pavlovian conditioning that “Hitler-was-the-evillest-man-who-ever-lived-because-he-gassed-six-million-Jews-and-started-WWII.” But you have to get totally deprogrammed. And in case you haven’t noticed, the Estalbishment has led the West to an economic and racial catastrophe, looming now and soon a reality.

      I would also not assume that I have not examined certain issues in depth. I have, for 31 years. I speak fluent German, lived in Germany, knew people who realy knew Hitler, and I majored in German, graduating with a magna cum laude from Georgetown in 1981. (You might go to the “Wikipedia article on JdN” on me at the top of the home homepage. Wiki deleted it, just one more case of censorship.)

      I think the Establishment view is now, to use the language of my minor, passé. 🙂

      Something new is coming, natsoc 2.0, what I call social nationism, or Solutreanism. Taking what was best from Hitler and recalling his three great mistakes……

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*