Chris Bollyn on Alan Axelrod; Norwegian cop: gang rapists are all Muslims

Spread the love

A comrade sent along to me the latest exposé from the brilliant pro-white researcher and investigative journalist Christopher Bollyn. Chris is a real Chicagoland reporter, and one that we need one to monitor another Windy City guy, Obama (whose real biological father may have been the black militant Chicagoan Frank Davis [See my post here:].

I got to know Chris when we were both working for American Free Press in 2005, and I met his two sweet kids and his smart and dedicated wife Helje, an Estonian. (Btw, Estonia provided more soldiers per capita to the Waffen-SS to fight bolshevism, and suffered worse Soviet atrocities, than any other country in Europe in WWII. The Estonians are an ultra-brave people who by genes and language are related to their neighbors, the Finns of our comrade Henrik Holappa.)


Estonian Waffen-SS soldiers and kitten, who hopefully will NOT play with the cute grenade…. 😉
Since then he had a dispute with management and quit, then shockingly found police shadowing him for no good reason, who then came right on his own lawn and tasered him, breaking his arm as well. Found guilty of resisting arrest (this gets so Orwellian), Bollyn (another Norman name, btw) fled the country and is now heroically exposing the juish enemy of freedom and truth on his excellent website

Now I have often written about Rahm Emanuel, the Israeli ju who is always at Barack Hussein Obama’s side as he lurches from one disaster to another. But there is yet another Khazar guiding Obongo’s every step, and this is David Axelrod.

Here is Chris Bollyn’s report:

* * *

The Axelrod Factor: Why Obama Fails to Deliver

January 30, 2010After one year in office, President Barack Obama has failed to deliver on any of his key campaign promises.  Public opinion of the Obama White House has clearly changed.  Obama has only succeeded in protecting the outrageous 9-11 deception, wasting billions of dollars in bailing out Maurice Greenberg’s criminal enterprise A.I.G. and the corrupt investment banks he insured, and increasing the killing and suffering in the Middle East and Central Asia.  To understand why Obama seems unable to deliver we need to know much more about his Senior Advisor David Axelrod — the man who made Obama president.   

After one year, even the New African asks Obama, “Where is the hope?” 

“What went wrong?” Pat Oliphant asks the “Great Obama.” [JdN: Oliphant was once a strong Obama backer.] 

“Now what?” Time magazine asks of the president who was elected on promises of change but fails to deliver.  He can’t even close the outrageous gulag of Guantanamo?  What’s wrong?  

“Who is Barack Obama?” Bob Herbert of the New York Times asks, “Americans are still looking for the answer, and if they don’t get it soon — or if they don’t like the answer — the president’s current political problems will look like a walk in the park.” 

“Mr. Obama promised during the campaign that he would be a different kind of president, one who would preside over a more open, more high-minded administration that would be far more in touch with the economic needs of ordinary working Americans. But no sooner was he elected than he put together an economic team that would protect, above all, the interests of Wall Street, the pharmaceutical industry, the health insurance companies, and so on,” Herbert wrote in his editorial of January 25 entitled, “A Credibility Gap.” 

“Who IS Barack Obama?” asks Bob Herbert of the New York Times. 

“Americans want to know what he stands for, where his line in the sand is, what he’ll really fight for, and where he wants to lead this nation,” Herbert concluded.  “They want to know who their president really is.” 


It is safe to say that the U.S. government today is a far cry from what the framers of the Constitution intended.  Congress has lost its control over our currency and completely abdicated its role as the only branch that can declare war.  These powers now belong to the president, directly or indirectly.  The executive branch has gained immense power at the expense of the legislative branch, our representatives in Congress.  The result is that our presidents have much more power than envisioned by the Founding Fathers.  The real power of the U.S. government is centralized in the person of the president, who has more power than a king or czar.  To control the United States one need only control the president.  The president is controlled by the people around him, his chief of staff and senior advisors.  This is why it is essential to understand who advises the president because these are the people who shape the policies of the White House.  

To understand the Obama presidency one needs to know the people who made Barack Obama president.  Chief among the people behind the Obama presidency is David Axelrod, Obama’s friend, senior advisor, and chief media and political strategist.  If one were to look behind the televised images of Barack Obama, one would find David Axelrod writing the speeches and creating the image of the candidate and the president.  While Barack Obama is the face of the current administration, the policies, words, and images are creations of David Axelrod.  So overwhelming is his influence on the White House that it would be fair to call this the Axelrod Presidency.

David Axelrod is the man who explains the Obama administration to the world. 

Axelrod is Obama’s right-hand man and is always at his side. 

Axelrod goes everywhere Obama goes… 

Axelrod writes Obama’s speeches… 

and coaches him on how to present them, as he has since 1992.

Axelrod has been with Obama as his advisor and chief strategist every step of the way, creating and shaping the candidate who became president after a short career as a politician from Chicago. 

Looking at the Obama White House from outside, one might get the impression that David Axelrod is the real president and Obama is his spokesman. 


The most peculiar thing about David Axelrod is that although he is clearly one of the most powerful men in the government of the United States, for most Americans he remains an unknown factor.  The controlled media does nothing to help us understand who Axelrod is.  How can that be?  How is it that Axelrod represents the executive branch of the U.S. government on television and speaks to the media daily about the policies of the U.S. government and nobody cares to explain who this person is and how he became senior advisor to President Obama?  Who is this senior political advisor to the president who said, quite incorrectly, in June 2009 that Iran had nuclear weapons – on national television?  Who is Axelrod to say that Iran will face consequences for failing to submit to the extra-judicial dictates of the so-called “international community,” as he did at the end of 2009? 

David Axelrod is a Chicago-based media consultant, advertising man, and corporate lobbyist who makes his living by changing public opinion to support his clients, who are primarily political candidates and major corporations.  Axelrod is really a paid lobbyist who uses television advertising to change public opinion on behalf of his clients.  Because he has two kinds of clients – political candidates and large corporations – Axelrod started two media companies: AKP&D Message and Media for politicians, and ASK Public Strategies for corporations.  While all partners at AKP&D (A is for Axelrod, with John Kupper, David Plouffe, and John Del Cecato) held senior positions on the Obama campaign, it wasn’t the only campaign AKP&D worked on.  AKP&D also provided services to the presidential campaigns of John Edwards and Hillary Clinton. 

Creating a positive image to affect public opinion through television ads is one of the basic services Axelrod provides.  To do this he writes most of their speeches.  Because he has so many politicians as clients, sometimes he re-uses the same speech.  When Obama the candidate used the same speech that Deval Patrick or John Edwards had used earlier, it wasn’t plagerism – it was simply Obama reading a recycled Axelrod speech. 



David Axelrod is described on the White House website as the former “Senior Partner” at AKP&D, who “managed media strategy and communications for more than 150 local, state, and national campaigns, with a focus on progressive candidates and causes.”  

SourceWatch has information about David Axelrod and his media companies.  As a former resident of Cook County who was born and raised in the Chicago area, I can say that the people who Axelrod has helped put into office in Illinois and Chicago are anything but “progressive.”  Having monitored elections in Cook County, I can say with a high degree of certainty that the Chicago-based political figures that Axelrod has worked with are actually part of a large criminal enterprise. 

Why would David Axelrod be involved in promoting candidates who are so easily corrupted?  Why is a son of Romanian Jewish immigrants working to promote black candidates in cities and states across the country?  Who tells Axelrod who to support and what policies to promote? 

to be continued…   

 Sources and Recommended Reading: 

“Obama’s Credibility Gap” by Bob Herbert, New York Times, January 25, 2010



Norway Pays Bitter Price for Mass Third World Immigration
All 21 reported cases of rape with aggravated assault — the highest number since records were started — in the Norwegian capital of Oslo last year were committed by “non-Western immigrants” and 90 percent of all rape victims were Norwegian women, police have announced.

Oslo police spokeswoman Hanne Kristine Rohde defied the strictures of political correctness to release the figures in an interview on the national Norwegian broadcaster, NRK. She said she was aware that the “statistics are controversial.”

When she was asked by NRK if the police were not “stigmatising an entire community” by releasing the statistics, Ms Rohde said she “wants to contribute to a better and safe world. That’s why the truth needs to be told. I hope the debate will focus on that,” she told NRK.

According to the police figures, the number of rapes with violent assault committed in Oslo also doubled compared to 2008. According to the police statement, “in each and every case, not only in 2008 and 2009 but also in 2007, the offender was a non-Western immigrant. At the same time, in 9 out of 10 cases, the victim was Norwegian, not just by nationality, but also by ethnicity.”

[JdN: Let us NEVER forget WHO changes the immigration laws so violent muslims can pour in, the JUZE. The reasons are 1) sadistic juish hatred of whites (juze call white women shiksas, which means “hunks of meat”; a ju called me a shegets (the male version of shiksa) right on, then in August 2008 they closed this entire huge web forum) 2) they want more crime so as to justify a police state; 3 they want a race war so they can justify martial law; 4) they want to destroy the highly recessive genes of blond and blue-eyed people by intermixing with non-whites.)

The NRK report concluded that “not a single one of the offenders had a Western background. Four people have been arrested. In all other cases, the victims reported that the offenders either looked like non-Western immigrants, or they spoke a non-Western language. Not a single case has been connected to a Western man.”

According to official figures released in 2008, Third World immigration accounted for 25 percent of Oslo’s population. Data from the city and state statistics bureau shows that of Oslo’s 560,484 residents, 137,878 were immigrants.

The largest single immigrant group continues to be from Pakistan. Next in line is Somalia. Other countries with relatively large immigrant groups in Oslo include Sri Lanka, Iraq, Turkey, Vietnam and Iran.

In addition, an ever -growing group of Third World immigrants is dependent on welfare. A study by Tyra Ekhaugen of the Frisch Centre for Economic Research and the University of Oslo concluded that immigration has increased the pressure on the welfare state, because many immigrants do not join the tax-paying part of the population.

Third World immigrants are, the study showed, recipients of social security benefits at a rate ten times that of native Norwegians — destroying the liberal argument used by pro-immigration politicians in Norway that immigration was necessary to maintain the social welfare state.

More than half of all social security benefits in the city of Oslo are spent on non-Western immigrants. Immigrants from Africa have the highest unemployment rate, with official figures in 2005 showing a black unemployment rate of 17.5 percent.

Immigrants from Asia had an unemployment rate of 12.3 percent, while those from South and Central America had an unemployment rate of 10.1 percent. The average unemployment rate amongst native Norwegians was 2.4 percent.


Mel Gibson has created a supreme work of art. Most do not realize that Mel graduated from the finest school of drama in Australia, but now in his fifties Gibson is truly at the full height of his genius.

There are many messages embedded in this film, which was done by a virtually all-Aryan or at least non-juish staff. (There is ONE juish co-producer, Alan Rissner, out of four, and the excellent musical score is by a ju named Shor.) The bad guys ALL look juish or darkish-part-juish, and especially the hitmen, who are CLEARLY Mossad types. Forget the WASP names he gives the villains. (Gibson suffered numerous death threats against himself and his family during the making of The Passion and after his Malibu arrest remarks came out via a juish cop, and in fact he built a mountain safehouse down in Costa Rica for his family’s protection. Mel knows about the fear of death, as I do and all who oppose ju terror and tyranny.)

The ending is awesomely spiritual.

I was thinking about this movie all last night after Margi and I saw it, and she loved it too. Though the movie has its violence, I think most women will really love this film, which is ultimately about a father and a daughter, and a white man’s NATURAL INSTINCTS, RAGE and NEED FOR JUSTICE.

It was also good for me to sees my old town of Boston and “heah” those Boston accents, which Mel handled pretty well. I had an epiphany of sorts watching this extremely anti-NWO movie when it showed the Federal Reserve of Boston Building, a perfect example in its strange shape of a satanic, horned beast.  (Just how many office buildings have HORNS like this? The juze love these inside jokes.)

I won’t say any more in this post but will discuss the movie tomorrow with Clayton Douglas on his radio show on The Free American, 10 am East Coast time (-5 hours GMT).

Clayton Douglas' website:

See the movie, support Mel Gibson  and by getting your cinema ticket (you want to see this on the big screen anyways) tell the Hollyweird juze that the “shegets”  world they hate still loves this incredible white Christian genius, this truthsayer and consummate artist, Mel Gibson. (If the juze yank it from the theaters, it will still do huge business in video and worldwide, just as did the pro-white eugenics comedy “Idiocracy”.)


1 Comment

  1. I recently watched EOD online and came away with a slightly different opinion. There were a few cryptic messages in the film and they were not hard to spot if one is wide awake.

    As in several other films, like the “Alien” trilogy for example, Hollywood’s customary treatment of characters when dealing with the big-bad corporation is to dispense with them, usually in a nasty manner. In other words, Hollywood seems to be sending the message – you can’t win with corporations – even if its warranted because they have the judicial system in their hip pocket.

    Then there were the sleazy politicians and their handlers. Toward the end they were sitting in the Senator’s living room chatting about Thomas Craven’s (Gibson) visit earlier that day. Their demeanor was condescending and full of contempt for Det. Craven inferring ‘of course, he’s crazy’. I detected nothing unstable in Craven’s ultimatum to the Senator except his determination to get the truth, yet these dirtbags insinuate that Det. Craven is mentally unbalanced.

    This is art imitating life since the U.S. government is trying desperately to criminalize any action pertaining to decency and morality.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.